The Investment Trilogy
Fundamental, technical analyses are useless without money management.
Thank you for both buzzing and then posting the answer to my question. Always a thrill and an ego boost to see my question in print. May I expand?
While I understand that technical analysis is really the art of looking at the mind of the investing masses in graph/chart form, and thus anything that happens in the market is part of that mind/graph/chart, how can we apply any real significance to technical moves when those moves were gamed by government intervention?
For example, when looking back at the tape a month from now with the market dropping, we might look at the chart and say that this 500 Dow point move up on March 23, 2009 was obviously a show of confidence in the market, and thus should be viewed as support.
But that support was only there because of massive intervention by an outside force that might not be there the next time we visit that level. Don't all these artificial and deliberate interventions distort your technical analysis and actually increase the risk you're trying to mitigate by using technical analysis?
Hop do you compensate for this? Or is it even necessary at this point?
Dear Minyan Michael,
First of all I wanted to thank you for your excellent query. The question you've asked is often on the minds of many, and yet asked by few.
For decades, investors and traders have tended to belong to either the "fundamental analysis" camp or the "technical analysis camp." The fundamentalists view technical analysis as voodoo and are generally dismissive of technical assessments. After all, how can charts tell the future? How can the future be an extrapolation of the past? At best, they believe that certain short-term action can be explained by too many technical analysts watching the same levels on a chart, as you've highlighted.
The technical analysts, on the other hand, believe that all fundamental facts have been endlessly researched and are discounted in the price. They believe that price and volume patterns can offer valuable clues about the future direction of a stock. They highlight that stocks typically discount the future, so if you want fundamentals to change, you would typically miss a large percentage of the move (for example, it's widely known that stocks tend to bottom approximately 6 months before the end of a bear recession).
The information on this website solely reflects the analysis of or opinion about the performance of securities and financial markets by the writers whose articles appear on the site. The views expressed by the writers are not necessarily the views of Minyanville Media, Inc. or members of its management. Nothing contained on the website is intended to constitute a recommendation or advice addressed to an individual investor or category of investors to purchase, sell or hold any security, or to take any action with respect to the prospective movement of the securities markets or to solicit the purchase or sale of any security. Any investment decisions must be made by the reader either individually or in consultation with his or her investment professional. Minyanville writers and staff may trade or hold positions in securities that are discussed in articles appearing on the website. Writers of articles are required to disclose whether they have a position in any stock or fund discussed in an article, but are not permitted to disclose the size or direction of the position. Nothing on this website is intended to solicit business of any kind for a writer's business or fund. Minyanville management and staff as well as contributing writers will not respond to emails or other communications requesting investment advice.
Copyright 2011 Minyanville Media, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Daily Recap Newsletter