Deflation Still Clear and Present Danger
Or has it?
Superficial signs of renewed inflation are everywhere: Oil prices appear to be stabilizing, and concern is growing about future supply shortages (which, by extension, could lead to higher prices at the pump). The stock market has staged an impressive rally, with expectant bulls and former bears finding "green shoots" of economic growth everywhere. Home prices -- if you look purely at the data and ignore fundamentals -- are starting to slow their fantastic decline.
Even the consumer price index, or CPI, is looking tame. Well, except for last month's drop, the largest in more than 50 years.
And herein lies the problem.
The CPI, the market's favorite inflation gauge, has been masking the structural deflation in our midst since the housing market fell of its wheels almost 4 years ago. Given the precipitous drop in property values, one would naturally expect the housing component of the CPI to fall in kind. Not so.
The statistical alchemists, err, experts, at the Bureau of Labor Statistics use something called "owners equivalent rent," OER, to measure consumer housing expenses. OER tries to approximate the cost to rent the country's typical home, and according to the Wall Street Journal makes up 24% of the CPI and 31% of the core CPI, which backs out food and energy costs.
And since even as property values have slid in record-breaking fashion rents remained buoyant, OER has vastly understated the drop in home prices. This means the CPI -- were it to reflect some sort of economic reality -- would have fallen more than it actually has.
As the housing slump rolls on, the pain is increasingly being felt by landlords, not just owner occupiers. Rents in big cities like New York and San Francisco are already dropping, as would-be tenants demand concessions from property owners. Vacancies are increasing, as even those driven from the housing market by foreclosures and the tight mortgage market can't fill up empty apartments, condos and track homes.
Drive around suburbia and "For Rent" signs are nearly as common as "For Sale" signs.Rents are likely to keep falling and as a result, OER could begin to drag down the CPI. Of course, statisticians can and likely will play games with adjustments for volatile energy prices (renters often don't pay for utilities, so energy costs are backed out of OER). Further, government bean counters are even considering adapting OER to reflect new, high levels of home ownership (just in time for a reversion to the historic mean, thanks for being ahead of the curve guys).
As long as construing economic data in a way that makes it seem more likely for effectively insolvent financial institutions like Bank of America (BAC) and Citigroup (C) to raise capital and remain in business, that will remain the status quo.
Meanwhile, back in reality, saving is now en vogue, deleveraging is ongoing and the repayment (and destruction) of dollar-denominated debt will keep inflation in check for the foreseeable future. More importantly, the recognition that smaller can be better and less can be more are becoming entrenched in the lives of ordinary Americans.
Don't believe the hype: Deflation isn't going away any time soon.

The information on this website solely reflects the analysis of or opinion about the performance of securities and financial markets by the writers whose articles appear on the site. The views expressed by the writers are not necessarily the views of Minyanville Media, Inc. or members of its management. Nothing contained on the website is intended to constitute a recommendation or advice addressed to an individual investor or category of investors to purchase, sell or hold any security, or to take any action with respect to the prospective movement of the securities markets or to solicit the purchase or sale of any security. Any investment decisions must be made by the reader either individually or in consultation with his or her investment professional. Minyanville writers and staff may trade or hold positions in securities that are discussed in articles appearing on the website. Writers of articles are required to disclose whether they have a position in any stock or fund discussed in an article, but are not permitted to disclose the size or direction of the position. Nothing on this website is intended to solicit business of any kind for a writer's business or fund. Minyanville management and staff as well as contributing writers will not respond to emails or other communications requesting investment advice.
Copyright 2010 Minyanville Media, Inc. All Rights Reserved.



rents are definitely (finally) dropping, and condo sales are being done via auctions for "drastically" reduced prices
though the drasticness is more for the seller than the buyers yet ;-) as i still can't quite see myself going for the current (falling) prices....
nice article, thanks!
But falling rents will make this comparison much different ....
Great point -- you are right that OER under-reported the effect of home price appreciation on inflation. In terms of home ownership costs, exotic loans and low interest rates helped keep the real costs of owning homes low, even as prices were going up, but OER still missed the move -- especially when you factor in the cost of a massive looming mortgage and potential ARM reset.
I think ultimately the real effect of the fuzzy statistics is an lack of appreciation for how much real wealth was eroded on the way up (under-reporting of inflation) and a lack of appreciation for structural deflation on the way down (they'll likely change the method for counting OER right when rents really start to fall).
To me, the important structural shift is that Americans are (slowly) realizing that it's not sustainable to spend 50% or more of take home earnings on housing -- rental or mortgage. That will drive rents and home prices down to more sustainable levels, irrespective of what these contrived statistical measures report.
Hope that helps a bit,
Andrew
We do spend 50% take home almost exactly and I consider it to be too much. (To be fair, we are a 1ish income family. I work a very part time business for the ish part) Thanks to historical tight housing supplies, house prices in my area have always been somewhat high compared to wages. However, it's unreal how much brand new housing is still coming online with 2 miles of me. (And a local low-income housing trust is building more this summer!!)
Our plan is to be valuable (good tenants with maintenance skills) and check market prices in October when our leases comes up for renewal. I think/hope between the market and our treatment of the place, I can start to shave the rent down. Otherwise in a season or two I'm hoping that we could move for lower rent. (By golly that plan seems awfully deflationary...*grin*)
we sold our house back in oct 06, and have been renting since
i love yard work, but haven't missed it, knowing i'll get back to it later
each month, lately, i've seen rent prices drop on properties, nice ones, that two and a half years ago, we couldn't dream of renting
and being a great history tennant, never late with the rent, keep our place as our own in terms of cleanliness of notifying re upkeep, etc, is something we plan to tout too ;-)
best of luck!
We rent the top half of a house and so we have our yard work back. The amazing thing about the rents (which didn't really move here very much in the last decade) is that I now live an area that I can't afford to buy in at all. It's mind boggling what happened to housing prices in the last decade.
Anyway, good luck to you as well!
We're frustrated with land costs, too. Our family's"wants" in a house are very modest. We'd be happy with a double wide (or stick built equivalent) - 3 bedrooms, maybe 1.5 baths. We can buy a double-wide outright now, but the land costs are just insane. My amateur calculations suggest a building lot in one of the more rural areas around here should go for no more than $20K or $30K. Most people start at double that in asking price.
*head shake* There are days I wonder if people believe that you can drill for oil, too, on their plot of land. We just waiting it out, too.
Whenever I become too pessimistic and discouraged, I think of your posts and observations and you cheer me up. With young people like you we can't fail! I'm not kidding you or putting you on. I really appreciate your insight and creative energy. Best regards.
Seems he thinks that perhaps the Fed boys have their collective thumb on the scale. Question: Since the BLS is now effectively a rating agency with ownership common to a investment banking operation are they in compliance with SOx? Or, are they cooking up some business for their investment banking operation, the Fed? Don't see any meaningful firewall here.
It's hard to see that happening now, but then again, this effort is MANY times larger than that one. So what would deflation have wound up being? 3% for 4 years? 5% for 5? But this stimulus should more than double current prices, which means if deflation was 3% for 4 years - inflation may likely wind up being 5% for 8 years. However, since it's all hitting in a short time span it's likely to be 12% for 3 years - and after that it may continue.
The question is really "WHEN will this start?" In the meantime, yes, the deflationary aspects of the economic contraction will remain visible and active. But I'd give it 5-8 months and you'll see something quite different.
For the time being, take advantage of the "deflation". Go buy a Chrysler (or GM) car at fire sale prices (I wonder how the BLS will handle that) from a dealer that just got his contract revoked.





















