Titanic Blunder for Royal Caribbean
Purchase of largest cruise ship ever is mind-bogglingly misguided.
Royal Caribbean (RCL), the second largest cruise-ship operator in the world, is currently scrounging up money to purchase the Oasis of the Seas, a 5,400-passenger, 16-deck, $1.2 billion monstrosity under construction by STX Europe's Finnish shipyards. In normal times, the company would have no trouble assembling a team of lenders to finance the purchase. But now, with credit markets frozen solid, loans are more difficult to navigate than an ocean strewn with icebergs.
According to Bloomberg, Royal Caribbean is petitioning the Finnish government for help. Already, state-owned Finnerva has agreed to guarantee 80% of the loans needed to buy the Oasis and its sister ship, Allure of the Seas. The Finnish government says its given out larger guarantees in the past, but isn't terribly keen on this one unless circumstances are "exceptional."
Meanwhile, Royal Caribbean and rival Carnival Cruise Lines (CCL), are reeling from the economic slump and the worldwide decline in tourism. And with the likes of Citigroup (C) and Bank of America (BAC) becoming increasingly reliant on government funds for survival, extravagances like the biggest cruise ship ever built will be increasingly hard to justify.
The Finnish government's dilemma underscores a growing dilemma for countries all over the world: Prop up industries begging for federal assistance, or preserve funds and maintain the integrity of the sovereign balance sheet? Volatility in the foreign exchange markets (the yen's recent tumble, for example), is evidence that investors are becoming increasingly worried that government is getting out over its skis.
With tax revenues falling, trade grinding a halt, and social-program obligations ballooning, lawmakers are opting to take a more active role in economic governance. Many, in fact, are moving toward central economic planning.
This is an unwelcome shift, but one we're being told is necessary to stave off some unnamable economic catastrophe.
The similarities between the Titanic's moniker -- "unsinkable" -- and the belief that certain banks are too big to fail would be ironic, if it weren't so sad. Given that ill-fated vessel, we should be wary of the notion that anything is invincible - especially when the path through the icebergs is growing increasingly difficult to find.
The information on this website solely reflects the analysis of or opin=
=3D =3D3D ion about the performance of securities and financial markets by =
the wr=3D iter=3D3D s whose articles appear on the site. The views expresse=
d by the wri=3D ters are=3D3D not necessarily the views of Minyanville Medi=
a, Inc. or members=3D of its man=3D3D agement. Nothing contained on the web=
site is intended to con=3D stitute a recom=3D3D mendation or advice address=
ed to an individual investor =3D or category of inve=3D3D stors to purchase=
, sell or hold any security, or to =3D take any action with re=3D3D spect t=
o the prospective movement of the securit=3D ies markets or to solicit t=3D=
3D he purchase or sale of any security. Any inv=3D estment decisions must b=
e made =3D3D by the reader either individually or in =3D consultation with =
his or her invest=3D3D ment professional. Minyanville write=3D rs and staff=
may trade or hold position=3D3D s in securities that are discuss=3D ed in =
articles appearing on the website. Wr=3D3D iters of articles are requir=3D =
ed to disclose whether they have a position in =3D3D any stock or fund disc=
us=3D sed in an article, but are not permitted to disclos=3D3D e the size o=
r direct=3D ion of the position. Nothing on this website is intende=3D3D d =
to solicit bus=3D iness of any kind for a writer's business or fund. Mi=
ny=3D3D anville mana=3D gement and staff as well as contributing writers wi=
ll not respo=3D3D nd to em=3D ails or other communications requesting inves=
Copyright 2011 Minyanville Media, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Daily Recap Newsletter