Sorry!! The article you are trying to read is not available now.
Thank you very much;
you're only a step away from
downloading your reports.

Shippers Kept Afloat by Shorts?


Red sky at night, sailor's delight. Red sky in morning, sailor's warning


This morning The Wall Street Journal reported that short sellers are betting against tanker stocks in an article entitled, "Shorts Expect Tankers To Take On More Water." The paper reports that
tanker rental rates have dropped 42% from a year earlier, according to Swedish ship broker P.F. Bassoe. Shares of tanker stocks have dropped as well causing the short sellers to smell blood in the water. Notable names with above average short interest include Teekay Shipping (TK), Omi Corp (OMM) and General Maritime (GMR).

We note the paper highlighted Frontline (FRO) as a stock with a high short to float basis of 6.9% and therefore a crowded short. We would counter that with a low short ratio of 2.68 and a low short intensity level 23% this is exactly the type of stock to be shorted.

Erlanger Research - FRO-Frontline Ltd ADR

In our analysis, we have found no predictive value in short to float and much greater predictability in a low short intensity, short ratio and technical rank. This makes for the perfect long squeeze.

Since late January, short intensity has risen from 29% to 48%. Indeed, short sellers have increased their bets. The last time short sellers bet against the tankers was November 2002 to July 2003. Their returns were less than stellar as OMM, TK and GMR had strong advances during that period.

Erlanger Research Marine Trans Group

In conclusion, we note one theme that we hear being echoed time and again is that "the shorts will be correct this time" whether it be the tanker stocks or another group. The market rarely lets a short seller be rewarded when the short position of a stock or group is crowded. More often than not, the stock or group only collapses after the shorts have been forced to cover the stock or group. Witness Frontline as potentially a perfect example of the long squeeze.

< Previous
  • 1
Next >
No positions in stocks mentioned.

The information on this website solely reflects the analysis of or opinion about the performance of securities and financial markets by the writers whose articles appear on the site. The views expressed by the writers are not necessarily the views of Minyanville Media, Inc. or members of its management. Nothing contained on the website is intended to constitute a recommendation or advice addressed to an individual investor or category of investors to purchase, sell or hold any security, or to take any action with respect to the prospective movement of the securities markets or to solicit the purchase or sale of any security. Any investment decisions must be made by the reader either individually or in consultation with his or her investment professional. Minyanville writers and staff may trade or hold positions in securities that are discussed in articles appearing on the website. Writers of articles are required to disclose whether they have a position in any stock or fund discussed in an article, but are not permitted to disclose the size or direction of the position. Nothing on this website is intended to solicit business of any kind for a writer's business or fund. Minyanville management and staff as well as contributing writers will not respond to emails or other communications requesting investment advice.

Copyright 2011 Minyanville Media, Inc. All Rights Reserved.

Featured Videos