Sorry!! The article you are trying to read is not available now.
Thank you very much;
you're only a step away from
downloading your reports.

Pension Musings


Just musing here, and throwing out the following observation to see what the other contributors have to say about it. Since July 1st, the rise in the Nasdaq to today's high (up 8.7% in 6 trading days) and the rise in the other indices as well (SPX up 3.7%) has been remarkable for a number of reasons: the pace of the gains, yes, but also the aggressiveness of the buying illustrated by the large gaps on the open as well as intra-day. It is probable that programs had much to do with that aggressiveness. And perhaps the programs were of the bond-to-stock type. The market action suggests (but does not prove) as much. Add to that observation that the high beta stocks have seriously outperformed their lower beta brethren.

So here's my question: any chance that pension funding by large corporations with underfunded pensions has provided the fuel for this 6 session-wonder? And that, in an attempt to get to their assumed return target (GMs has a 9% return assumption on their pension), they are chasing some beta in the Nazz names. They know the Fed is going to do everything they can to reflate the economy, so why not take a flyer on stocks instead of bonds in the pension? Heck, we know GM just raised $17 billion for the express purpose of funding their pension plan (they need $15B over 5 years to properly fund it). There are plenty of other corporations out there in a similar predicament.

It would be an interesting, of course, if these buyers turned out to represent the last surge in the markets. Interesting, and disastrous for their pensions, if they turn out to be the last buyers. We will only know in hindsight, of course, but the possibility that the latest surge was a function of pension fund buying via programs is intriguing.
position in GM

The informatio= n on this website solely reflects the analysis of or opinion about the perf= ormance of securities and financial markets by the writers whose articles a= ppear on the site. The views expressed by the writers are not necessarily t= he views of Minyanville Media, Inc. or members of its management. Nothing c= ontained on the website is intended to constitute a recommendation or advic= e addressed to an individual investor or category of investors to purchase,= sell or hold any security, or to take any action with respect to the prosp= ective movement of the securities markets or to solicit the purchase or sal= e of any security. Any investment decisions must be made by the reader eith= er individually or in consultation with his or her investment professional.= Minyanville writers and staff may trade or hold positions in securities th= at are discussed in articles appearing on the website. Writers of articles = are required to disclose whether they have a position in any stock or fund = discussed in an article, but are not permitted to disclose the size or dire= ction of the position. Nothing on this website is intended to solicit busin= ess of any kind for a writer's business or fund. Minyanville management= and staff as well as contributing writers will not respond to emails or ot= her communications requesting investment advice.

Copyright 2011 Minyanville Media, Inc. All Rights Reserved.<= /p>

Featured Videos