Derivatives and Risk
Derivatives introduce two basic risks: unknown (but quantifiable) future liability and potential leverage. The first risk means that derivatives are path-dependent: they can be worthless or worth quite a lot depending on what the underlying cash markets do and how they do it. So there can be huge amounts of open interest or contracts created in derivatives that send off alarms, but if the cash markets do nothing, neither will their derivatives. There must be a catalyst in the underlying markets, as was the case in 1998, that increases volatility to the extent that the gamma (change in the future liabilities) begins to kick in. The second risk is related: Derivatives introduce potential leverage and when leverage is increased, so is risk. Again, increased leverage is increased risk, but needs a catalyst to become a problem.
We know some facts. The notional exposure of derivatives in all markets has increased exponentially over the last ten years; some unofficial estimates are as high as $150 trillion. The largest portion of that by far is in interest-rate derivatives, which tend to be less volatile than other markets. The fastest growing area of derivatives is in credit. And the largest dealer, by far, is J.P. Morgan-Chase Bank. Another area of derivative risk is the fast growing mortgage market dominated by Fannie Mae (FNM:NYSE) and Freddie Mac (FRE:NYSE). These companies have derivative-type risk in that their future liabilities (duration) change given changes in interest rates. Freddie Mac had some bad news Monday as a reflection of the higher volatility in interest rates.
Derivatives in themselves are not a bad thing and in fact serve a very valuable economic function: breaking apart risk-return attributes. But too much of anything is bad. There is no question that derivatives have increased the potential leverage in the system. This higher leverage, all things being equal, increases volatility. Increased volatility -- although to what extent is a big question -- increases the potential for a problem, such as a failure by a major dealer, caused by derivatives. This circular causality, however, only creates the potential for a problem. It is somewhat like a speeding driver. The chances of an accident increase the faster he goes, but may be decreased by his driving abilities and other factors like the number of other cars on the road. Right now I would say the driver is going about 90 miles per hour and it is starting to drizzle.
Editors note: John Succo has written a series on derivatives which will begin running later today.
The information on this website solely reflects the analysis of or opinion about the performance of securities and financial markets by the writers whose articles appear on the site. The views expressed by the writers are not necessarily the views of Minyanville Media, Inc. or members of its management. Nothing contained on the website is intended to constitute a recommendation or advice addressed to an individual investor or category of investors to purchase, sell or hold any security, or to take any action with respect to the prospective movement of the securities markets or to solicit the purchase or sale of any security. Any investment decisions must be made by the reader either individually or in consultation with his or her investment professional. Minyanville writers and staff may trade or hold positions in securities that are discussed in articles appearing on the website. Writers of articles are required to disclose whether they have a position in any stock or fund discussed in an article, but are not permitted to disclose the size or direction of the position. Nothing on this website is intended to solicit business of any kind for a writer's business or fund. Minyanville management and staff as well as contributing writers will not respond to emails or other communications requesting investment advice.
Copyright 2011 Minyanville Media, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Daily Recap Newsletter