Sorry!! The article you are trying to read is not available now.
Thank you very much;
you're only a step away from
downloading your reports.

Minyan Mailbag: Money Supply



Note: Our goal in Minyanville is to remove intimidation from the financial markets and encourage an interactive dialogue among the Minyanship. We share this next column with that very intent.


The true definition of inflation which you elaborated on recently is helpful in determining what is a symptom (higher prices) and what is the actual cause of the disease (too much money).

You also have pointed out that the Fed can (and I think you believe actually is) increase liquidity even while raising the Fed Funds rate.

Recent data shows that regardless of which measure of money you choose (M2, MZM, or M3) that the increase in the supply of money is slowing dramatically. In fact the MZM's growth for the last year of 1.1% is the lowest since 1995 and has been steeply decelerating for the last year (since the tightening began).

Is this data incongruent with your beliefs or observations?

Minyan Joe


If you look at short periods of time, the growth rate in the supply of money is not really slowing down; over longer periods it is. This is consistent with an economy hooked on credit. Let's examine what this really means.

The Federal Reserve can increase the supply of money by lowering rates so that banks can lend more money. This is the key. Banks must lend out the money. As an economy accumulates more debt, banks become more reticent to lend out marginal dollars as marginal rates drop. I have spoken about this before: the Fed can lower rates to zero, but if banks don't lend out the money the money supply will not increase. This is what I think we are seeing. If consumers have too much debt, new loans will slow despite lower rates.

The primary way I think the Fed is currently getting money into the system is by monetizing: they are buying longer term bonds with printed money in order to keep long rates stable. This has flattened the yield curve, and I think it will flatten it further. This does not show up in the money supply.

Another way the Fed strategically increases the money stock is through coupon-passes: they create dollars out of thin air and buy bonds from dealers. If the Fed did $1 billion in coupon passes with dealers, they would expect those dealers to lend out that money and through the multiplier effect anticipate a $10 billion increase in the supply of money. If the dealers do not lend that money out, the increase in the money supply will only be $1 billion. So again, in order for the Fed to significantly increase the supply of money they need cooperation from the system: banks must be willing to lend it and consumers must be willing to borrow it.

I look at the lackluster numbers you sight not as the Fed not providing liquidity, I look at it as the economy not cooperating because of an increase in risk aversion due to too much debt.

This is what Scott is showing as a bearish signal: investors and consumers decreasing their appetite for risk.

You can lead a horse to water, but you can't make him drink.

Prof. Succo

< Previous
  • 1
Next >
No positions in stocks mentioned.

The information on this website solely reflects the analysis of or opinion about the performance of securities and financial markets by the writers whose articles appear on the site. The views expressed by the writers are not necessarily the views of Minyanville Media, Inc. or members of its management. Nothing contained on the website is intended to constitute a recommendation or advice addressed to an individual investor or category of investors to purchase, sell or hold any security, or to take any action with respect to the prospective movement of the securities markets or to solicit the purchase or sale of any security. Any investment decisions must be made by the reader either individually or in consultation with his or her investment professional. Minyanville writers and staff may trade or hold positions in securities that are discussed in articles appearing on the website. Writers of articles are required to disclose whether they have a position in any stock or fund discussed in an article, but are not permitted to disclose the size or direction of the position. Nothing on this website is intended to solicit business of any kind for a writer's business or fund. Minyanville management and staff as well as contributing writers will not respond to emails or other communications requesting investment advice.

Copyright 2011 Minyanville Media, Inc. All Rights Reserved.

Featured Videos