NBC Abandons Former Brand, Former Fans

By Mike Schuster Jul 07, 2009 12:50 pm
Sci Fi Network is latest in cable rebranding spree.
  • Share this article:
  • A- A A+
Later today, Dave Howe -- president of NBC Universal's (GE) SyFy Channel -- and stars from some of the network's series will ring the NASDAQ's (NDX) closing bell to commemorate the rebranding of the Sci-Fi Channel, which occurred this morning.

For true science-fiction fans, the celebration will seem as surreal as the applause that occurs even if the market drops 200 points.

Fans' ire has been high since March, when the network's remaining viewers -- already disillusioned by the addition of ECW Wrestling (WWE) and Braveheart to the programming schedule -- rolled their eyes after hearing of the name change. Any hope that the new season's lineup would return to the genre to which the channel was originally devoted was dashed in a torrent of corporate-speak. 

Discussing the shift with TV Week, Howe said, "It made us feel much cooler, much more cutting-edge, much more hip, which was kind of bang-on what we wanted to achieve communication-wise."

Eloquently put. And it gets worse.

Tim Brooks -- who was an integral part of the Sci Fi Channel's launch -- confirmed suspicions that the network has been distancing itself from science fiction since the 1990s.

He told TV Week, "The name Sci Fi has been associated with geeks and dysfunctional, antisocial boys in their basements with video games and stuff like that, as opposed to the general public and the female audience in particular."

Fittingly, Brooks made that comment just before the release of this year's Star Trek -- a film adaptation of the most unabashedly geektastic sci-fi series of all time. Earning $375 million worldwide, it clearly wasn't just a hit with basement-dwelling nerds.

But SyFy's shift toward a broader market is ultimately incidental. The main objective was always a unique, exclusive, and profitable copyrighted brand.

"We need an umbrella brand we can attach to new businesses: Sci Fi games, Sci Fi kids. It does no use to attach 'Sci Fi,' because there are hundreds of sci-fi websites and sci-fi publications. So it's changing your name without changing your name," Howe admitted.

The change also reflects some of the biggest rebranding efforts cable television has ever seen. Driven by a surge in ratings in recent years, cable-programming executives have been scrambling to lose the niche programming and focus on more mainstream fare.

Last year, the OJ-indebted Court TV was rechristened truTV (TWX) and took on a more global, gruesome-criminal-investigation focus: No longer bound to the courtroom, it can now rove freely over any muddy ditch, rusty oil barrel, or suburban basement in which a human body might be found.

Similarly, the formerly Hitler-centric History Channel is now shifting to the sort of UFO-themed programming once confined to Unsolved Mysteries -- a kind of history most teachers aren't aware of.

And A&E Network airs Gene Simmons: Family Jewels nearly around the clock, confirming that they no longer have any interest in either "arts" or "entertainment."

Even the Cartoon Network is about to roll out several live-action programs, for crying out loud.

While the Internet offers a vast array of online series in an unlimited variety of genres, networks are still unwilling to fulfill a viewer's penchant for something completely different. And, unless SyFy remembers the fans who originally made it popular, its dwindling audience will continue to associate the brand with something it didn't intend: unimaginative and forgettable programming.

Then again, they could always rename it Sigh Fi.

Join Hoofy and Boo for their unique look at rebranding:

< Previous
  • 1
Next >
No positions in stocks mentioned.
The information on this website solely reflects the analysis of or opinion about the performance of securities and financial markets by the writers whose articles appear on the site. The views expressed by the writers are not necessarily the views of Minyanville Media, Inc. or members of its management. Nothing contained on the website is intended to constitute a recommendation or advice addressed to an individual investor or category of investors to purchase, sell or hold any security, or to take any action with respect to the prospective movement of the securities markets or to solicit the purchase or sale of any security. Any investment decisions must be made by the reader either individually or in consultation with his or her investment professional. Minyanville writers and staff may trade or hold positions in securities that are discussed in articles appearing on the website. Writers of articles are required to disclose whether they have a position in any stock or fund discussed in an article, but are not permitted to disclose the size or direction of the position. Nothing on this website is intended to solicit business of any kind for a writer's business or fund. Minyanville management and staff as well as contributing writers will not respond to emails or other communications requesting investment advice.


(6)
2009-07-07 09:56:49
The SciFi channel is really stooping low with the type of GARBAGE shown these days. Someone needs to learn what your viewers want - or, does not anyone care?
I am 68 and my wife is 62. We have been watching REAL SCI FI since we were kids.
As far as continuing to view your channel, that is out.
You have lost us as viewers.
2009-07-07 13:29:01
The Sign
Indeed, some would take this re-branding as the sign of the apocalypse.

Down and down we spiral in the never ending quest to find the lowest common denominator. Clearly we have further to fall than the descent to wrestling would indicate.
2009-07-07 14:10:05
How about the "DotCom.Dead" Network?
Do you remember the transitions from NTN, "The Nashville Network" to NTN, "The National Network", which later morphed into "Spike TV"?

Vying for "young adult males"?

With the slogan "the first network for men".

Personally, I still have never understood how the GOLF CHANNEL has remained on the air, as part of basic cable, since 1991, now available to 100 million households around the world!

And now we have specialized separate year round channels for Soccer, Football, Baseball, and Basketball.

While the Playboy channel flounders!

I am waiting for the debut of the BD/SM channel... and I have the perfect slogan for them, "Programming That is Bound to Please"

2009-07-07 16:24:34
Who thinks this is a good idea?
So the same move toward edu-tainment that ruined the increasingly innacurately-named History Channel will now be applied to the former Sci Fi channel, and insult their faithful viewers in the bargain, and compete for the same dwindling number of viewers who have not given up on the medium. This is why I haven't watched network TV in ~ 10 or more years, and don't subscribe to newspapaers (look how well they're doing). All media seem focused on competing for a decreasing slice of a shrinking pie, while the majority look elsewhere for information and entertainment. Sad for us, stupid for them.
2009-07-07 21:43:52
This is the exact opposite direction in which they should be going. The money and margin are in the profitable niches you can dominate and guarantee eyeballs of a given demographic. There is value in good original content relevant to your targeted audience. But, it only works if you can get the revenue. Perhaps the advertising dollars just aren't there anymore for cable channels to provide good original content. Perhaps the solution is to not be on cable.
2009-07-08 17:04:43
SifFy
If I could short the SifFy channel I would. The addition of ECW to the lineup was the turning point. After that came the addition of more garbage, and the end of the few decent shows. Some of the forum members here on Minyanville write better science fiction (and fantasy) than anything on Siffy.

This is one network whose value might drop all the way to zero.
Subject:
Comment:
Get real-time options trading ideas from Steve Smith, veteran options trader and newsletter author, plus let him show you the way to cut risk and boost your returns through the strategic use of options.  Click here for a free 14 day trial to OptionSmith by Steve Smith.