Sorry!! The article you are trying to read is not available now.
Thank you very much;
you're only a step away from
downloading your reports.

Tickling the VIX

By

PrintPRINT

Toddo mentioned earlier that the VIX is up today, despite the green seas in the broader market averages. This is, indeed, a relatively rare occurrence.

Since 1986, when the S&P 100 has been up between 1.0% and 1.2% (I show it being up 1.1% today), the VIX has declined on the day more than 80% of the time. Phrased another way, there's only a 20% chance of us seeing what we're seeing today as far as the VIX goes (assuming it closes where it's at now). Since 2000, it becomes even more rare, as there has been only a 13% chance of seeing the VIX up at the same time the S&P is up this amount.

So, what does it mean going forward? Unfortunately, it doesn't seem like much. Since 1986, the return 1, 3 and 5 days after such occurrences, the S&P has turned in no better or no worse performance than a random period. However, since 2000, when we see such situations as this (both the VIX and S&P being higher), the market has underperformed a random return 3 and 5 days later by a small margin. We don't have enough occasions to consider this statistically significant, but I thought you'd like to know.

Statistics can only get us so far, and just give us some background. They describe the past, and not necessarily the future - so although there does not seem to be any edge for us in the fact that the VIX is up today, it still sticks out as being unusual, and I try to always pay attention to something that's not doing what it "should." The way I look at it, at its core the VIX is a measure of supply and demand. When there is demand for OEX puts (which the VIX is based on), the VIX rises since the market makers can get away with it. And, as I alluded to yesterday, OEX traders tend to be better at market timing than equity option traders.

My take? OEX traders continue to push heavily against this market, and that will either create demand should we continue higher (as they cover their short positions) or their speculations will pay off and we will head lower over the coming weeks. Historical precedent suggests the latter is more likely than the former, but in recent weeks historical precedent hasn't meant much at all.

No positions in stocks mentioned.

The information on this website solely reflects the analysis of or opinion about the performance of securities and financial markets by the writers whose articles appear on the site. The views expressed by the writers are not necessarily the views of Minyanville Media, Inc. or members of its management. Nothing contained on the website is intended to constitute a recommendation or advice addressed to an individual investor or category of investors to purchase, sell or hold any security, or to take any action with respect to the prospective movement of the securities markets or to solicit the purchase or sale of any security. Any investment decisions must be made by the reader either individually or in consultation with his or her investment professional. Minyanville writers and staff may trade or hold positions in securities that are discussed in articles appearing on the website. Writers of articles are required to disclose whether they have a position in any stock or fund discussed in an article, but are not permitted to disclose the size or direction of the position. Nothing on this website is intended to solicit business of any kind for a writer's business or fund. Minyanville management and staff as well as contributing writers will not respond to emails or other communications requesting investment advice.

Copyright 2011 Minyanville Media, Inc. All Rights Reserved.

PrintPRINT
 
Featured Videos

WHAT'S POPULAR IN THE VILLE