Cart (0)
business newsWall Street to Clean Up in AIG Mess
Banks raking in millions for disaster they created is appalling.
PRINT
 |
|
As AIG management labors to spin off divisions, cut costs, and overhaul what was once the world’s biggest insurance company, Wall Street banks are lining up to collect huge advisory fees. According to the Wall Street Journal, when the dust settles, the Federal Reserve Bank of New York and AIG could shell out nearly $1 billion in fees to banks and law firms. That's, however, less than 1% of the taxpayer money put on the line to bail out AIG.
The task of unwinding the complex web of derivatives and shady investments that doomed AIG is, to say the least, no easy task. Teams of bankers, analysts, and attorneys are required to complete the job -- none of whom come cheap. The Journal reports that Morgan Stanley (MS) stands to be the largest benefactor from dismantling AIG, and could reap as much as $250 million in fees. Goldman Sachs (GS), Bank of America (BAC) and JPMorgan (JPM) have also been tapped for various roles, putting them in line for big payouts.
For example, part of AIG’s reorganization plan calls for 2 initial public offerings, which will aim to raise $5 billion by offering investors the chance to buy into an Asian life insurance unit and American International Assurance Co. -- a wealth-management and retirement-planning division. Morgan Stanley and Deutsche Bank (DB) could each take home as much as $45 million in fees after being named as lead underwriters for the deals.
At first blush, the very notion of Wall Street banks raking in hundreds of millions of dollars in fees for cleaning up the AIG mess -- one which they were certainly complicit in creating -- is somewhere between nauseating and infuriating. But on the other hand, is there another option?
Sure, the government could demand that Morgan Stanley, Goldman, and the like offer up their services for free, honoring their civic duty to fix the mess they helped create. But right or wrong, the chances of that happening are exactly nil. The problems are complex enough that there are only a handful of people in the financial-services industry with the knowledge and experience to even begin to tackle the problem, so there just aren't many alternatives.
But more important than the icy reality that some of taxpayers’ $100 billion “investment” into AIG is going to pay off Wall Street, is how the country handles the news. As many a Minyanville Professor is apt to say, “The reaction to news is more important than the news itself.” Indeed. This spring, when news broke that AIG would be paying billions to Goldman Sachs and other trading partners, there were literally riots in the street. So if the streets are quiet this morning, does that mean the latest payments are less despicable, or that social mood has shifted such that these blatant abuses of taxpayer trust are now commonplace?
And, to take it a step further -- if the latter is true, has the country simply rolled over, content to let Washington and Wall Street rape Main Street in the interest of some amorphous concept of "stability" or "economic recovery"? Truly then, we must ask the question Professor Kevin Depew asked a couple weeks back:
Where is the outrage?
Join Hoofy & Boo as they take you through what happened with AIG, from start to finish:
The information on this website solely reflects the analysis of or opinion about the performance of securities and financial markets by the writers whose articles appear on the site. The views expressed by the writers are not necessarily the views of Minyanville Media, Inc. or members of its management. Nothing contained on the website is intended to constitute a recommendation or advice addressed to an individual investor or category of investors to purchase, sell or hold any security, or to take any action with respect to the prospective movement of the securities markets or to solicit the purchase or sale of any security. Any investment decisions must be made by the reader either individually or in consultation with his or her investment professional. Minyanville writers and staff may trade or hold positions in securities that are discussed in articles appearing on the website. Writers of articles are required to disclose whether they have a position in any stock or fund discussed in an article, but are not permitted to disclose the size or direction of the position. Nothing on this website is intended to solicit business of any kind for a writer's business or fund. Minyanville management and staff as well as contributing writers will not respond to emails or other communications requesting investment advice.
Copyright 2011 Minyanville Media, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
