CDS Investors Shouldn't Pay for Being Right
Punishing them not part of the solution.
Indeed, her argument is inconsistent. She rightly blames institutions that sold these insurance policies on corporate debt too cheaply for much of the trouble that followed.
I will take it one step further. The asset allocators who bought into those hedge funds which were selling cheap CDSs were often doing so with borrowed money, creating multiple layers of leverage on an intrinsically flawed premise. Two or 3 years ago, these asset allocators were pulling money out of investors who saw that insurance was too cheap and were buying it, sustaining consistent but minor losses as time passed and bankruptcies didn't threaten.
The problem is Ms. Morgenson's solution: Penalizing those who were trying to sound the warning signal -- that credit risk was being priced too cheaply -- by buying the swaps. Had we paid more attention to these folks a few years ago, we might not be in this situation now. At the same time, Ms. Morgenson wants to tear up the losing trades made by those who were being most irresponsible throughout the credit bubble - in effect giving the culprits a huge do-over.
This is conceptually not unlike bailing out homeowners who overextended themselves with mortgages they would only be able to afford in the sunniest of circumstances. But from a policy perspective, it's much worse. Trying to keep people in their homes, and working with them to minimize past mistakes, is one thing. Telling a bunch of "investors" that we'll tear up their losing trades, inspired by momentum and crowd-following and a lack of independent thought, is far worse. It's more akin to the poorly reasoned and ill-fated ban on short-selling of financial stocks, which the SEC now readily admits was a big mistake (as many voices were shouting at the time it was implemented).
One of the worst parts of the idea of voiding CDS trades is that they may have been used for many kinds of hedges, not just the obvious ones involving the underlying debt. Ms. Morgenson's approach doesn't even begin to address this. Once again, those who may have been using the CDSs prudently will be punished.
The desire to make "the gamblers," as Ms. Morgenson describes investors who speculated on CDSs, pay for the nation's troubles. makes good populist reading. But it doesn't make financial sense.
The information on this website solely reflects the analysis of or opinion about the performance of securities and financial markets by the writers whose articles appear on the site. The views expressed by the writers are not necessarily the views of Minyanville Media, Inc. or members of its management. Nothing contained on the website is intended to constitute a recommendation or advice addressed to an individual investor or category of investors to purchase, sell or hold any security, or to take any action with respect to the prospective movement of the securities markets or to solicit the purchase or sale of any security. Any investment decisions must be made by the reader either individually or in consultation with his or her investment professional. Minyanville writers and staff may trade or hold positions in securities that are discussed in articles appearing on the website. Writers of articles are required to disclose whether they have a position in any stock or fund discussed in an article, but are not permitted to disclose the size or direction of the position. Nothing on this website is intended to solicit business of any kind for a writer's business or fund. Minyanville management and staff as well as contributing writers will not respond to emails or other communications requesting investment advice.
Copyright 2011 Minyanville Media, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Daily Recap Newsletter