Sorry!! The article you are trying to read is not available now.
Thank you very much;
you're only a step away from
downloading your reports.

Wells Fargo's $1.4 Billion Loan Loss


Capital impairment is everywhere and capital impairment is going to restrict the ability of banks to lend.


Wells Fargo (WFC) sets aside $1.4 bln to cover loan losses, tightens lending standards, and plans to liquidate $11.9 bln of its portfolio.

Wells Fargo & Co., the second-largest U.S. mortgage lender, said late Tuesday that it will set aside $1.4 billion during the fourth quarter to cover higher losses on home-equity loans caused by deterioration in the real-estate market.

....'We believe it's prudent to further tighten our standards, to stop acquiring new loans in these segments and to manage the portfolio as a liquidating, nonstrategic asset' said John Stumpf, CEO Wells Fargo.

The $11.9 billion of home loans that were acquired through outside sources will now be liquidated. The bank already has stopped buying home-equity loans through so-called correspondent relationships, which include other financial institutions and mortgage companies.

In one word this is what John Stumpf, CEO of Wells Fargo is describing: deflation. There is simply no other word for it.

Deflation is a decrease in money supply and credit. Wells Fargo is liquidating (cutting its losses in existing credit), while tightening lending standards for new credit.

Perhaps new credit at Wells Fargo exceeds the decrease in existing credit for a while, but the trend is clear and that trend is not just about Wells Fargo. Capital impairment is everywhere and capital impairment is going to restrict the ability of banks to lend whether Bernanke or anyone else likes it or not.

Take a look at Citigroup (C) as Petrodollars Return Home. Citigroup raised capital at 11% interest in a desperation move to restore its balance sheet yet it is presumably offering prime loans at 7.5%. How long can this keep this up?

Bernanke and everyone else who are focused on capacity utilization, oil prices, the U.S. dollar, wheat or food at the local grocery store are simply focused on the wrong things.

The correct focus is on the ability and willingness of banks to lend, and the ability and willingness of consumers and businesses to borrow. Everything else is a sideshow.

< Previous
  • 1
Next >
No positions in stocks mentioned.
The information on this website solely reflects the analysis of or opinion about the performance of securities and financial markets by the writers whose articles appear on the site. The views expressed by the writers are not necessarily the views of Minyanville Media, Inc. or members of its management. Nothing contained on the website is intended to constitute a recommendation or advice addressed to an individual investor or category of investors to purchase, sell or hold any security, or to take any action with respect to the prospective movement of the securities markets or to solicit the purchase or sale of any security. Any investment decisions must be made by the reader either individually or in consultation with his or her investment professional. Minyanville writers and staff may trade or hold positions in securities that are discussed in articles appearing on the website. Writers of articles are required to disclose whether they have a position in any stock or fund discussed in an article, but are not permitted to disclose the size or direction of the position. Nothing on this website is intended to solicit business of any kind for a writer's business or fund. Minyanville management and staff as well as contributing writers will not respond to emails or other communications requesting investment advice.

Copyright 2011 Minyanville Media, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Featured Videos