The Rise of A New Asset Class
What works in investments about to change forever.
The Rise of a New Asset Class
I think we're at a watershed moment -- what Peter Bernstein defines as an "epochal event" -- with the very order of the investment world changing as it did in 1929, in 1950, in 1981, where a number of things came together. Not just one thing but a number of events that conspired to change the nature of what worked in the investment world going forward.
It took most people a decade after 1981-1982 to recognize that we were in a different period, because we make future expectations out of past experience. It's very hard for us to recognize a watershed moment as it's happening. We're going to look back in 5 or 10 years and go, "Wow, things changed." As we'll see, this change is going to cost people in their portfolios - and in their retirement habits.
We're going to look at a number of different concepts and separate ideas that in and of themselves don't make much difference. But I think their confluence in the present moment is going to change things.
Now, some of this is new; some of it's old. The old stuff, we're going to fly through. Most of you have been reading me for a while now, and you've got the concepts down. So let's start.
The first thing to note is that we're in a "muddle-through economy." We're in a recession fueled by the bursting of 2 bubbles: The housing bubble and the credit crisis. The real question is: When do we come out of the recession? At what time do we come back to trend growth, which is 3 to 3.5% per year?
I believe that over the next 20 years the US economy will grow at a rate of roughly 3%compounded, in real terms. But I believe that we'll have some headwinds for the next year or two. So I think the real bottom of this economic cycle will be in the fourth quarter of this year, possibly going into the first quarter of next year. But it'll take 2 years, for reasons we're going to get into, to get back to long-term trend growth. It will take much longer than normal because the things that created the problem -- the housing bubble and the credit crisis -- aren't things that can respond to Fed policy or to normal cycles. It's going to take a long time to work through these.
First, we had an investor-driven transaction bubble in housing. There were 48% more houses built since 2005 than should have been built, if you were simply looking at trends.
Click to enlarge
What that means is there are 3.5 million homes we have to work through. Now, that means that the 800,000 or 900,000 homes that we're now building a year, is going to go down to 400,000. It's going to take some time to work through those excess homes - for prices to drop enough that people can go in and buy them or rent them. We're probably talking 2011 before we finally work through this housing crisis and get back to a normal market where housing contributes significantly to GDP growth.
Click to enlarge
Sales activity is probably going to correct another 30%. That's not fun. By the middle to the end of this year, sales are going to be really low. As a side issue, those of you who like to invest in real estate and actually want to own a home to rent are going to have some good opportunities.
Click to enlarge
Let's look at the credit crisis very quickly. We vaporized 60% to the shadow banking system, the SIVs and CDOs, the people who actually bought US mortgages, who bought student loans, who bought credit cards, who bought car loans. That's gone and it's never coming back. As we'll see, it's going to take well into the next decade for us to create a completely new infrastructure to replace the broken one.
It took decades to get where we were last year. I don't think it will take decades to recover, but it's going to take five, six, seven years. That means things are going to be difficult if you want to borrow money. Credit spreads are going to be wider; it's going to affect you more. By the way, if you're in business, if you're paying more, it's going to put pressure on your profits.
Let's look at GDP growth for the last ten years, with and without mortgage equity withdrawal (MEW).
Click to enlarge
Without MEW, we would have had 2 years, 2001 and 2002, with negative GDP growth. We're not going to go get those levels of mortgage equity withdrawals today - not in this environment. We're still seeing some cash-out borrowing, but it's getting more and more difficult; as home values drop, there are going to be fewer and fewer people pulling less and less money out of the "home ATMs." As Paul McCulley says, your home ATM is starting to spit out negative twenty-dollar bills.
That means consumer spending is going to continue to slow. We haven't had a consumer recession since 1990-91. There are a lot of people today who've kind of forgotten that consumer spending can actually slow down. That's going to happen from lower mortgage equity withdrawals, and it's going to happen because of higher gas and energy costs that are displacing normal spending. You've got to fill up your Ford F-150 to be able to get to work.
I saw $4 a gallon gasoline when we arrived in La Jolla. I mean, I guess around here people don't really pay attention, but that means it would cost a hundred bucks to fill up my big SUV. That's just a lot of money. That's $100 I can't spend on other things - on clothes or kids or education. It means I'm going to be consuming less.
We're in a recession. Recessions by definition mean that we're going to be seeing rising unemployment. We're already up past 5.5%. We'll probably see 6% and maybe higher.
We're not going to see 9% or 10%, the way we did in the '70s or '80s, because we're not as subject to the manufacturing cycle as we were back then. That's both good and bad. We don't have that boom-bust in the manufacturing world. We're seeing a bust in the construction world and we're starting to see commercial lending and commercial building go down.
But I don't think we're going to see the large 8% and 9% unemployment rates that we typically see in a recession. But still, if you see rising unemployment -- and unemployment has risen 20%, from 5% to 6% -- that means those people are going to have less money and they're not going to be spending it.
We're seeing inflation in an environment of low real-income growth. Inflation is running over 4% now. Real-income growth is running a little bit less. While we may see some nominal growth in consumer spending, real spending is going to be dropping over the next year. That has some consequences we'll talk about later.
Consumer spending is going to drop because easy credit is less available. Now, it probably hasn't hit this room. But there's a wave of letters going out from credit card companies, cutting people's credit lines, cutting people's home mortgage lines. There are a lot of people actually hitting their home equity credit lines and putting it in a savings account because they're afraid that it's going away. They're afraid that they may not be able to get the cash when they need it. "What happens if I lose my job? I better get the cash, and I'll pay the difference in interest costs just to make sure that I'm OK." That's happening a lot.
In summary, lower mortgage equity withdrawals, higher gas and energy costs, rising unemployment, inflation in an environment of low real-income growth and less availability of cheap and easy credit are all contributing factors to slowing consumer spending.
This has 3 major effects. First, lower corporate earnings. We're in a period where earnings disappointments are going to be the rule and not the exception. We're going to go into this in detail in just a little bit.
But General Electric (GE) wasn't a one-off announcement. Yes, it was their financial system. But we're going to see a lot of earnings disappointments from all sorts of retailers, from all sorts of companies, for a variety of reasons. Second, lower corporate profits put pressure on the stock market. There's a relationship between earnings, valuations, and stock prices. And third, that also means we're going to see lower than expected long-term returns. That's going to be a problem for people who are looking for traditional assets to be the bulk of the growth for their retirement portfolios.
Now, I think we're still in a bear market. Remember that in 2000 and 2001, we had 3 corrections of over +20% percent and one in the +30% range. It's not unusual to see large corrections inside an overall bear market.
Why do I think we're in a bear market? Long-term markets -- and we're going to talk long term for a second and then come to the shorter term -- long-term markets in bear cycles have several characteristics. Number one, they all start with high P/E ratios. Now, Vitaliy Katsenelson, who wrote my e-letter this week so that I could be here, lays out what he calls "cowardly lion markets," as distinct from bear markets, because stocks tend to go sideways for a long period of time. We'll talk about why that is in a minute, but I think he's right on that.
You're told that you should invest for the long run. For a lot of people, 20 years is the long run. However, what they don't tell you is that you can see negative real stock market returns over 20 years. It's happened four or five times. So when you're reading some book that says, "Hey, stocks are going to compound at 11% per year" or whatever la-la number can be deduced from the data, think twice.
Click to enlarge
In secular bear markets, you can have returns for long periods of time from zero to 3% every 15 to 30 years. We're kind of starting one here again. If you went to Standard and Poor's website in March of 2007 and asked what the earnings were going to be for 2008, you wouldn have seen their analysts saying that earnings would be $92 for 2008. In December of 2007, they were projecting $84. In February 2008, it was $71.20. Today, Merrill Lynch (MER) estimates that earnings could drop to as low as $45 next year. Notice a trend here?
When you go into a recession, analysts begin to project lower earnings. They keep ratcheting them down. What do they use to project future earnings? Past performance. There are very few analysts who actually go out and say, "OK, how is this company going to perform in a recession?" They all say, "The company that I cover is an exception." This is how they're going to cover it, because they're talking to management.
And when's the last time management said, "Oh man, we're really going to get clobbered; there's a recession coming." Not if they want to keep their jobs. John Chambers will be telling us that Cisco's going to be doing wonderfully, just like he did in all of 1999, all of 2000 and all of 2001.
Now, what does this mean for P/E ratios? About 30 days ago, it was estimated, based on prices, that the P/E ratio for the end of the last quarter would be 20.5. Today, as companies mark their earnings down, the P/E ratio is 22.5. For the end of September, third quarter, a month ago, they were saying the P/E ratio would be 21. Today they're projecting that if the market stayed at the same price, it would be 28. Now, does anyone think we're going to see a P/E ratio of 28 at the end of the third quarter? People are going to be projecting positive earnings forward – and we're going to see one earnings surprise after another.
Remember, it takes 3 or 4 earnings disappointments to reach a point where investors really begin to understand that things are different, because we project future performance from past performance. When past performance disappoints us three or four times, then we begin to project negative performance, and that's when the stock market drops. It's not that the stock market is telling us that things are going to be better. It's that we have expectations of things getting better because that's what our past experience has been – so we need those disappointments.
This is from Vitaliy Katsenelson's book: "If you take 10-year trailing P/Es -- you average them together so you don't have the effect of just one year -- you find that valuations go from high to low from where bull markets start, in what he calls a range-bound market or what I would call a secular bear."
Click to enlarge
They go from high valuations to low valuations and back. Around 2000, we were at 48. It's down to 30 today on those long, 10-year runs, and it always corrects below the mean. Valuations are mean-reverting machines.
Click to enlarge
If you just look at one year, you get the same effect. You have a P/E average of 15 – remember they're projecting 28. You don't have a projection of 28 in a recession and not have the stock market feel that.
Maine, Maryland, and Weddings
It takes a full day to get from Texas to Leen's Lodge in Grand Lake Stream, Maine. My son Trey and I make the last part of the trip by float plane. This is the third time I've gone with Trey, and I really look forward to the trip. It's just a great bunch of guys. As I have noted, we do make predictions about the markets. Last year, a number of readers sent in their predictions, and we have tabulated those. I will report back on how well we all did, and some of you will win a book for being the best predictors.
It looks like I am going to Maryland for a day in a few weeks, and New York is looming on the horizon again, as well as another trip to Baltimore to be with my really good friend Bill Bonner (of Daily Reckoning fame) for his 60th birthday party. Now, that should be a blast.
It is amazing how many details have to be worked out for a wedding. And it is just a few days away. Tiffani will be gone on her honeymoon for almost an entire month, so a lot of business details have to be worked out for the interim. She and Ryan will be in South Africa and Ireland, and I really do want to leave her alone. She deserves some time away. When she comes back, we will really start to work on our book.
Have a great week. Enjoy the summer with friends and family.
Your ready for some fishing analyst,
The information on this website solely reflects the analysis of or opinion about the performance of securities and financial markets by the writers whose articles appear on the site. The views expressed by the writers are not necessarily the views of Minyanville Media, Inc. or members of its management. Nothing contained on the website is intended to constitute a recommendation or advice addressed to an individual investor or category of investors to purchase, sell or hold any security, or to take any action with respect to the prospective movement of the securities markets or to solicit the purchase or sale of any security. Any investment decisions must be made by the reader either individually or in consultation with his or her investment professional. Minyanville writers and staff may trade or hold positions in securities that are discussed in articles appearing on the website. Writers of articles are required to disclose whether they have a position in any stock or fund discussed in an article, but are not permitted to disclose the size or direction of the position. Nothing on this website is intended to solicit business of any kind for a writer's business or fund. Minyanville management and staff as well as contributing writers will not respond to emails or other communications requesting investment advice.
Copyright 2011 Minyanville Media, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Daily Recap Newsletter