Sorry!! The article you are trying to read is not available now.
Thank you very much;
you're only a step away from
downloading your reports.

Boeing Strikers Still Raging Against Machine

By

Machinists seek job security; management seeks outsourcers.

PrintPRINT
It doesn't look like anyone will benefit from the strike of 27,000 machinists at Boeing (BA).

The workers walked out on September 6th, before financial markets took the swan dive that required a global bailout to avoid Armageddon.

Still, the housing crunch was buffetting the economy and unemployment was rising when unionized workers walked out. Striking at the start of what sure looks like a recession wouldn't be smart, even aside from the fact that the workers will never get back lost wages.

This is Boeing's longest strike since 1995. Machinists, who average $65,000 a year with overtime, are scraping by on $150 a week in strike benefits and are taking part-time jobs where they can find them, the Wall Street Journal reports.

Strikers say they want to lock in job security. Sure - who wouldn't? But how do you do it in a global economy, especially now?

The strike costs Boeing as much as $100 million a day in lost revenue from unmet deliveries. The company's new 787 Dreamliner is already about 2 years behind schedule, and the strike may push the first flight of the new plane into next year.

Meanwhile, commercial airlines have been hammered by rising fuel costs. Some airlines have cut flights as businesses and leisure travelers trim their budgets.

Labor and management are expected to resume negotiations today with federal mediators. But both sides remain far apart on a key issue: Whether Boeing can farm out more work to outside contractors. This almost certainly means there will be no quick resolution to the strike.

Union members say they've already lost too much work to outsourcing. Boeing counters that it can't guarantee job security because it could erode the company's future competitiveness.

Let's see: Jobs in auto manufacturing and textiles have moved overseas or into nonunion US plants. The United Auto Workers backed off pension demands, because US automakers are ailing and their survival is in doubt. Boeing strikers might ask: Is there a pattern here?
< Previous
No positions in stocks mentioned.
The information on this website solely reflects the analysis of or opinion about the performance of securities and financial markets by the writers whose articles appear on the site. The views expressed by the writers are not necessarily the views of Minyanville Media, Inc. or members of its management. Nothing contained on the website is intended to constitute a recommendation or advice addressed to an individual investor or category of investors to purchase, sell or hold any security, or to take any action with respect to the prospective movement of the securities markets or to solicit the purchase or sale of any security. Any investment decisions must be made by the reader either individually or in consultation with his or her investment professional. Minyanville writers and staff may trade or hold positions in securities that are discussed in articles appearing on the website. Writers of articles are required to disclose whether they have a position in any stock or fund discussed in an article, but are not permitted to disclose the size or direction of the position. Nothing on this website is intended to solicit business of any kind for a writer's business or fund. Minyanville management and staff as well as contributing writers will not respond to emails or other communications requesting investment advice.

Copyright 2011 Minyanville Media, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
PrintPRINT
 
Featured Videos

WHAT'S POPULAR IN THE VILLE