Sorry!! The article you are trying to read is not available now.
Thank you very much;
you're only a step away from
downloading your reports.

Open Wide . . .

By

Who stole my lipstick!?!

PrintPRINT

And so it goes. Transact Technologies (TACT), to which I gave the benefit of the doubt as it was sliding toward the chart's precipice, kicked the quarter seven-ways-to-Sunday, and it's getting taken apart. Not even Daisy can find enough lipstick for the Q4 results: everything was much lower than I had envisioned, and the guidance for '05 did not give me the warm and fuzzies either, especially since it is based on the dreaded "backload".

The CEO did not hide that the casino business hit the wall in December, did not recover in January, and any pick-up in February and March won't make up for the difference. He did not deny having been very optimistic on the prior quarterly call.

I mention this because I am trying to decide how credible it is that the second half of the year will be strong enough to carry the lowered estimates. The Int'l Game Techn. (IGT) business; the Wynn Resorts (WYNN) deal; some bank POS projects (as in Point-Of-Sale, not the other acronym for those as happy as I am); Europe's biz (most likely tied to the closing of the Caesars Ent. (CZR) buy-out by Harrah's (HET); and a number of other opportunities are all supposed to ramp in the 2nd half of the year; that was the timing even before last night's debacle; in other words, these are not push-outs. Will they materialize?

The $13 prints on the stock (as I write this Thursday evening), IMHO are not an overraction. Ex net cash of about $1/sh - the company does expect to be free cash flow positive every quarter this year - TACT now trades at 20x '05 lowered guidance, on 20% Y/Y expected growth. The old fashioned 1 PEG valuation. If I looked at TACT tomorrow for the first time, I'd probably think it is a fairly valued stock, with nice growth prospects, relatively little competition in the casino business, but with a chart that shows a whole lot of seriously unahppy shareholders.

"Morning After" additional thoughts: things are even harsher right now than last night. With Mandalay reporting pretty lousy numbers, and the insiders selling in several casino names noted earlier by Collins, I am leaning toward believing that TACT got blindsided by its customers, as opposed to having internal issues.

Position in TACT
The information on this website solely reflects the analysis of or opinion about the performance of securities and financial markets by the writers whose articles appear on the site. The views expressed by the writers are not necessarily the views of Minyanville Media, Inc. or members of its management. Nothing contained on the website is intended to constitute a recommendation or advice addressed to an individual investor or category of investors to purchase, sell or hold any security, or to take any action with respect to the prospective movement of the securities markets or to solicit the purchase or sale of any security. Any investment decisions must be made by the reader either individually or in consultation with his or her investment professional. Minyanville writers and staff may trade or hold positions in securities that are discussed in articles appearing on the website. Writers of articles are required to disclose whether they have a position in any stock or fund discussed in an article, but are not permitted to disclose the size or direction of the position. Nothing on this website is intended to solicit business of any kind for a writer's business or fund. Minyanville management and staff as well as contributing writers will not respond to emails or other communications requesting investment advice.

Copyright 2011 Minyanville Media, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
PrintPRINT
 
Featured Videos

WHAT'S POPULAR IN THE VILLE