Cart (0)
business newsTitanic Blunder for Royal Caribbean
Purchase of largest cruise ship ever is mind-bogglingly misguided.
PRINT
 |
|
Royal Caribbean (RCL), the second largest cruise-ship operator in the world, is currently scrounging up money to purchase the Oasis of the Seas, a 5,400-passenger, 16-deck, $1.2 billion monstrosity under construction by STX Europe’s Finnish shipyards. In normal times, the company would have no trouble assembling a team of lenders to finance the purchase. But now, with credit markets frozen solid, loans are more difficult to navigate than an ocean strewn with icebergs.
According to Bloomberg, Royal Caribbean is petitioning the Finnish government for help. Already, state-owned Finnerva has agreed to guarantee 80% of the loans needed to buy the Oasis and its sister ship, Allure of the Seas. The Finnish government says its given out larger guarantees in the past, but isn’t terribly keen on this one unless circumstances are "exceptional."
Meanwhile, Royal Caribbean and rival Carnival Cruise Lines (CCL), are reeling from the economic slump and the worldwide decline in tourism. And with the likes of Citigroup (C) and Bank of America (BAC) becoming increasingly reliant on government funds for survival, extravagances like the biggest cruise ship ever built will be increasingly hard to justify.
The Finnish government's dilemma underscores a growing dilemma for countries all over the world: Prop up industries begging for federal assistance, or preserve funds and maintain the integrity of the sovereign balance sheet? Volatility in the foreign exchange markets (the yen's recent tumble, for example), is evidence that investors are becoming increasingly worried that government is getting out over its skis.
With tax revenues falling, trade grinding a halt, and social-program obligations ballooning, lawmakers are opting to take a more active role in economic governance. Many, in fact, are moving toward central economic planning.
This is an unwelcome shift, but one we're being told is necessary to stave off some unnamable economic catastrophe.
The similarities between the Titanic's moniker -- "unsinkable" -- and the belief that certain banks are too big to fail would be ironic, if it weren't so sad. Given that ill-fated vessel, we should be wary of the notion that anything is invincible - especially when the path through the icebergs is growing increasingly difficult to find.
The information on this website solely reflects the analysis of or opinion about the performance of securities and financial markets by the writers whose articles appear on the site. The views expressed by the writers are not necessarily the views of Minyanville Media, Inc. or members of its management. Nothing contained on the website is intended to constitute a recommendation or advice addressed to an individual investor or category of investors to purchase, sell or hold any security, or to take any action with respect to the prospective movement of the securities markets or to solicit the purchase or sale of any security. Any investment decisions must be made by the reader either individually or in consultation with his or her investment professional. Minyanville writers and staff may trade or hold positions in securities that are discussed in articles appearing on the website. Writers of articles are required to disclose whether they have a position in any stock or fund discussed in an article, but are not permitted to disclose the size or direction of the position. Nothing on this website is intended to solicit business of any kind for a writer's business or fund. Minyanville management and staff as well as contributing writers will not respond to emails or other communications requesting investment advice.
Copyright 2011 Minyanville Media, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
