The Next Great Bubble: China
One more bubble, please. After the bubbles in technology, housing, and commodities, we saw the mother of all bubbles: the one in global liquidity. The world economy seemed to require bubbles for its continued functioning.
I get the distinct feeling that investors’ prayers are now being answered: There's a new bubble now - or an old one is being re-inflated, depending on your perspective even as I type this. I’d like to call it the Troubled China Revival Program (TCRP).
Why start reserving bubble-naming rights? Well, I recently received an email from a friend that had the following subject line: “China … Record Loan Addition, Record Money Supply, Record Auto Sales, Record Imports of Copper, Iron Ore, and Coal, Strong Property Sales.”
I checked every figure (the hyperlinks above are mine), and every single one checked out. I couldn't quite believe what I was reading. I had thought China was in a spiraling-down recession. But even the decline in electricity consumption -- a true gauge of economic growth -- decelerated from 3.7% in January and February to a mere 0.7% in March. (Take a look at the FXI for more.)
So is China really the first nation to rebound? Is this the first sign of a rebounding global economy?
I'm sorry to say that the answer to both questions is no.
China's fortunes over the past decade remind me of Lucent Technologies in the 1990s. Lucent (now Alcatel-Lucent (ALU)) was selling equipment to dot-coms. At first, its growth was natural, the result of selling telecom equipment to traditional, cash-generating companies. Thereafter, it was only semi-natural: Dot-coms were able to buy Lucent's equipment only by raising money through private equity and equity markets, since their business models didn't factor in the necessity of cash-flow generation. Funds to buy Lucent’s equipment therefore quickly dried up, and the company's growth should have decelerated or declined. Instead, Lucent offered its own financing to dot-coms by borrowing and lending money on the cheap to finance the purchase of its own equipment. This worked well enough - until the time came to pay back the loans.
The US, of course, isn't a dot-com. But a great portion of our growth came from borrowing Chinese money to buy Chinese goods - which means that Chinese growth was dependent on that very same borrowing.
Now the US (and the rest of the world) is retrenching, corporations are slashing their spending, consumers are having moments of sickening recognition - and the consumption of Chinese goods is on the decline.
The information on this website solely reflects the analysis of or opinion about the performance of securities and financial markets by the writers whose articles appear on the site. The views expressed by the writers are not necessarily the views of Minyanville Media, Inc. or members of its management. Nothing contained on the website is intended to constitute a recommendation or advice addressed to an individual investor or category of investors to purchase, sell or hold any security, or to take any action with respect to the prospective movement of the securities markets or to solicit the purchase or sale of any security. Any investment decisions must be made by the reader either individually or in consultation with his or her investment professional. Minyanville writers and staff may trade or hold positions in securities that are discussed in articles appearing on the website. Writers of articles are required to disclose whether they have a position in any stock or fund discussed in an article, but are not permitted to disclose the size or direction of the position. Nothing on this website is intended to solicit business of any kind for a writer's business or fund. Minyanville management and staff as well as contributing writers will not respond to emails or other communications requesting investment advice.
Copyright 2009 Minyanville Media, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
1) The development of a self-sustaining middle class in China - as it relates to demand for goods & services.
2) The current amount of investment capital still flowing in to China via corporations.
It helped me in clarifying lot of my thoughts. I really liked your analogy between dotcom and Chinese growth, it reflects very well on your clear thinking.
Accept my thanks
---Radhe
The real question is for a company like that, and 75% owned by the government, by the way, for the 25% that's traded in the market, what multiple do you pay for that earning. How do you also factor in this big theoretical potential ahead?
Putting things in context, the immediate post 2nd world war US economy by the way, was also much more planned and regulated than it is today, until the Reagan Thatcher revolution, and it grew just fine for quite a while. The Japanese economy was always a lot more planned as well.
The question really is what is a good multiple for a socialist economic model, and is there circumstances (maybe today?) where you may in fact be willing to pay more for that than the US alternative?
I live in a particularly touristy area and there's been no noticeable decline in the number of Chinese tourists.
The RMB hasn't changed much in terms of it's peg to the USD so I don't see how people will be able to afford American products given that income levels haven't changed much and especially considering import tariffs (17% for electronics, for instance. Which are, ironically, actually assembled in China.)
Anyway, just thought you might want to hear how it's going here.
Still I wouldn't underestimate China. The country is the size of the US with four times the population. Would it really be that difficult to create a thriving domestic economy in a developing country this size? People don't have clothes dryers or dental floss. Is it really that tough to create domestic demand for existing lifestyle products?
I can see trading the FXI, but I have to say, I look at it as if it were FAZ/FAS: that is, I can't see passively investing in China as a long-term, buy-and-hold, proposition. Ah, but you guys know me, I just don't trust government.
Bryan,
I have spent a fair amount of time in and around Sichuan, some in Beijing and Dalian. Have you see the typical apartment for the urban Chinese? They barely have a kitchen as it is known in the West. Where in the world are they going to put a clothes dryer? Lacking central heat, Sichuan already has electricity brownouts in the winter months. I seriously doubt the government will be encouraging the use of electric clothes dryers anytime soon.
The cramped size of Chinese apartments also mitigates against the accumulation of much in the way of stuff by the urban population. Last I noticed in Chengdu, cars are a big item with those who can afford them, but there seems to be a growing problem with where to park the ever increasing numbers of the things.
The place to stimulate domestic growth would seem to be the countryside. Unfortunately, most of the population there have little in the way of buying power. Infrastructure projects will help putting some money in the pockets of the unemployed migrant workers, but what to do for an encore?
Tarjan
If you go to Best Buy in Shanghai you can see Panasonic's tumble dryer. It sells for ~900RMB (about $100). It can handle 5 kilograms of clothes. It's small and draws about as much power as a washing machine. But Panasonic hasn't done a good job marketing it. Most Chinese will come up with all kinds of reasons why they don't need a dryer -- the sun is free, their parents didn't have one, etc. But if someone were to educate the market and get GongLi to promote it and I doubt Panasonic would be able to meet the demand. Electrolux and LG would follow and off you go.
Also I don't think the government is involved in encouraging or promoting specific products. They aren't nearly as organized as most foreigners think they are... we should be thankful for that.






















