Sorry!! The article you are trying to read is not available now.
Thank you very much;
you're only a step away from
downloading your reports.

Minyan Mailbag: Context



Editor's Note: Minyanville is a community of people who share an interest in fiscal literacy. As perspective is an important aspect of our daily routine, we share this email with hopes that it adds balance to your process.


I think that it's important to take the comment you reported about in context (or what was probably its intended context).

I am not sure which article you read that made such a comment, but perhaps the author of that comment meant something a little different.

Let me give you an anecdote as an example:

Years ago, I got a TradeStation, and I tested my own "trading systems." One thing that I quickly realized is that you have to "tell" the TradeStation EVERYTHING. Humans take for granted just how many criteria/variables are involved when making decisions. I won't go into too much detail about this because I know that you understand what I am trying to say (I subscribe to your site, so I know that you are aware of how specific your criteria must be when testing a given signal).

Anyway, perhaps the author of the statement meant to say something with the following criteria (I am purposefully being "loose" with my criteria):

1. Large move higher over the previous months.

2. Followed by a sell-off lasting for more than a few days.

3. Followed by a rally that "fails" ("fails" could be hard to define).

One other anecdote I can think of is the "How To" speeches we all had to give in grade school. I can remember a student giving a speech on how to make toast and forgetting to tell the other students to take the bread out of the toaster before buttering it (it's easy to assume that the listeners know the context of what you're trying to say).

That being said, I do expect more downside (a lot more).

Minyan Ryan


I agree that context is vitally important, and the rules you use for whatever test you're doing can drastically affect the outcome.

I didn't use any filters for the test I cited, because the manager I alluded to didn't either. It was a blanket statement that "whenever" we see such reversals, it leads to more downside. Given that generality, that's what I tested.

By the way, I also expect more downside, but relying on it because of yesterday's reversal is not one of the reasons...


< Previous
  • 1
Next >
No positions in stocks mentioned.

The information on this website solely reflects the analysis of or opinion about the performance of securities and financial markets by the writers whose articles appear on the site. The views expressed by the writers are not necessarily the views of Minyanville Media, Inc. or members of its management. Nothing contained on the website is intended to constitute a recommendation or advice addressed to an individual investor or category of investors to purchase, sell or hold any security, or to take any action with respect to the prospective movement of the securities markets or to solicit the purchase or sale of any security. Any investment decisions must be made by the reader either individually or in consultation with his or her investment professional. Minyanville writers and staff may trade or hold positions in securities that are discussed in articles appearing on the website. Writers of articles are required to disclose whether they have a position in any stock or fund discussed in an article, but are not permitted to disclose the size or direction of the position. Nothing on this website is intended to solicit business of any kind for a writer's business or fund. Minyanville management and staff as well as contributing writers will not respond to emails or other communications requesting investment advice.

Copyright 2011 Minyanville Media, Inc. All Rights Reserved.

Featured Videos