Shiny, Shiny Patents
Sudden boom could mean new rules.
The biggest tech news of the past month didn’t involve a flying car or a hybrid scooter. Both fascinating (not to say absurd) concepts have been in the news lately, but the big headlines came courtesy of a patent entitled “Display Housing for Computing Device” recently awarded to Apple (AAPL). Not exactly the catchiest title - but that patent has already started making waves
While the basic patent hints at an iPhone-like touchscreen portable computer, referred to by bloggers as “big iPhones,” it also made reference to “a digital-video camera application” and support for “video conferencing.” That potential watershed for Apple has some wondering if the company now owns touchscreen technology entirely. In addition, it casts a spotlight on the patent industry, a virtual boomtown that could soon see increased checks and balances.
Following record years for patent filings in 2006 and 2007, last month IBM (IBM) announced that they had earned 4,186 patents in 2008. That marked the first time an American company had ever broken the 4,000-patent ceiling, exceeded the number of patents issued to Microsoft (MSFT), HP (HP), Oracle (ORCL), Apple (AAPL), and Google (GOOG) combined.
The record numbers have created a new cottage industry. One example is the growth of companies like Acacia (ACTG), which specializes in buying patents and licensing them to other companies like Verizon (VZ), Dell (DELL), and Siemens (SI) while simultaneously going after companies that may be violating those patents.
It’s symptomatic of an oversized industry, but also of an inefficient one. “There are some who would stick the moniker ‘troll’ on Acacia. They don’t invent anything. They just buy patents and enforce them,” says Mark Webbink, a visiting professor at New York Law School and Director of the Center for Patent Innovations, an organization partnering with the US Patent and Trademark Office to tighten up the way patents are issued.
Webbink adds, “It helps the economy by making the marketplace more efficient. If we have greater confidence in the patents and their validity, the better they can be enforced. Patent litigation is just exploding. Major companies like Microsoft and Cisco (CSCO) are just inundated with these lawsuits. It is semi-inefficient the way it is.”
Even if the current economic climate has seen a drop in patent filings, it's negligible compared to the decline in other markets. And with the Center for Patent Innovations looking to expand its program, there could be greater implications for the economy as a whole.
“I think it helps the economy by making the marketplace more efficient,” says Webbink. “People lose confidence in the system because some patents don’t have value, it distorts the marketplace. New innovation gets stifled for fear of being sued under a patent that has no merit whatsoever.”
With increased vigilance and the encouragement of real innovation, the exploding patent industry could someday save the US economy. If it does happen, by that time we’ll likely be reading about it on our new big iPhone.
The information on this website solely reflects the analysis of or opinion about the performance of securities and financial markets by the writers whose articles appear on the site. The views expressed by the writers are not necessarily the views of Minyanville Media, Inc. or members of its management. Nothing contained on the website is intended to constitute a recommendation or advice addressed to an individual investor or category of investors to purchase, sell or hold any security, or to take any action with respect to the prospective movement of the securities markets or to solicit the purchase or sale of any security. Any investment decisions must be made by the reader either individually or in consultation with his or her investment professional. Minyanville writers and staff may trade or hold positions in securities that are discussed in articles appearing on the website. Writers of articles are required to disclose whether they have a position in any stock or fund discussed in an article, but are not permitted to disclose the size or direction of the position. Nothing on this website is intended to solicit business of any kind for a writer's business or fund. Minyanville management and staff as well as contributing writers will not respond to emails or other communications requesting investment advice.
Copyright 2011 Minyanville Media, Inc. All Rights Reserved.