Sorry!! The article you are trying to read is not available now.
Thank you very much;
you're only a step away from
downloading your reports.

Ben and Alan's Excellent Adventure


Exactly how much influence does the FOMC have today?

On a boat in the middle of a raging sea
She would make a scene for it all to be ignored
And wouldn't you be bored?
-Strange Brew (Cream)

I wonder if John Galt asks "Who is Alan Greenspan?"

More revealing than Greenspan's mea culpa on 60 Minutes Sunday night regarding "Green Speak" obfuscation, which he acknowledged should be called "Fed Speak", was his nod to the notion that he is a social climber. To paraphrase Greenie: we all are looking for approval – it's not that he's guilty of being a social climber, it's that none of us are not guilty of wanting approval.

So, the question is did the Maestro, in an effort to win approval from the Boyz in the Band, leave rates at too low a note for too long?

In all fairness, we can all remember a time after the technology bubble burst, when we anticipated that real estate would be a beneficiary from the ills of equities. However, rates staying so low for so long created a powerful mix. After the Internet mania the inclination for folks to stash money in anything that didn't smack of virtual reality loomed large.

It wasn't just the collapse to historically low rates and the flight from stocks that promulgated a strange brew on Wall Street – let's call a spade a spade. The lending practices and enticements weren't as strange as they were just plain fraudulent.

And, although Greenie isn't copping to it, he was embracing the new-fangled arms on all fours. He was hopping all over the laissez-faire financial machinery as much as the recalcitrant regulators, pumping out these debt instruments of mass destruction. One might say Mr. Greenspan is up to his neck in arms.

The run on the bank in England may turn into a run on the Bank of England, and that may just be the first shot over the bow.

One brother in arms that probably doesn't appreciate Alan's marketing more green on his memoirs on the eve of one of the most important or hyped Fed meetings in years may be Ben Shalom Bernanke. I'm wondering, given his moniker, does Ben hum, "I say hello, you say good-bye"? Talk about stealing the limelight. Hey, Green is as Green does.

The market will voice its verdict today. Brother, can you spare a quarter point? Was Monday's down and dirty open just a program to pull the rubber band back in front of a long side shot after the FOMC today? Hey, he's not heavy, he's my derivative.

If the Fed fires a 50 basis point cut, will the market advance, or freeze in the headlights, wondering what the Fed knows that we don't? If the Fed cuts 50 basis points does it mean that it has been tagging the toes of more credit bodies washing ashore that we aren't aware of yet?

The larger question, of course, is exactly what will be solved regardless of what the Fed does? Is it just psychological pabulum for Goldilocks? The even larger question is will a Godzilla of Deflation arrive before The T-Rex of The Jaws of Inflation?

Exactly how much influence does the FOMC have today? My answer to a trading buddy who asked this question on Monday was, "Look to Nero and his crew."

"Did they really have fiddles in Rome?" Jethro Clampett in the Coliseum; Ben in a Box? Hey, Rome wasn't burnt in a day.

Conclusion: Technically, if the S&P remains waterlogged below 1480 after the Fed statement methinks something is wrong in Denmark. If the S&P breaks 1470 after the Fed statement, the test towards 1400 and lower should be on.

Bottom line, I expect an FOMC Cha Cha today, more worthy of Keith Richards than Arthur Murray.

So I'm wondering, "Which one of the Glimmer Twins will end up as the scapegoat?"

Editor's Note: Want more of Jeff's insight and trading ideas delivered to your inbox daily? Minyanville is proud to announce that we have launched Jeff Cooper's Daily Market Report, complete with Jeff's day trading and swing trading setups. Email Josh Sander for more details and how to sign up.
< Previous
  • 1
Next >
No positions in stocks mentioned.

The information on this website solely reflects the analysis of or opinion about the performance of securities and financial markets by the writers whose articles appear on the site. The views expressed by the writers are not necessarily the views of Minyanville Media, Inc. or members of its management. Nothing contained on the website is intended to constitute a recommendation or advice addressed to an individual investor or category of investors to purchase, sell or hold any security, or to take any action with respect to the prospective movement of the securities markets or to solicit the purchase or sale of any security. Any investment decisions must be made by the reader either individually or in consultation with his or her investment professional. Minyanville writers and staff may trade or hold positions in securities that are discussed in articles appearing on the website. Writers of articles are required to disclose whether they have a position in any stock or fund discussed in an article, but are not permitted to disclose the size or direction of the position. Nothing on this website is intended to solicit business of any kind for a writer's business or fund. Minyanville management and staff as well as contributing writers will not respond to emails or other communications requesting investment advice.

Copyright 2011 Minyanville Media, Inc. All Rights Reserved.

Featured Videos