Free Cash Flow
Gauging the value creating power of an enterprise.
Editor's note: This missive is the second of a series on valuing securities (here's the first one). Those new to financial markets can find more content with an educational bent at Minyanville's Education page.
Confusion that never stops
The closing walls and the ticking clocks
Gonna come back and take you home
I could not stop, that you now know
In a previous missive we examined the 'discounted cash flow' method for valuing a stream of future cash payments. This method comes in handy when estimating the intrinsic value of stocks. Fundamentally, buying stock in a company like Procter & Gamble (PG) is not unlike the cash exchange proposition we discussed last time. Viewed through this lens, you're trying to determine how much money to lay out today for shares of PG in light of the perceived potential for a stream of cash that could flow your way as a shareholder.
Operationalizing this method requires an estimate of future cash flows coming to you from the corporation. Dividend payouts represent a concrete expression of cash flowing to shareholders on a routine basis. However, many companies, even established ones like Berkshire Hathaway (BRK.A) and Cisco Systems (CSCO), don't pay dividends. Moreover, there has been a secular corporate trend towards reducing dividend payouts in favor of retaining earnings for internal projects.
As such, I like to value securities using measures of free cash flow. Free cash flow (FCF) is cash flow in excess of that required to fund all projects that have positive net present values when discounted at the relevant cost of capital (Jensen, 1986: 323). Stated another way, it's the cash that is 'free' for distribution to shareholders after all investments have been financed (Stewart, 1991: xvii).
The most common expression of FCF is as follows:
free cash flow (FCF) = cash flow from operations - capital expenditures
I prefer FCF for a number of reasons. Fundamentally, it helps answer an essential question that should be on investors' minds: "Based on the capital that goes into an enterprise, how much can I get out?" Moreover, measures of FCF are less influenced by accounting tricks that often distort earnings numbers on income statements. Free cash flow tends to be a reasonable gauge of the true value creating power of an enterprise.
FCF approaches using the equation above are less effective when operating cash flows or capital expenditures do not accurately reflect inflows and outflows central to the ongoing enterprise. Financial firms, for instance, commonly employ sources of capital that are not considered capital expenditures by accounting standards. Adjustments must be made to render FCF meaningful in such situations.
It should also be noted that negative FCF might not be a bad thing. For example, young enterprises such as SunPower Corporation (SPWR) often invest heavily in the present with an eye towards creating value in the future. From a discounted cash flow perspective, the challenge becomes forecasting the size and timing of future FCF values.
We'll take a look at some FCF examples in our next missive.
Jensen, M.C. (1986). Agency costs of free cash flow, corporate finance, and takeovers. Amercian Economic Review, 76: 323-329.
Stewart, G.B., III (1991). The quest for value. New York: HarperCollins.
The information on this website solely reflects the analysis of or opinion about the performance of securities and financial markets by the writers whose articles appear on the site. The views expressed by the writers are not necessarily the views of Minyanville Media, Inc. or members of its management. Nothing contained on the website is intended to constitute a recommendation or advice addressed to an individual investor or category of investors to purchase, sell or hold any security, or to take any action with respect to the prospective movement of the securities markets or to solicit the purchase or sale of any security. Any investment decisions must be made by the reader either individually or in consultation with his or her investment professional. Minyanville writers and staff may trade or hold positions in securities that are discussed in articles appearing on the website. Writers of articles are required to disclose whether they have a position in any stock or fund discussed in an article, but are not permitted to disclose the size or direction of the position. Nothing on this website is intended to solicit business of any kind for a writer's business or fund. Minyanville management and staff as well as contributing writers will not respond to emails or other communications requesting investment advice.
Copyright 2011 Minyanville Media, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Daily Recap Newsletter