Bank Watch: The Dead Man's Yield Curve
By Peter Atwater May 29, 2009 9:30 am
Beware the return of carry trades.
"With the yield curve this steep, banks should be minting money." If one more CNBC commentator says that, I'm going to throw a brick through my TV.

Don't get me wrong; I understand the concept: Banks can, in theory, borrow from the Federal Reserve at 18 basis points (bps) (yesterday's Effective Fed Funds Rate), purchase 10-year Treasuries at 3.70%, and book the difference.
But I'd offer that the reality in our current banking system makes that concept more than ridiculous - at least for any meaningful amount.
To rewind the tape, a major contributor to our current banking crisis is exactly what TV pundits are now encouraging banks to repeat - what's known in the industry as "the carry trade." Borrow short/lend long and let the yield curve do all the work. And for those who may have already forgotten, this was done not just on bank and investment bank balance sheets, but through SIVs and structured commercial paper vehicles as well. A toxic combination of leverage and asset/liabilities mismatches, not to mention credit risk.
And what did we and the banking regulators all learn from this? Liquidity matters. And now more than ever.
So at a time when banks would really like to reload the carry trade in size, bank regulators are demanding more and more bank-investment holdings to be in cash or cash equivalents - the absolute other end of the yield curve.
Worse, the regulators are trying to wean banks like JPMorgan (JPM), Bank of America (BAC) and Bank of New York (BK) off the FDIC-insured debt-issuance program, demanding -- as a precondition to TARP repayment -- that banks demonstrate that they can issue large volumes of long-term uninsured debt. (And in this regard, I'd highlight Goldman Sachs' (GS) $1.0 billion reopening of its 10-year bond at 337.5 bps over the 10-year - or 7.50%. To these eyes, this is arguably a far worse reverse carry trade; borrow long at high spreads and do what with it profitably without taking either extreme credit or market risk?)
Finally, with bank transaction deposits yielding nothing, the average consumer is moving into CDs, trying to take advantage of that same yield curve that the pundits are suggesting banks exploit going the other direction.
The net of all of this is that there are any number of countervailing forces at work, making it all but impossible for banks to capture the opportunity at hand. And as yesterday's FDIC Quarterly Banking Profile highlights, even with all of the government's help to date driving the short end of the curve to zero, bank net-interest margins aren't expanding.
And in the case of smaller banks, they're continuing to shrink.

Don't get me wrong; I understand the concept: Banks can, in theory, borrow from the Federal Reserve at 18 basis points (bps) (yesterday's Effective Fed Funds Rate), purchase 10-year Treasuries at 3.70%, and book the difference.
But I'd offer that the reality in our current banking system makes that concept more than ridiculous - at least for any meaningful amount.
To rewind the tape, a major contributor to our current banking crisis is exactly what TV pundits are now encouraging banks to repeat - what's known in the industry as "the carry trade." Borrow short/lend long and let the yield curve do all the work. And for those who may have already forgotten, this was done not just on bank and investment bank balance sheets, but through SIVs and structured commercial paper vehicles as well. A toxic combination of leverage and asset/liabilities mismatches, not to mention credit risk.
And what did we and the banking regulators all learn from this? Liquidity matters. And now more than ever.
So at a time when banks would really like to reload the carry trade in size, bank regulators are demanding more and more bank-investment holdings to be in cash or cash equivalents - the absolute other end of the yield curve.
Worse, the regulators are trying to wean banks like JPMorgan (JPM), Bank of America (BAC) and Bank of New York (BK) off the FDIC-insured debt-issuance program, demanding -- as a precondition to TARP repayment -- that banks demonstrate that they can issue large volumes of long-term uninsured debt. (And in this regard, I'd highlight Goldman Sachs' (GS) $1.0 billion reopening of its 10-year bond at 337.5 bps over the 10-year - or 7.50%. To these eyes, this is arguably a far worse reverse carry trade; borrow long at high spreads and do what with it profitably without taking either extreme credit or market risk?)
Finally, with bank transaction deposits yielding nothing, the average consumer is moving into CDs, trying to take advantage of that same yield curve that the pundits are suggesting banks exploit going the other direction.
The net of all of this is that there are any number of countervailing forces at work, making it all but impossible for banks to capture the opportunity at hand. And as yesterday's FDIC Quarterly Banking Profile highlights, even with all of the government's help to date driving the short end of the curve to zero, bank net-interest margins aren't expanding.
And in the case of smaller banks, they're continuing to shrink.
Position in SPY options and JPM
The information on this website solely reflects the analysis of or opinion about the performance of securities and financial markets by the writers whose articles appear on the site. The views expressed by the writers are not necessarily the views of Minyanville Media, Inc. or members of its management. Nothing contained on the website is intended to constitute a recommendation or advice addressed to an individual investor or category of investors to purchase, sell or hold any security, or to take any action with respect to the prospective movement of the securities markets or to solicit the purchase or sale of any security. Any investment decisions must be made by the reader either individually or in consultation with his or her investment professional. Minyanville writers and staff may trade or hold positions in securities that are discussed in articles appearing on the website. Writers of articles are required to disclose whether they have a position in any stock or fund discussed in an article, but are not permitted to disclose the size or direction of the position. Nothing on this website is intended to solicit business of any kind for a writer's business or fund. Minyanville management and staff as well as contributing writers will not respond to emails or other communications requesting investment advice.
Copyright 2009 Minyanville Media, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Copyright 2009 Minyanville Media, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
(2)
Reply
2009-05-30 06:01:04
"if i hear one more time..."
i thought of you ;-) and my imaginary brick, when i heard kudlow say (paraprhasing) with that sheepish boyish grin of his, "With the yield curve this steep, banks should be minting money."
i think there's either an ignorance or willing disbelief, in the growing move by regular people, to prefer to keep their money, than search for tiny differences in interest return -
and as the highest tax bracket payers remind us, those of "us" who don't pay the majority of taxes, are evidently most of the people, and most of us just don't have enough money to worry whether we're getting 0% to 1% or even 2 or 3 % on the amount of extra monies we might have...keeping the money is more important
now, as bond yields continue moving up, some of our eyes may start getting too big for our stomachs ;-)
but none of this is gonna help the banks get our money again to squander as before (that's the general perception of most people around me)
and most people i know aren't fooled by threats of inflation to jump up and go out and buy stuff before it goes up in price...who cares...we might need that money for food or rent or health care....
i think there's either an ignorance or willing disbelief, in the growing move by regular people, to prefer to keep their money, than search for tiny differences in interest return -
and as the highest tax bracket payers remind us, those of "us" who don't pay the majority of taxes, are evidently most of the people, and most of us just don't have enough money to worry whether we're getting 0% to 1% or even 2 or 3 % on the amount of extra monies we might have...keeping the money is more important
now, as bond yields continue moving up, some of our eyes may start getting too big for our stomachs ;-)
but none of this is gonna help the banks get our money again to squander as before (that's the general perception of most people around me)
and most people i know aren't fooled by threats of inflation to jump up and go out and buy stuff before it goes up in price...who cares...we might need that money for food or rent or health care....
2009-11-23 21:15:44
fitch
People all over the world know the <a title="abercrombie and fitch" href="http://www.anfworld.com/" rel="dofollow"><strong>abercrombie and fitch</strong></a>,but not everyone really knows how fashion the abercrombie is,hollister is the Legend maker. Everybody wears the hollister clothing would be the abercrombie mensand the abercrombie womens, if you want know you can search the Ruehl No.925 or abercrombie outlet in the www.google.com .
Get real-time options trading ideas from Steve Smith, veteran options trader and newsletter author, plus let him show you the way to cut risk and boost your returns through the strategic use of options. Click here for a free 14 day trial to OptionSmith by Steve Smith.
Copyright 2009 Minyanville Media, Inc. All Rights Reserved
















