Wal-Mart Goes Green, Makes Green

By Andrew Jeffery Jan 26, 2009 10:30 am

The kinder, gentler, ever more profitable big-box retailer.



For card-carrying environmentalists, going green and avoiding corporate mega-brands go hand-in-hand. But as big companies embrace earth-friendly products and practices, many eco-activists may be forced to tone down their anti-business rhetoric.

This weekend’s New York Times highlights how Wal-Mart (WMT), the world’s biggest retailer (and affectionately nicknamed "Evil Destroyer of Communities" by some) has used its clout to push many of its competitors, suppliers and fellow corporate titans towards green-friendly business.

In 2005, Wal-Mart executives met with leading environmentalists to devise a scheme aimed at rejuvenating the firm’s flagging bottom line by going green. CEO H. Lee Scott Jr. challenged his colleagues to change the way they did business, turn public opinion back in favor of the retailing giant, and remake Wal-Mart’s tarnished image.

In his own words, Scott said “It wasn’t a matter of telling our story better, we had to create a better story.”

Despite record earnings, Wal-Mart had an abysmal record on environmental, labor and health-care issues. To be sure, keeping track of almost 2 million employees is no easy task, but by most accounts the Arkansas-based company treated its workers with remarkable disdain.

As public-relations risk increased and labor groups’ assault on the company intensified, Wal-Mart’s stock price lagged. Sales slipped as rivals like Kmart and Target (TGT) captured some of the megalith's business from more well-to-do clientele.

After coming to the startling realization that image mattered -- that the company needed to change its practices rather than work at silencing critics -- Scott sought to remake the firm at which he worked for more than 20 years before becoming its CEO. Sustainability, he felt, would be the key to the company’s resurgence.

Suppliers had little choice but to follow suit.

General Electric (GE), for example, though loath to sell longer lasting light bulbs (which need to be replaced less often), ramped up production of fluorescent bulbs in response to Scott's demands. Wal-Mart's drive to sell only concentrated liquid laundry detergent saves hundreds of millions of gallons of water, not to mention fuel, plastic and cardboard. Proctor & Gamble (PG), which makes Tide laundry detergent, couldn’t help but cooperate - lest it lose an extremely valuable customer.

Environmental movements are notoriously grassroots movements: What they lack in clout they make up for in vigor. And as going green has become almost sickeningly trendy, corporations have strove to adopt more sustainable business practices.

Large corporations are remarkably powerful in their ability to effect change - both positive and negative. And increasingly, firms are embracing efficient, environmentally friendly ways of doing business.

In 2007 Google (GOOG) built the largest ever solar installation on a corporate campus. Safeway (SWY), one of the biggest grocery-store chains in the country, unveiled 2 new eco-friendly stores on Earth Day 2008.

It's not often that corporate CEOs and environmental activists see eye-to-eye, but on the subject of saving money by going green, they couldn't agree more.
< Previous
  • 1
Next >
No positions in stocks mentioned.

The information on this website solely reflects the analysis of or opinion about the performance of securities and financial markets by the writers whose articles appear on the site. The views expressed by the writers are not necessarily the views of Minyanville Media, Inc. or members of its management. Nothing contained on the website is intended to constitute a recommendation or advice addressed to an individual investor or category of investors to purchase, sell or hold any security, or to take any action with respect to the prospective movement of the securities markets or to solicit the purchase or sale of any security. Any investment decisions must be made by the reader either individually or in consultation with his or her investment professional. Minyanville writers and staff may trade or hold positions in securities that are discussed in articles appearing on the website. Writers of articles are required to disclose whether they have a position in any stock or fund discussed in an article, but are not permitted to disclose the size or direction of the position. Nothing on this website is intended to solicit business of any kind for a writer's business or fund. Minyanville management and staff as well as contributing writers will not respond to emails or other communications requesting investment advice.

Copyright 2011 Minyanville Media, Inc. All Rights Reserved.

WHAT'S POPULAR IN THE VILLE

Recommendations

MARKETS