British Petroleum, Pound Get Jolly Rogering
The most massive UK retreat since Dunkirk.
Hello from New York, where I'm mighty happy to hear Steve Jobs is doing well - and so is the market. Whatever you may think of Cupertino, 1) I'm unnaturually close to my iPod and 2) The gang at Apple (AAPL) certainly has a sense for the dramatic. Congrats to Mr. Jobs on his corporate version of the Rockne-esque rally.
Still think the co-founder's health doesn't matter to Apple's stock? Let's just say it was a good quarter - but I'm not sure it'd be bucking a down-32 NASDAQ tape in a normal situation.
Here's what else I'm watching, both on and off the health front:
- McDonald's (MCD) turned in a typically McAwesome quarter this morning, giving the stock a little boost. The McDonald's story isn't one you expect 10% hops and pops from. The company is a plugger and chugger; last quarter, it did both.
One thing no longer helping US multinationals: The weakness of the US dollar. I'm long the UUP dollar ETF, both as a sort of general portfolio hedge, and because it's simply a very easy chart and story to love.
Meantime, "sound as the pound" is more dated than Mike Myers' movie career. Professor Krueger notes the British pound (FXB) is enduring the most massive UK retreat since Dunkirk. We'll see if things end better - but the Brits have some hard work in front of them.
In light of the comments coming out of the Washington testimony of former Standard & Poor's and Moody's (MCO) ratings agencies executives (such as "originators of structured securities 'typically chose the agency with the lowest standards, engendering a race to the bottom in terms of ratings quality'" and "We rate everything... Including cows"), I owe some apologies for some of my recent pieces.
Like the one in which I compared the ratings agencies to Dr. Kevorkian, or the one back on May 22nd, when I suggested that Moody's primary job was to "justify their existence." Now that I'm clear that the RAs existed to engage in a race to the bottom of the barrel of ratings quality, I feel I may have been slightly obtuse. My bad.
Also in defense of the ratings agencies' intellectual process: "Cows," the near-classic 80s song by the Suburbs. They have limited vocabularies and skinny feet - both fine attributes in barnyard animals.
While we're clarifying, a mystery emailer we'll call "Pappa Kass" wrote in after last night's show to suggest that "tTings are much worse for Las Vegas casinos than Mack Truck suggests (when I offered that selling Ford (F) to buy MGM Mirage (MGM) was a lateral trade).
a) I think both casinos and autos are debt-laden and generally headed for zero, or at least much lower.
b) As I mentioned, the Wynn (WYNN) treated me like P-Diddy. I hadn't been to Vegas in 5 years. The tables were empty, and they treated me like a superstar (great tables at top restaurants, club entries, etc.) for betting moderately (at best) on blackjack for a few hours - and this in a casino which paid an estimated $1 million for each hotel room (mine was comped).
And that's leaving the invevitable crackdown/shakedown by Macau out of the model. From where I'm sitting -- trying to remember the blackjack "book" while being mocked by a guy who recognizes me from TV -- it's very, very early to be buying casino stocks.
Today's frightening commuting question: What to do with the 10-point move in the SDS double short S&P 500 position? I tell you, if there's a downside to commuting in at 2:30 (and I'll grant you, that's a big "If"), it's that trading and commuting remain more or less mutually exclusive activities.
So you know I took a less-than-gutsy one-third of the position off. I suspect I'll be too early, rather than too late.
The information on this website solely reflects the analysis of or opinion about the performance of securities and financial markets by the writers whose articles appear on the site. The views expressed by the writers are not necessarily the views of Minyanville Media, Inc. or members of its management. Nothing contained on the website is intended to constitute a recommendation or advice addressed to an individual investor or category of investors to purchase, sell or hold any security, or to take any action with respect to the prospective movement of the securities markets or to solicit the purchase or sale of any security. Any investment decisions must be made by the reader either individually or in consultation with his or her investment professional. Minyanville writers and staff may trade or hold positions in securities that are discussed in articles appearing on the website. Writers of articles are required to disclose whether they have a position in any stock or fund discussed in an article, but are not permitted to disclose the size or direction of the position. Nothing on this website is intended to solicit business of any kind for a writer's business or fund. Minyanville management and staff as well as contributing writers will not respond to emails or other communications requesting investment advice.
Copyright 2011 Minyanville Media, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Daily Recap Newsletter