Op-Ed: Bernanke Tells Banks, "I've Got Your Back"
With cheap Fed funding, banks will recover quickly.
Ben Bernanke knows that all the monetary growth in the world won't amount to a hill of beans if the banking system isn't able to transform Fed liquidity into credit to households and businesses: As he said to the Senate Banking Committee, "If we're going to have a strong recovery, it has got to be on the back of a stabilization of the financial system. It is black and white."
And on Monday, Bernanke made it clearer than ever to the nations' banks and bank shareholders: "We need you up and running, and we've got your back."
Recently, in "Are US Banks Worthless," I argued that, at current prices, the balance of risk has shifted in favor of holders of banks' common equity. Banks have substantial cash-flow generating capacity, and over time, they can fully pay for the losses they've generated and still create value for common equity shareholders. In his remarks on Monday, Bernanke explicitly extolled US banks' "substantial franchise value."
The "franchise value" Bernanke referred to is code, I believe that the Fed recognizes the positive net present value described in both Are US Banks Worthless and Bank of America's War of Independence. Precisely because of the positive net present value of these franchises, Bernanke made it clear that nationalization is completely unnecessary and would be detrimental to the nation. Though some banks may be short of capital in the short term, Bernanke made it clear that the Fed stood ready to provide all the capital that the banks will need to work through their problems.
Bernanke signaled to the financial markets that common-equity shareholders need not worry about dilution from infusion of Fed capital, as the Fed wants nothing to do with ownership of banks, and essentially said that banks can take the money and repay it when they've gotten back on their feet - without having to give up an ownership stake.
Does this mean that banks and their shareholders are out of hot water? Minyan Peter argues that banks die from lack of deposits, not from lack of capital. In Minyan Peter's view, the risk is that depositors won't stick around long enough to allow the banks to earn their way out of the situation that they've gotten themselves into.
The information on this website solely reflects the analysis of or opinion about the performance of securities and financial markets by the writers whose articles appear on the site. The views expressed by the writers are not necessarily the views of Minyanville Media, Inc. or members of its management. Nothing contained on the website is intended to constitute a recommendation or advice addressed to an individual investor or category of investors to purchase, sell or hold any security, or to take any action with respect to the prospective movement of the securities markets or to solicit the purchase or sale of any security. Any investment decisions must be made by the reader either individually or in consultation with his or her investment professional. Minyanville writers and staff may trade or hold positions in securities that are discussed in articles appearing on the website. Writers of articles are required to disclose whether they have a position in any stock or fund discussed in an article, but are not permitted to disclose the size or direction of the position. Nothing on this website is intended to solicit business of any kind for a writer's business or fund. Minyanville management and staff as well as contributing writers will not respond to emails or other communications requesting investment advice.
Copyright 2011 Minyanville Media, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Daily Recap Newsletter