Sorry!! The article you are trying to read is not available now.
Thank you very much;
you're only a step away from
downloading your reports.

The Fed's Strange Policy

By

With inflation on the rise, Bernanke is looking for a way to reduce inflationary pressures without any further rate hikes.

PrintPRINT

Editor's Note: This article was written by Brian Wesbury and is being shared with the Minyanville community with hopes it adds value to your process.

Brian Wesbury received an M.B.A. from Northwestern University's Kellogg Graduate School of Management, and a B.A. in Economics from the University of Montana. He is a contributor to the editorial page at The Wall Street Journal, and appears regularly on CNBC, Fox and Bloomberg TV.

Wesbury is a member of the Academic Advisory Council of the Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago, and is also an Adjunct Professor of Economics at Wheaton College in Wheaton, Illinois. In 1995 and 1996, Wesbury served as Chief Economist for the Joint Economic Committee of the U.S. Congress. He has also served as Vice President and Economist for The Chicago Corporation and as Senior Vice President and Chief Economist at Griffin, Kubik, Stephens & Thompson, Inc.



If a Fed Chairman drops a bomb during testimony on Capitol Hill and nobody sees or hears it, was it really a bomb?

I ask this question because of the Q&A between Fed Chairman Ben Bernanke and Congressman Jim Saxton during last week's Joint Economic Committee hearing about the current stance of Fed policy.

In it, Chairman Bernanke said:

"We in general prefer not to give advance rate guidance - that is, not to tell the market we're going to do this, that and the other, rather it's better for the FOMC to describe our outlook and the risks we see to the outlook and let the markets make their own determination about how to price assets. And one aspect of this change has been to move away from forward rate guidance, which we view as being something that should be undertaken mostly under unusual circumstances."

In order to fully understand the meaning of this statement, it is necessary to go back in time to a famous speech on deflation given by then Fed Governor Bernanke in November 2002. This was the speech in which Bernanke talked about dropping money from helicopters, earning him the nickname "Helicopter Ben."

At the time of that speech the Fed had already dropped rates to 1.25%, economic growth was still slow and the Fed was fearful of deflation. In the speech Bernanke discussed options for fighting deflation without cutting the funds rate again, including the reduction of long-term interest rates in order to stimulate growth.

To do this the Fed would need to convince the markets that the future path of short-term rates was lower than the market currently thought. As Bernanke put it:

"Because long-term interest rates represent averages of current and expected future short-term rates...a commitment to keep short-term rates [very low]...would induce a decline in longer-term rates."

Starting in mid-2003, the Fed felt circumstances were "unusual" enough to begin telegraphing its moves, and it told the market that policy accommodation would be maintained for a "considerable period." As a result, long-term interests rates fell and the yield curve flattened.

Now, with inflation on the rise, Bernanke is looking for a way to reduce inflationary pressures without any further rate hikes. It sounds like he wants to accomplish this by becoming less transparent. By moving away from rate signaling, he hopes increased uncertainty (higher risk) about future short-term interest rates will push long-term rates higher.

This is a strange policy. I have no idea how it will work, but it appears to have already steepened the Treasury yield curve, and will probably result in even more steepening in the weeks and months ahead. In the end, however, the economy and inflation are both on track to be stronger than the market or the Fed expects. I continue to forecast rate hikes in the second-half of 2006, not rate cuts as the market still expects. If that occurs, amidst less rate signaling, long-term interest rates could finally move significantly higher.

< Previous
  • 1
Next >
No positions in stocks mentioned.

The information on this website solely reflects the analysis of or opinion about the performance of securities and financial markets by the writers whose articles appear on the site. The views expressed by the writers are not necessarily the views of Minyanville Media, Inc. or members of its management. Nothing contained on the website is intended to constitute a recommendation or advice addressed to an individual investor or category of investors to purchase, sell or hold any security, or to take any action with respect to the prospective movement of the securities markets or to solicit the purchase or sale of any security. Any investment decisions must be made by the reader either individually or in consultation with his or her investment professional. Minyanville writers and staff may trade or hold positions in securities that are discussed in articles appearing on the website. Writers of articles are required to disclose whether they have a position in any stock or fund discussed in an article, but are not permitted to disclose the size or direction of the position. Nothing on this website is intended to solicit business of any kind for a writer's business or fund. Minyanville management and staff as well as contributing writers will not respond to emails or other communications requesting investment advice.

Copyright 2011 Minyanville Media, Inc. All Rights Reserved.

PrintPRINT
 
Featured Videos

WHAT'S POPULAR IN THE VILLE