The Volatility Conundrum, or When Good Companies Make Bad Stocks
By the fundamental analysis above, one would expect investors to have made a killing on this company since 1998.
To the above financials add a maverick, visionary founder/chairman, a strategy that has literally changed the value chain and operational characteristics of the industry in which they operate, and more than doubled their industry market share, becoming one of the top players in the industry by revenue.
By the fundamental analysis above, one would expect investors to have made a killing on this company since 1998: business has been strong and stable; they have managed cash, debt, receivables and inventories incredibly well; they have become a leading market share player and have succeeded in changing the operating landscape of the entire industry in which they operate; and they have delivered steady, strong gains in revenue and earnings.
But here's the rub: since June of 1998, this company's stock has gained precisely 0% and has also paid exactly no dividends. You have made nothing, despite the comfort of seeing earnings compound every year at double digit rates.
There are many lessons in the above, not least of which is that fundamentals can be (and often are) meaningless. For 40 years the academic community has been trying to figure out why the volatility of a company's stock exceeds the volatility of the company's fundamentals by, on average, a factor of 4 (and in many cases orders of magnitude). And in those 40 years not one study has been produced that explains that conundrum. Not one.
That volatility conundrum – that 'gap' between the volatility of the earnings and the stock price – is telling you something. Something important. And it is this: markets are not efficient; stocks do not follow fundamentals, and absolutely nailing revenue, earnings, debt ratios, market shares, etc. will tell you next to nothing about the stock price.
Just ask anyone who has held Dell (DELL) since June 1998. With precisely nothing to show in those 8 years, they are intimately familiar with the 'volatility conundrum.'
n on this website solely reflects the analysis of or opinion about the perf=
ormance of securities and financial markets by the writers whose articles a=
ppear on the site. The views expressed by the writers are not necessarily t=
he views of Minyanville Media, Inc. or members of its management. Nothing c=
ontained on the website is intended to constitute a recommendation or advic=
e addressed to an individual investor or category of investors to purchase,=
sell or hold any security, or to take any action with respect to the prosp=
ective movement of the securities markets or to solicit the purchase or sal=
e of any security. Any investment decisions must be made by the reader eith=
er individually or in consultation with his or her investment professional.=
Minyanville writers and staff may trade or hold positions in securities th=
at are discussed in articles appearing on the website. Writers of articles =
are required to disclose whether they have a position in any stock or fund =
discussed in an article, but are not permitted to disclose the size or dire=
ction of the position. Nothing on this website is intended to solicit busin=
ess of any kind for a writer's business or fund. Minyanville management=
and staff as well as contributing writers will not respond to emails or ot=
her communications requesting investment advice.
Copyright 2011 Minyanville Media, Inc. All Rights Reserved.<= /p>
Daily Recap Newsletter