FCC Probes Product Placement
Regulators to investigate covert branding.
Indeed, being hunted by the Washington D.C. Precrime police, he could have.
Habitually anti-establishment, it's not surprising sci-fi authors frequently take jabs at increasingly pervasive ad campaigns. Now, The Federal Communications Commission (FCC) seems to be jumping on the bandwagon.
According to The Wall Street Journal, the FCC is taking a hard look at product placement and whether consumers deserve more disclosure when companies surreptitiously hawk their wares. With the advent of TiVo (TIVO) and other ad-skipping technology, advertisers are scrounging for ways to better reach their clientele.
Perceptive television-watchers have undoubtedly noticed name brands creeping into their viewing experience. The Journal cites Coco Cola's (KO) prevalence on Fox's (NWS) American Idol, where judges carefully display their refreshments logo-out. Meanwhile, NBC's (GE) The Biggest Loser is the most saturated show on network television, with 3,977 instances of product placement in the first three months of 2008.
The FCC is concerned such ads don't give consumers sufficient information about which companies are subliminally vying for their discretionary dollars. Advertisers contest product placement isn't done with malicious intent, and that such promotions are done in a clear and straightforward manner.
Digital video recording, however, isn't responsible for the advent of product placement in television and film. After all, who can forget Reese's Pieces (HSY) undeniable pull on a certain memorable extra-terrestrial or Wayne and Garth's shameless product-placement parody.
Well-targeted spots are advertisers' raison d'être. Online stores like Amazon.com (AMZN) offer detailed recommendations based on past purchases and analysis of consumers with similar preferences. Google (GOOG) even scans email content to deliver ads that better fit users' interests.
Surely the FCC has more important issues to tackle than this one. The recent spike in product placement is a natural response to a technology that renders traditional advertising ineffective.
If consumers are unable to discern between a prominently displayed soda can and a 30-second ad spot, advertisers should consider theirs a job well done.
The information on this website solely reflects the analysis of or opin=
=3D =3D3D ion about the performance of securities and financial markets by =
the wr=3D iter=3D3D s whose articles appear on the site. The views expresse=
d by the wri=3D ters are=3D3D not necessarily the views of Minyanville Medi=
a, Inc. or members=3D of its man=3D3D agement. Nothing contained on the web=
site is intended to con=3D stitute a recom=3D3D mendation or advice address=
ed to an individual investor =3D or category of inve=3D3D stors to purchase=
, sell or hold any security, or to =3D take any action with re=3D3D spect t=
o the prospective movement of the securit=3D ies markets or to solicit t=3D=
3D he purchase or sale of any security. Any inv=3D estment decisions must b=
e made =3D3D by the reader either individually or in =3D consultation with =
his or her invest=3D3D ment professional. Minyanville write=3D rs and staff=
may trade or hold position=3D3D s in securities that are discuss=3D ed in =
articles appearing on the website. Wr=3D3D iters of articles are requir=3D =
ed to disclose whether they have a position in =3D3D any stock or fund disc=
us=3D sed in an article, but are not permitted to disclos=3D3D e the size o=
r direct=3D ion of the position. Nothing on this website is intende=3D3D d =
to solicit bus=3D iness of any kind for a writer's business or fund. Mi=
ny=3D3D anville mana=3D gement and staff as well as contributing writers wi=
ll not respo=3D3D nd to em=3D ails or other communications requesting inves=
Copyright 2011 Minyanville Media, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Daily Recap Newsletter