...does anyone else feel there are gonna be two sides to the summer volatility story?
Keep your eyes peeled to market internals as they're now 2:1 negative.
That, coupled with the downside reversal in Goldman (GS) and the brokers, bodes well for the "paring" scenario (in front of the Turnaround Tuesday earnings parade).
"It is noted that the CBOE equity put/call ratio has recorded readings in the 0.50 region for seven straight sessions. It is therefore reflecting the most option trader optimism in several years." Jay Shartsis on today's Buzz.
My favorite part about the new & improved 'Ville? I cannot tell a lie…
A few Minyans have pinged asking whether we're in the midst of the "echo bubble" that we used to muse about way back when. My response was "to which bubble are you referring?"
If we're talking stocks, I think it's situation specific---it's hard to make the case that the broader tape, at these levels, is a parabolic frolic. That is, of course, unless you pull back the camera and view the dew through a four year lens.
Click to enlarge Click to enlarge
What I will offer is that we're seeing bubbles of a different breed, from debt to derivatives to hedge fund and private equity, that are fueling asset classes around the world. Yes, it can last longer than most folks believe but that should not sway you from a methodology that will allow you to stay in the game regardless of the
Trailing stops. Defined Risk. Proactive patience. Discipline over conviction. It should never take a bad tape to invoke good mechanics.
And Retort, courtesy of Minyan Michael Santoli of Barron's…
Hey Guys, the new face looks great-- congrats!
Just a quick note on the now vs. '87 charts: Look at the percentage moves, or use a log scale. This time we're up less than 40% in the four years, while heading into the crash the Dow had well more than doubled. This time the S&P has doubled off the bottom, while it had tripled from the '82 low into the '87 high.
I happen like the '87 analogy myself (more importantly, so does Professor Woody Dorsey), but the velocity of the move in recent years hasn't yet matched that period's. Which is why I'm partial to '97 as a touchstone (globalization was considered only a bullish thing, crowded emerging markets trades, runaway financial "innovation," deals that then seemed crazy - MS/DWD, T/TCOMA, etc.) though in '97 we had the benefit of a massive bond-market rally, which we now lack.
We know '97 as a pretty good year, but there was a 12% S&P drawdown in 20 days that fall.
Thanks Mike, and we now return to our regularly scheduled Random Thoughts…
Energy is also taking a well-deserved breather as money continues to rotate into beta and cyclical issues.
Speaking of cyclical issues, does anyone else feel there are gonna be two sides to the summer volatility story?
The OSX, while 26% above its 200-day, continues to hold its very nice uptrend.
Chill, Phil, you've simply got a case of the Mondays and it promises to be a heckuva busy week.
Todd Harrison is the founder and Chief Executive Officer of Minyanville. Prior to his current role, Mr. Harrison was President and head trader at a $400 million dollar New York-based hedge fund. Todd welcomes your comments and/or feedback at email@example.com.
The information on this website solely reflects the analysis of or opinion about the performance of securities and financial markets by the writers whose articles appear on the site. The views expressed by the writers are not necessarily the views of Minyanville Media, Inc. or members of its management. Nothing contained on the website is intended to constitute a recommendation or advice addressed to an individual investor or category of investors to purchase, sell or hold any security, or to take any action with respect to the prospective movement of the securities markets or to solicit the purchase or sale of any security. Any investment decisions must be made by the reader either individually or in consultation with his or her investment professional. Minyanville writers and staff may trade or hold positions in securities that are discussed in articles appearing on the website. Writers of articles are required to disclose whether they have a position in any stock or fund discussed in an article, but are not permitted to disclose the size or direction of the position. Nothing on this website is intended to solicit business of any kind for a writer's business or fund. Minyanville management and staff as well as contributing writers will not respond to emails or other communications requesting investment advice.
Copyright 2011 Minyanville Media, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Daily Recap Newsletter