Sorry!! The article you are trying to read is not available now.
Thank you very much;
you're only a step away from
downloading your reports.

A Closer Look at Fed Liquidity


Liquidity sets the stage for higher asset prices in the future; it does not necessarily have to do so immediately


Editor's Note: Minyanville is a community of people who share an interest in fiscal literacy. As perspective is an important aspect of our daily routine, we share this exchange with hopes that it adds balance to your process.


Ojai sounded great! I would so much rather have been there than in the faculty discussions, course preparations and article / book chapter writing.... as for next year, how about somewhere near Saratoga racetrack?!! And a little earlier in the month to catch some big races (and when I am more free??)!!

Here is my question - I've been pondering this and don't know which professor is the best to ask. Feel free to forward this to the most appropriate person(s).

If indeed the Fed is pumping more liquidity as the market reaches critical points of near breakdown
as Buzz correspondence recently suggested, what keeps those with access to the cheap dollars from spending it on trades that bet the market will go lower? Is it only the psychology leg of the table? Is it simply the number of "buy the dipsters" are large enough or well supplied enough to force a squeeze higher?

No one ever discusses this as they ponder market intervention / manipulation. The assumption seems to be that the Fed pumps and those with access to the pump buy (or attack the price of precious metals). It would be interesting to analyze the pattern of Fed redemptions with market near breakdown reversals vs. when it didn't help and the market fell and maybe was even inadvertently Fed (yikes, what a choice of words!) in the fall by the redemptions / pumping liquidity.

Maybe this is a terribly naive question, but I always encourage my students to ask such questions because they make the entire class think, myself included.

Proud to be a Minyan...

Minyan Rosalyn

MR -

Liquidity sets the stage for higher asset prices in the future; it does not necessarily have to do so immediately. But market participants that track liquidity figures and see them rise today make assumptions about the asset prices in the future and may buy assets today as a result (perception).

For example, the Fed conducted $6.5 billion in repos today; this adds liquidity to the system until those repos expire (or maintain it if rolled). There is nothing in that immediate liquidity that is used to buy stocks, but those who monitor that figure may buy today assuming that liquidity will bid asset prices higher in the future. Why?

The Fed agrees with broker / dealers to buy a t-bond out of their inventory for a certain period (repo). Consequently, the dealer (say JPM) now has extra cash on hand. JPM itself doesn't buy stocks with it, they lend it out to customers, or more accurately, it lowers the broker/call or inter-bank interest rates, which encourages customers to borrow it. Customers can certainly short securities with it, and they do sometimes, but the real effect is that excess liquidity lowers interest rates, which tend to over periods of time increase asset prices. This is inflation (excess cash) and can go to hard assets or financial ones. (Also refer to a piece I wrote on the step by step process of the multiplier effect.)

The key to immediate influence on asset prices like stocks is that market participants see the repo activity today and assume that asset prices will increase in the future, so they do not wait, they buy stocks today with available cash.

Of course that doesn't mean they will be right in the long run. Deflation is an interesting phenomenon (and a very special case) where the excess cash is hoarded (instead of spent or lent) because investors begin to raise their risk assumptions and reduce their time preferences. This is what the Fed is desperately fighting.

-Prof. Succo

< Previous
  • 1
Next >
position in JPM

The information on this website solely reflects the analysis of or opinion about the performance of securities and financial markets by the writers whose articles appear on the site. The views expressed by the writers are not necessarily the views of Minyanville Media, Inc. or members of its management. Nothing contained on the website is intended to constitute a recommendation or advice addressed to an individual investor or category of investors to purchase, sell or hold any security, or to take any action with respect to the prospective movement of the securities markets or to solicit the purchase or sale of any security. Any investment decisions must be made by the reader either individually or in consultation with his or her investment professional. Minyanville writers and staff may trade or hold positions in securities that are discussed in articles appearing on the website. Writers of articles are required to disclose whether they have a position in any stock or fund discussed in an article, but are not permitted to disclose the size or direction of the position. Nothing on this website is intended to solicit business of any kind for a writer's business or fund. Minyanville management and staff as well as contributing writers will not respond to emails or other communications requesting investment advice.

Copyright 2011 Minyanville Media, Inc. All Rights Reserved.

Featured Videos