Google Shoots for Style Over Substance
Greetings from New York, where my daughter, Lou, has left for her first day of kindergarten. A lesser man would have spent his morning fighting the dual urges to weep like a ninny and squeeze his daughter tight enough to keep her from growing anymore. A weaker man would have considered taking out his gun and using it to gesture for the school bus to just "keep on moving" when it arrived this morning to whisk away his daughter's pre-school innocence.
I am exactly that weaker, lesser man. I won't tell you which of the desires I warded off and which I gave into. Suffice it to say, I didn't get arrested and my allergies seem to be kicking in early, judging by my red eyes.
Here's what I'm watching as I try to rebuild a veneer of manhood prior to making my TV comeback this afternoon:
- Crude pushes toward $105 because a storm named like an extra from The Sound of Music didn't gut the drilling infrastructure of the Gulf? The quick money trade is likely on the long side via something like the USO ETF. Bigger picture: If you held up a mirror to the types of upward thrusts we saw when crude was going to $200 it would look exactly like $10 downward moves based on a storm acting entirely normal (Katrina was the exception, not the rule. If it wasn't, New Orleans wouldn't exist.)
- The entire Global Growth story is getting absolutely battered this morning as steel's (ArcelorMittal (MT) and US Steel (X)) and Ags (Potash (POT) and Mosaic (MOS)) drop, in part on news that MT cut prices for the first time in a year. Shouldn't lower crude prices reinforce the Global Economy theme? Fundamentally, sure. In reality (where smart traders try to live), the international story is deader than Gustav as an investment theme. Yup, the BRICs (Brazil, Russia, India, China) are still growing at a decent clip. So is the Internet. You can fill up a book and a ton of airtime arguing the bullish case for growth. Or you can keep it simple and hold on to your gains by noting that the stocks are acting horribly and the global economy is slowing in a way not "in the stocks." It's your choice, but you can guess where I sit.
- Today's best performer in the DJIA is General Motors (GM), despite the fact that GM yet again expressed caution this morning. In today's trading game of "Rock, Scissors, Paper", falling crude oozes over terrible fundamentals. It makes me long to get hedged on my losing Toyota Motors (TM) short with a GM long on a pullback.
- Speaking of "just a wee bit short," my staycation allowed upstate locals to witness my end of the season efforts to do a decent front 1 1/2 flip dive over the weekend. Dive #1 was a something akin to a forehead belly-flop. Leap #2 was more like a 1 and 3/8 but, since we don't trade fractions anymore, I simply rounded up and declared diving victory. My "Mission Accomplished" decision gave considerable relief to both Mrs. Jeffmacke and the teenage lifeguards playing rock, scissors, paper to determine who was going to drag me out of the pool, had I opted to dive until I achieved no-splash-entry perfection.
- Need a graphical visual of my diving efforts? Check out Wal-Mart (WMT), gamely smacking its face against nearly 10 years of resistance just over $60. For perspective, Wal-Mart hasn't traded much higher than this since sometime prior to the 2000 Olympics in Sydney (when I golfed instead of diving, since I didn't have a daughter to swim with and bad golf is annoying but doesn't hurt as much as a face-flop). I'm staying long Wal-Mart, despite the coming seasonal drop in sales of aloe for my face.
- Google (GOOG) announces a browser. Microsoft (MSFT) is still toying with expanding on-line ad sales. Both efforts seem a bit like my 1 1/2 dives: a post-peak entity pursuing a goal well outside its core competence. Of course, in my case it was an idle summer fling with only some additional facial damage on the line. For Google and Microsoft it's expensive flailing for want of the ability to do much else. I'm surly about my Microsoft but it has so many ways to win almost by accident that I stay long the stock. Google continues to sound like the "Internet stocks will grow forever" stories being told during the Sydney Olympics.
The information on this website solely reflects the analysis of or opinion about the performance of securities and financial markets by the writers whose articles appear on the site. The views expressed by the writers are not necessarily the views of Minyanville Media, Inc. or members of its management. Nothing contained on the website is intended to constitute a recommendation or advice addressed to an individual investor or category of investors to purchase, sell or hold any security, or to take any action with respect to the prospective movement of the securities markets or to solicit the purchase or sale of any security. Any investment decisions must be made by the reader either individually or in consultation with his or her investment professional. Minyanville writers and staff may trade or hold positions in securities that are discussed in articles appearing on the website. Writers of articles are required to disclose whether they have a position in any stock or fund discussed in an article, but are not permitted to disclose the size or direction of the position. Nothing on this website is intended to solicit business of any kind for a writer's business or fund. Minyanville management and staff as well as contributing writers will not respond to emails or other communications requesting investment advice.
Copyright 2009 Minyanville Media, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
As a techie, I get frustrated with existing browsers because they just add to existing functionality without addressing the problems they created in the first place. Google started over and built it right. If they deliver on half their promises, guys like me will be pushing it on their families and companies.
That sounds like a buy to me.
I can't get the idea out of my head that a successful Chrome offering would be an ideal place to promote Google products (hopefully noninvasively).
My dad's advice/consolation: arrows are made to fly, not sit safely in the quiver; your job is to carefully aim them with purpose, pray they fly straight, and remember to let them loose. (Easier said than done!)
Best wishes to you and Lou.
An aggressively inscrutable player, Kasparov strives to gain deep positional sacrifices: Even when he can't calculate the end result conclusively, he can make sophisticated generalizations. He does anything to get the initiative and to force the play. Inevitably, he emerges from a forest of complications - in which his intentions aren't all that clear - with the advantage. He's not as artful or as clear as Fischer, but his play coincides with the realities of the day, which are all about defense. Clarity of style no longer makes sense. Great players hide their intentions. â Bruce Pandolfini
The second way is to protect their search market share. I believe this project is in part due to Microsoft's attempt to lock them out of searches in IE. Google does not want to have to rely on the Justice Dept. Much like if you want people to buy your razor blades, give them the razor. One way to keep people using Google Search is to give them a Google product to search on.
The longer term, I think, is a push towards better Office replacements. Chrome is built with a brand new Javascript engine which should make applications run much faster. The multi process approach should make it much more stable. With Google Gears, which allows access to content online and off, I can see Google making a much bigger push into the Office market.
Basically it comes down to the fact that the more time eyeballs are on their products, the more ads they can sell.
--Dave
