No V-Shaped Recovery
By Peter Atwater Jan 05, 2009 2:43 pm
Without foresight, L-shaped aftermath may occur.
This weekend, Barron’s declared the existence of a Treasury bubble, encouraging its readers to consider high yield municipal and corporate bonds as an alternative. Everywhere I turn, I find another market pundit suggesting the equity market has bottomed, or the commodity bust is over.
And -- for a short-term trade -- I don’t necessarily disagree.
But for one to believe we have truly bottomed at this point, you have to believe in a V-shaped recovery.
Put simply, I don’t. In fact, I am somewhere between a U- and an L-shaped recovery - certainly nowhere near a “V.”
But rather than beat old drums, (See Don't Believe the Hype, The No-No Years and Economy Still in Coma for more), let me offer a new thought.
The following is a list of the world’s 25 largest financial institutions as of the end of 2007:

I hope it's immediately clear that every one of these firms has been adversely affected by the current crisis - some enormously so. By my count, 4 have been fully nationalized; all the rest have received what I consider to be “controlling” interests by their home governments.
More importantly, these firms -- along with maybe another 10 or 15 financial-services firms (all of whom have been similarly affected), dominate the global credit markets and represent somewhere between 60% and 75% of the world’s total lending capacity.
So, to put things very simply: Credit = government, at least until further notice.
While I will leave it to others to debate whether this outcome is a just reward for management negligence, at best -- or malfeasance, at worst -- like it or not, strategic decisions for these firms and their ilk aren't going to be made by private-sector capitalists on Wall Street or in Canary Wharf. Instead, they'll be made by the public servants of the largest governments around the world.
And here's where the rubber meets the road - or doesn’t, as the case may be.
In watching the behavior of governments worldwide, it appears their general operating principle right now comes from A Field of Dreams: “If we build it, they will come.” That is, if banks would just make money available, people would borrow anew, and the global economy would quickly recover.
But the bubble that just burst was a credit bubble, and more credit isn't going to make everything better. banks need to recognize their losses and rebuild capital, so that they will ultimately be in a position to lend when asset prices finish falling.
In the hands of government, however, I highly doubt this will happen anytime soon - particularly as loss recognition calls the adequacy of government oversight into question. Instead, under government influence, we will do whatever we can to postpone our losses.
Having spent a considerable amount of time in Japan during the early 1990s, I watched this happen firsthand and in real time: Bankers and bureaucrats both unwilling to face reality for fear of losing face. It was immensely frustrating, but it gave me great insight into how governments handle large-scale crises.
So, to all those declaring a market bottom: You are putting your fate in the hands of government. As for me, with history as my guide, I will gladly sit this one out - and watch “V” become “U,” and, if we aren’t careful, “L.”
And -- for a short-term trade -- I don’t necessarily disagree.
But for one to believe we have truly bottomed at this point, you have to believe in a V-shaped recovery.
Put simply, I don’t. In fact, I am somewhere between a U- and an L-shaped recovery - certainly nowhere near a “V.”
But rather than beat old drums, (See Don't Believe the Hype, The No-No Years and Economy Still in Coma for more), let me offer a new thought.
The following is a list of the world’s 25 largest financial institutions as of the end of 2007:

I hope it's immediately clear that every one of these firms has been adversely affected by the current crisis - some enormously so. By my count, 4 have been fully nationalized; all the rest have received what I consider to be “controlling” interests by their home governments.
More importantly, these firms -- along with maybe another 10 or 15 financial-services firms (all of whom have been similarly affected), dominate the global credit markets and represent somewhere between 60% and 75% of the world’s total lending capacity.
So, to put things very simply: Credit = government, at least until further notice.
While I will leave it to others to debate whether this outcome is a just reward for management negligence, at best -- or malfeasance, at worst -- like it or not, strategic decisions for these firms and their ilk aren't going to be made by private-sector capitalists on Wall Street or in Canary Wharf. Instead, they'll be made by the public servants of the largest governments around the world.
And here's where the rubber meets the road - or doesn’t, as the case may be.
In watching the behavior of governments worldwide, it appears their general operating principle right now comes from A Field of Dreams: “If we build it, they will come.” That is, if banks would just make money available, people would borrow anew, and the global economy would quickly recover.
But the bubble that just burst was a credit bubble, and more credit isn't going to make everything better. banks need to recognize their losses and rebuild capital, so that they will ultimately be in a position to lend when asset prices finish falling.
In the hands of government, however, I highly doubt this will happen anytime soon - particularly as loss recognition calls the adequacy of government oversight into question. Instead, under government influence, we will do whatever we can to postpone our losses.
Having spent a considerable amount of time in Japan during the early 1990s, I watched this happen firsthand and in real time: Bankers and bureaucrats both unwilling to face reality for fear of losing face. It was immensely frustrating, but it gave me great insight into how governments handle large-scale crises.
So, to all those declaring a market bottom: You are putting your fate in the hands of government. As for me, with history as my guide, I will gladly sit this one out - and watch “V” become “U,” and, if we aren’t careful, “L.”
Position in SDS
The information on this website solely reflects the analysis of or opinion about the performance of securities and financial markets by the writers whose articles appear on the site. The views expressed by the writers are not necessarily the views of Minyanville Media, Inc. or members of its management. Nothing contained on the website is intended to constitute a recommendation or advice addressed to an individual investor or category of investors to purchase, sell or hold any security, or to take any action with respect to the prospective movement of the securities markets or to solicit the purchase or sale of any security. Any investment decisions must be made by the reader either individually or in consultation with his or her investment professional. Minyanville writers and staff may trade or hold positions in securities that are discussed in articles appearing on the website. Writers of articles are required to disclose whether they have a position in any stock or fund discussed in an article, but are not permitted to disclose the size or direction of the position. Nothing on this website is intended to solicit business of any kind for a writer's business or fund. Minyanville management and staff as well as contributing writers will not respond to emails or other communications requesting investment advice.
Copyright 2009 Minyanville Media, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Copyright 2009 Minyanville Media, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
(3)
Reply
2009-01-05 17:49:23
Government intervention
They are doing exactly what you shouldn't do for trading/investing
run the winners and cut the losers early.
The Fed and the rest are running the losers as long as possible and not caring about any winners..
savers and sensible people are scorned and penalised.
So what should I do... make sure I make lots of mistakes .. I will get richly rewarded by those standards
run the winners and cut the losers early.
The Fed and the rest are running the losers as long as possible and not caring about any winners..
savers and sensible people are scorned and penalised.
So what should I do... make sure I make lots of mistakes .. I will get richly rewarded by those standards
2009-01-06 00:25:14
Banks Not Lending?
It's interesting that everyone is complaining about the banks not lending even though rates are so low and they have the blessings of the global governments.
They are not lending because they suspect that something is wrong.
These banks are still private even though they now opperate with public funds.
I for one am glad they don't lend; I am glad the credit markets are still frozen. It telegraphs to me that the private "deciders" get it.
Too bad most of the governments didn't get the memo!
Minyan Terry
They are not lending because they suspect that something is wrong.
These banks are still private even though they now opperate with public funds.
I for one am glad they don't lend; I am glad the credit markets are still frozen. It telegraphs to me that the private "deciders" get it.
Too bad most of the governments didn't get the memo!
Minyan Terry
2009-01-07 08:36:15
Banks Not Lending?
In addition, who are they going to lend to? There choice is limited to lending to those irresponsible or incapable of handling credit risk in the first place because anyone that does not fall into that category does not want or does not need more debt in this situation. So, the Fed is force feeding the banks to engage in more of the poor risk control subprime lending that got us into this mess in the first place. That is not a recipe for success.
Get real-time options trading ideas from Steve Smith, veteran options trader and newsletter author, plus let him show you the way to cut risk and boost your returns through the strategic use of options. Click here for a free 14 day trial to OptionSmith by Steve Smith.
Copyright 2009 Minyanville Media, Inc. All Rights Reserved

















