The Bush Trade
"With a strong sense of history, George W. Bush last week made the case for "a forward strategy" of idealism in American foreign policy. He dared to place his Big Idea - what has become the central theme and purpose of his presidency - in the direct line of aspirations expressed by three of the past century's most far-seeing and controversial U.S. presidents.
He evoked Woodrow Wilson trying to make the world safe for democracy in 1918; then F.D.R. in 1941 giving hope of freedom to peoples enslaved by Nazism; finally, Ronald Reagan telling a skeptical Britain's Parliament in 1982 that a historic turning point had been reached and Communist tyranny could not stop the march of freedom. "From the Fourteen Points to the Four Freedoms, to the Speech at Westminster, America has put our power at the service of principle," Bush said. "The advance of freedom is the calling of our time."
-William Safire, The New York Times 11/10/03-
"Borrowing, whether by the federal government or individual consumers, has become the preferred (perhaps only) way to make ends meet. What's been driving this so-called red-hot economy is not the solid growth in jobs and wages that is essential for a flourishing middle class, but an orgy of refinancing and an irresponsible mixture of tax cuts and federal spending that is creating monster deficits. In short, we're mortgaging the nation's future.
On Friday the Federal Reserve reported that consumers had jacked up their borrowing in September by the largest amount since the beginning of the year. The $15.1 billion increase in consumer borrowing was 9.7 percent higher than in August, and pushed total consumer debt to $1.97 trillion. "
-Bob Herbert, The New York Times 11/10/03-
I normally do not digress from market commentary, and here although I walk a thin line, I believe this has significant implications for the markets. We all have a say in how our country is run. I am for individual freedom, everyone is. The argument is how to get there.
Any trade (decision) must weigh the reward for the risk (potential cost). I found it interesting that on the same page today in the New York Times one editorialist spoke of reward and the other of risk.
When we take a quick glance at our current situation, it seems we have the best of all worlds: an economy that is picking up and the workings of the greatest power on earth to free the oppressed. When we take a step back and really look at this trade objectively, how many of you would truly take the risk?
The information on this website solely reflects the analysis of or opinion about the performance of securities and financial markets by the writers whose articles appear on the site. The views expressed by the writers are not necessarily the views of Minyanville Media, Inc. or members of its management. Nothing contained on the website is intended to constitute a recommendation or advice addressed to an individual investor or category of investors to purchase, sell or hold any security, or to take any action with respect to the prospective movement of the securities markets or to solicit the purchase or sale of any security. Any investment decisions must be made by the reader either individually or in consultation with his or her investment professional. Minyanville writers and staff may trade or hold positions in securities that are discussed in articles appearing on the website. Writers of articles are required to disclose whether they have a position in any stock or fund discussed in an article, but are not permitted to disclose the size or direction of the position. Nothing on this website is intended to solicit business of any kind for a writer's business or fund. Minyanville management and staff as well as contributing writers will not respond to emails or other communications requesting investment advice.
Copyright 2011 Minyanville Media, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Daily Recap Newsletter