Oil, Diapers and U.S. Economy
It takes polymer (an oil byproduct) to make diapers, and it requires energy (oil) to convert plastic and paper into a Huggies diaper.
Editor's Note: This article was originally published in the Financial Times on September 22, 2006.
Are low oil prices good for the U.S. economy? Of course. But are they good for retail stocks? That depends on the retailer, and on the mental account that consumer spending is coming from.
A "mental account" is not a new form of a checking or savings account. Rather, the term comes from behavioral finance – a relatively new science that tries to explain our financial decisions. Our brain uses shortcuts to process information. And it creates "mental accounts" for different financial decisions.
We will buy a nice entertainment center with a windfall from a risky gambling excursion – it was "found" money after all. With an inheritance from a grandmother, the money goes to a more conservative type of mental account, maybe even making it into our retirement fund.
Money is a fungible commodity – $5,000 inherited from grandma buys as many Britney Spears compact discs as $5,000 won in casino gambling. But we treat this money differently, placing them into different mental accounts. We just do.
The same type of thinking applies to other aspects of life. We put a different value on money depending on the source of funds. Borrowed money usually carries less weight when it comes to spending decisions than hard-earned cash, though it should carry a higher value since we have to pay interest on it.
Almost unprecedented low interest rates created cheap money in the eyes of U.S. consumers and fueled the economy. After 9/11, they went on a prolonged shopping spree, taking out equity from their appreciating house and buying newer, bigger, shinier must-haves.
Home equity loans are considered to be "found" money and thus put in a less valuable mental account. What many neglected to notice:
- Home equity loans do not come free – they carry an interest rate often linked to short-term rates, which have risen substantially. That chips away at discretionary spending.
- Home equity loans have to be repaid.
- Housing prices rose nationwide, thus creating no wealth. Consumer debt – the liability side of the balance sheet – has risen over the years, but so has the asset side. Unless a homeowner decided to move to Antarctica or into a smaller house, the new wealth did not increase their house buying power.
I would argue that rising housing prices have not increased homeowner's wealth. Instead, they have increased property taxes – as our houses appraise at a higher value. They have increased the transaction cost of buying and selling houses (because agents take a percentage of the price).
And they have encouraged consumers to spend more as they counted on housing prices to rise forever.
This leads to another problem, as housing prices may face a first nationwide decline. The asset side of consumer balance sheets will be lower but the liability side, the debt, will remain the same or even rise as interest rates increase and negative amortization loans keep adding to mortgage balances.
How does this relate to oil prices and retailers? Very simply, our spending on gasoline comes from wages – a mental account many call a pay check. We spend our pay check mental account on staples such as groceries, clothes and diapers – lower-price items. A new kitchen countertop from Home Depot (HD) or a flat-screen television from Best Buy (BBY) comes from the home equity loan mental account. This account will shrink as housing prices decline.
Wal-Mart (WMT) and Target (TGT), which sell must-haves, should benefit as the amount in their mental account will rise with lower oil prices. Companies that sell big-ticket discretionary items will not benefit much.
Lower oil prices will most help companies that make "stuff." Take Kimberly Clark (KMB): It takes polymer (an oil byproduct) to make diapers, and it requires energy (oil) to convert plastic and paper into a Huggies diaper. Diapers do not wheel themselves into store shelves and transport costs will come down with oil prices. Kimberly Clark spent hundreds of millions of dollars becoming more efficient, but its cost cuts could not offset increased oil costs. At least for a while, lower oil prices will let the company enjoy the fruits of its labor.
The information on this website solely reflects the analysis of or opinion about the performance of securities and financial markets by the writers whose articles appear on the site. The views expressed by the writers are not necessarily the views of Minyanville Media, Inc. or members of its management. Nothing contained on the website is intended to constitute a recommendation or advice addressed to an individual investor or category of investors to purchase, sell or hold any security, or to take any action with respect to the prospective movement of the securities markets or to solicit the purchase or sale of any security. Any investment decisions must be made by the reader either individually or in consultation with his or her investment professional. Minyanville writers and staff may trade or hold positions in securities that are discussed in articles appearing on the website. Writers of articles are required to disclose whether they have a position in any stock or fund discussed in an article, but are not permitted to disclose the size or direction of the position. Nothing on this website is intended to solicit business of any kind for a writer's business or fund. Minyanville management and staff as well as contributing writers will not respond to emails or other communications requesting investment advice.
Copyright 2011 Minyanville Media, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Daily Recap Newsletter