Behind the Put/Call Ratio
However, if we dig a little deeper and look at the components of the ratio, the bullish spin begins to wear thin. For example, so far this morning the equity-only put/call ratio is 0.88 (this does not include index options). If it stayed this high by the close, it would be more than a standard deviation above its mean during this bear market. However, options on the QQQ tracking stock are included in this ratio, even though they are essentially an index option and not an equity option (for all intents and purposes). If we back out options traded on the QQQ, then the CBOE equity p/c ratio drops to about 0.62 -- right in the middle of its range. This is neither particularly bullish nor bearish.
As the chart below illustrates, option volume on the QQQs has skewed the put/call ratios with increasing frequency:
It has gotten to the point now where QQQ options skew the equity put/call ratio to a great extent about once every three or four days. For this reason, I prefer to monitor the equity p/c ratio without QQQ options included. When that is done, the current 10-day average is at 0.56 -- at the low end of its range, and similar to where is has been at many of the intermediate-term highs over the past two years.
Also, the OEX (S&P 100 Index) put/call ratio is running well over 1.0 today. As I'll discuss at some point soon, OEX traders are infinitely better market timers than are equity option traders, and for the most part their activity should NOT be considered in a contrarian manner. A high OEX p/c ratio tends to be bearish for the market, while a low OEX p/c ratio tends to be bullish -- especially when it is sustained over a week or two. For the past week, OEX traders have been concentrating on puts, and to an extent that has indicated trouble for the market over the last decade.
Therefore, while the headline put/call figure appears to be bullish for the market (too much pessimism), when we dig a little deeper, it appears to be neutral at best, and probably even bearish longer-term. This is only one indicator, and not nearly enough to base a trading decision off of, but I thought I would point out the danger of relying on the headline number from an oft-cited sentiment measure.
The information on this website solely reflects the analysis of or opinion about the performance of securities and financial markets by the writers whose articles appear on the site. The views expressed by the writers are not necessarily the views of Minyanville Media, Inc. or members of its management. Nothing contained on the website is intended to constitute a recommendation or advice addressed to an individual investor or category of investors to purchase, sell or hold any security, or to take any action with respect to the prospective movement of the securities markets or to solicit the purchase or sale of any security. Any investment decisions must be made by the reader either individually or in consultation with his or her investment professional. Minyanville writers and staff may trade or hold positions in securities that are discussed in articles appearing on the website. Writers of articles are required to disclose whether they have a position in any stock or fund discussed in an article, but are not permitted to disclose the size or direction of the position. Nothing on this website is intended to solicit business of any kind for a writer's business or fund. Minyanville management and staff as well as contributing writers will not respond to emails or other communications requesting investment advice.
Copyright 2011 Minyanville Media, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Daily Recap Newsletter