Why the Chart Isn't Always Right
Technical analysis has its limits.
I even used some of the tricks from my childhood -- or at least, my younger days. As budding market mavens, one of my high-school friends and I would pore over charts together, teaming up to cover more ground and using the second pair of eyes to confirm our finds. Of course, if the other guy didn't see what you saw, you'd want to make a case.
One of the first -- and often, only -- tactics was the "squint-and-wiggle." That is, you tell the other guy to squint and then wiggle the chart in front of his face. The hope was that in the ensuing blur, the pattern would appear. Remember, this was when everything was on paper and charts were often updated each night by hand.
But even as I shook my laptop last week, I saw nothing. So I asked people to show me. Still couldn't see it. To me, head was too small and flat, and right shoulder was a mess. What I saw was a market that had been in a range between 875 and 950 sine the beginning of May. In fact, on a longer-term chart, I was seeing a large inverted head-and-shoulders, albeit the fact that the March low makes kind of a pointy head. Trust me -- if you squint and wiggle enough, you'll see it too.
Now, in no way am I disparaging technical analysis (TA). Just about all my trades start with chart-gazing. And then I use them for defining stop and exit points. That's part of the reason TA works to some extent: It shows the price levels of accumulation and distribution. But it's good to understand the limits of TA and acknowledge some of the inherent biases. The chart is always right, but often that's after the fact. What seems so obvious after the fact --like a double top or filling the gap -- might not have been so clear at the moment.
Part of the problem with this recent head-and-shoulders formation might have been that it was too obvious to too many people. Almost no trade set-up works when everyone sees the same thing.
We're visual creatures, and we like to find order in chaos. This makes pattern-recognition a very attractive method for navigating not only the markets but our daily lives. Often there's enough stability to the data or reference points to produce somewhat reliable and repeating patterns. Let's face it: Navigating by the stars worked pretty well, but that doesn't mean Orion is really wearing a belt.
Of course the market might just turn back lower and the head-and-shoulders pattern will be borne out. But I just don't see it. Maybe if I just squint and wiggle some more...
The information on this website solely reflects the analysis of or opinion about the performance of securities and financial markets by the writers whose articles appear on the site. The views expressed by the writers are not necessarily the views of Minyanville Media, Inc. or members of its management. Nothing contained on the website is intended to constitute a recommendation or advice addressed to an individual investor or category of investors to purchase, sell or hold any security, or to take any action with respect to the prospective movement of the securities markets or to solicit the purchase or sale of any security. Any investment decisions must be made by the reader either individually or in consultation with his or her investment professional. Minyanville writers and staff may trade or hold positions in securities that are discussed in articles appearing on the website. Writers of articles are required to disclose whether they have a position in any stock or fund discussed in an article, but are not permitted to disclose the size or direction of the position. Nothing on this website is intended to solicit business of any kind for a writer's business or fund. Minyanville management and staff as well as contributing writers will not respond to emails or other communications requesting investment advice.
Copyright 2011 Minyanville Media, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Daily Recap Newsletter