Recipe For a Market Meltdown
(Tom Petty)

My grandfather taught me many things, one of which was to always “think positive.” As a financial professional, I’m careful not to confuse that powerful perspective with blind bullishness.
As we edge towards the midpoint of the calendar year, the bovine have reason for optimism. Despite credit contagion, debt unwinds, structural smoke, geopolitical risks and a housing abyss, mainstay market proxies are only down mid-single digits.
I’ve learned a few things over the course of my career, three of which currently warrant particular attention. First, the reaction to news is more important than the news itself. Second, stay humble or the market will do it for you. Third, discipline must always trump conviction.
With those lessons in tow, I wanted to explore another topic, one that few people have a motivation to discuss. It’s the risk of a seismic equity readjustment, a possibility that has much higher odds than most people currently foresee.
The market is fluid and multi-linear, which is a fancy way of saying that “things can change and they often do.” Still, the ingredients for a downside disconnect exist, conditional elements that, when brewed together, could combine for a toxic ride that will come to define 2008.
The Bank Bungee
We often say “As go the piggies, so goes the poke” in Minyanville and for good reason. The BKX (bank index) has been a prescient precursor of the S&P 500 for many years. The fact that so many now expect a decoupling between the two only serves to reinforce the risk inherent in the relationship.
Quite simply, the financials must catch a sustainable bid or the S&P will get sloppy in a hurry. This, more than any other juxtaposition, remains front and center as we digest earnings from Lehman Brothers (LEH), Goldman Sachs (GS) and Morgan Stanley (MS).
China Rider

While the rapid ascent of Chinese stocks garnered a lot of attention last year, the watershed decline has gone largely unnoticed. Shanghai has been testing a critical technical juncture and that bears watching in the era of globalization.
Last week we touched on the importance of Shanghai Composite 3000. It’s where the bubble first broke out in early 2007, a 50% retracement since October—fifty percent!—and where China must hold, particularly if it’s gonna light an upside torch into the Olympics.
The Mood Ring
It’s critical to remember that the stock market crash didn’t cause the Great Depression, the Great Depression caused the stock market to crash. It was an era, not an event.
Social mood and risk appetites determine price action. I offer this in the context of the massive issuance we’ve seen in the financial sector. While they continue to ratchet terms to attract demand, buyers are becoming more selective as evidenced by the absence of Sovereign Wealth Funds in the Lehman Brothers deal.
If and when flailing firms fail to find capable buyers—and there are precious few players fitting that bill—the wheels on the wagon will wobble anew.
Hut, Hut, Hike!
We’re currently standing at the crossroads of our wishbone world, with inflation on one side and deflation on the other. Given the recent rhetoric from government officials—jawboning the dollar last week and attempting to quell rate fears yesterday—it seems like that conundrum in coming to bear.

Federal Fund Futures are now pricing in a 60% chance of an autumn rate hike aimed at combating the devil we know (inflation) while turning a deaf ear towards the devil we don’t (deflation). It’s our sense in Minyanville that this necessary evil has foreign fingerprints all over it.
Perception is reality in the financial markets. If the collective mindset shifts from “the worst is behind us” to “we’re between a rock and a hard place,” the comeuppance will be swift.
Reversal of Fortune
Conventional wisdom dictates that lower crude and a higher dollar will offer an equity panacea. Allowing some room for a Pavlov-style upside response, our take is that this is the biggest misperception in the marketplace.
Since the back of the tech bubble—and contrary to stated public policy—the lower greenback has been the rising tide that lifted all asset class boats. It stands to reason that when this dynamic reverses, equities will not be immune from the swoon.
One Foot in Front of the Other
As always, our ultimate destination pales in comparison to the path that we take to get there. Therein lies the risk and by extension, potential reward in trading the tape as we find our way.

Pundits are pointing to last week’s “higher low” versus the March abyss. That, coupled with retreating input prices, could pave the way for higher prices as fund managers chase performance into a very tenuous quarter-end.
Be that as it may—and it may well prove true—the greatest trick the devil ever pulled was convincing the world he didn’t exist. I’m here to tell you that the imbalances not only remain, they’re cumulative in both cause and effect.
Outlier, or “tail” events, such as downside dislocations are by definition a low probability affair. An outright bet that one will happen is a risky proposition but assimilating the probability that it could is proactively prudent.
What we know is this—regardless of which way the next ten percent manifests, the move will be obvious with the benefit of hindsight. The key—and the tenet that continues to be tested in this tape—is the ability to manage risk rather than chase reward.
The market is like a casino—it has the staying power—so remember that the mechanics of the swing will always trump the results of the at-bat. Capital preservation, debt reduction and financial intelligence remain staunch allies as we wade our way through these unchartered waters.
R.P.
Todd Harrison is the founder and Chief Executive Officer of Minyanville. Prior to his current role, Mr. Harrison was President and head trader at a $400 million dollar New York-based hedge fund. Todd welcomes your comments and/or feedback at todd@minyanville.com.
The information on this website solely reflects the analysis of or opinion about the performance of securities and financial markets by the writers whose articles appear on the site. The views expressed by the writers are not necessarily the views of Minyanville Media, Inc. or members of its management. Nothing contained on the website is intended to constitute a recommendation or advice addressed to an individual investor or category of investors to purchase, sell or hold any security, or to take any action with respect to the prospective movement of the securities markets or to solicit the purchase or sale of any security. Any investment decisions must be made by the reader either individually or in consultation with his or her investment professional. Minyanville writers and staff may trade or hold positions in securities that are discussed in articles appearing on the website. Writers of articles are required to disclose whether they have a position in any stock or fund discussed in an article, but are not permitted to disclose the size or direction of the position. Nothing on this website is intended to solicit business of any kind for a writer's business or fund. Minyanville management and staff as well as contributing writers will not respond to emails or other communications requesting investment advice.
Copyright 2009 Minyanville Media, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
one of your better most recent articles! enjoyed and much to think on...i agree with your assessment.
keep up the good workk for the minyans.
In other words, A "how to" article. Thanks !
but after friday's irrational bounce, that feeling has subsided (even though i admit that would have been a good day to get short for those who weren't)
strangely, and i could be wrong, i now feel a sense of complacency has floated in, and it could last awhile
note: dave, playing the bear side of the market is not complicated AT ALL! the rub is it takes KNOBBY BALLS to go against the incessant bull pulpit pronouncments of the positive propaganda prognosticators
one only needs some dry powder and a buy order for an equivalent aliquot of QID or other broad inverse fund
check out her photo, pure hot-pot!
China will be less of an effect on our economy as their inflation becomes less affordable to our consumer. The only thing that will keep China involved in our economy would be if our inflation on domestically produced consumer goods out paces theirs.
In regards to inflation and deflation I believe we are going to be in a combo scenario where we have inflation on what we need such as oil, food and basics while having deflation on homes, recreation toys, commercial properties etc and stagflation on wages benefits and employment..
As for the great depression it was my impression that the roaring twenties and the excess of living beyond ones means was what led to a severe market correction of 1928 and thus the depression which led to the final crash of 1931 which was followed by years of hard times till the war. Much like the exuberance of the dot com where stock were split to death till they crashed and later where homes were bought on speculation that values will always go up which we now know is not true.
In a reflection of where we are today where to many highly paid execs proved that they were not worth what they were getting paid by either being ignorant or corrupt and where politicians of special interest like Cheney and Bush lead us into a abyss of fatal choices we find ourselves as a nation hanging on a balance of losing our status as leaders of the world to being beggars of the world looking for hand outs to finance our excess's. At this point I think you could put lipstick on a sloth and have better leadership then Bush and Cheney. As for the banks and their mortgage crisis. Let them stew in their fecal pile of debt. They knew what they were doing when they made those loans. Their short term greed over rode their common sense. Where was the board of Directors in all of this? Looks to me like a massive copulation to the shareholders. Washington Mutual took their shareholders for over 40 billion dollars. Whamu Mr. Killinger. We need to ask ourselves were they stupid or are they crooked?
You all have a nice day.
JPM
Right now, it sure looks to me a lot like October 1987. Not so much in the matter that a big, earth shattering crash is imminent (despite some significant down day appearing quite possible here), but rather that a capitulation sell-off shaking weak hands of their shares appears to be what's needed before a base can form and a march beyond '07 index highs can commence.
This scenario seems to back the story behind the performance dichotomy we're seeing in major indexes. Maybe there's some measure of over-confidence and/or fearlessness giving rise to declining volume since the March bottom. Given the stock market's performance over the past quarter century it's really no wonder. Plainly, it appears the greater preponderance of players do not wish to miss the next big rally. The simple fact of the matter is, though, shares are not being offered up for sale. Is it any wonder when it's a well-known fact money market funds are bursting at the seams with $3.5 trillion? And Maria knows, that money has got to go somewhere.
So, maybe an October 1987-style panic is what's needed to get the show back on the road. It worked then, so why not now?
Here's what I think. RBS stunned the financial world forecasting SPX 1050 by September. I, on the other hand, think this could happen by early next week. What's more, the technical case is, indeed, rather conclusive. It's been developing for weeks now and my conviction is complete.
Per discipline in this instance, I'm risking only $500 trading OEX options on the prospect of fairly easily turning this into some modest 5-figure sum. I won't bore you here with what I'll do if all goes as planned...

















