Fed-Ex: The Good, The Bad and The Ugly
While FDX's margins were disappointing, the company is showing pricing power and did keep its full-year estimates intact.
It was a slightly strange quarter as Fed-Ex (FDX) both missed and beat consensus estimates, depending on how you want to look at it.
Ex-costs associated with a new pilot's contract, FDX reported $1.89 vs. consensus estimates of $1.76. However, subtracting out the $.25 charge, the company missed. Beyond that, there were some pretty high expectations built into the stock, on which it mostly disappointed.
- FDX beat on the revenue line.
- The company continues to take market share from UPS (UPS) and says it is starting to show pricing power.
- Effective January 1, the company will be raising prices on air and ground shipments, by 3.5% and 4.9%, respectively.
- Operating expenses were in line on lower fuel costs.
- Year on year showed an earnings and operating income increase.
- Mitigating Factor: This was lower than what the Street was looking for.
- FDX tightened the lower end of its guidance range.
- FDX missed EPS estimates, unless you accept its excuse of a new labor contract with the pilots.
- This is acceptable given that estimates were excluding it.
- Operating margin came in lower than was hoped for at 9.3 versus expectations of 10.3.
- Operating income growth rate was 6% versus a hoped for 16.5%.
- Revenue per package growth and average daily package volume growth were below expectations.
- The company guided below its third quarter consensus estimates ($1.20-$1.35 vs Street at $1.53).
- Kinko's continues to perform worse than expectations.
The stock is down more than $4 on the news and I don't think I would cover my firm's short, especially given the run-up in share price over the past several months (it looks like people had extremely high expectations).
I would, however, not sell more into this news and down a couple of bucks more, I would look to lighten up my firm's volume position. While FDX's margins were disappointing, the company is showing pricing power and did keep its full-year estimates intact. Also, it is not trading at particularly rich valuations compared to historic levels. Finally, I anticipate that the Street analysts will not be concerned by the headline miss, as most analysts factored in the pilots' contract.
Editor's Note: Steve Zausner of Vicis Capital also contributed to this article.
The information on this website solely reflects the analysis of or opinion about the performance of securities and financial markets by the writers whose articles appear on the site. The views expressed by the writers are not necessarily the views of Minyanville Media, Inc. or members of its management. Nothing contained on the website is intended to constitute a recommendation or advice addressed to an individual investor or category of investors to purchase, sell or hold any security, or to take any action with respect to the prospective movement of the securities markets or to solicit the purchase or sale of any security. Any investment decisions must be made by the reader either individually or in consultation with his or her investment professional. Minyanville writers and staff may trade or hold positions in securities that are discussed in articles appearing on the website. Writers of articles are required to disclose whether they have a position in any stock or fund discussed in an article, but are not permitted to disclose the size or direction of the position. Nothing on this website is intended to solicit business of any kind for a writer's business or fund. Minyanville management and staff as well as contributing writers will not respond to emails or other communications requesting investment advice.
Copyright 2011 Minyanville Media, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Daily Recap Newsletter