Minyan Mailbag - Part Deux
One of the most amazing characteristics of the last 2 years on a global basis has been the remarkably tight correlation among and between U.S. markets and those equity markets of the rest of the world. Look at equity markets in Japan, Hong Kong, Australia, Switzerland, Holland, Spain, Italy, Germany, France, the UK, Brazil, Mexico, Singapore, and Thailand: each made important lows in late 2002 or early 2003 and has subsequently had a very nice run off those lows. This is the direct result of the global reflation trade engineered by the major central banks across the world. Such a high correlation has never been seen before save for a period roughly in 1925-1935. And what it means for investors trying to diversify away from USD-denominated assets is troubling.
Specifically, if the economic cycles of the world's economies are tightly correlated thanks to this coordinated credit reflation, then the analysis of which asset market to diversify into becomes a matter of determining which other fiat currency is going to go down less than the USD. This is precisely what John pointed out and is a key point to appreciate in the credit-driven, debt-laden, fiat-currency economies that are your options for diversification.
Simply buying an ETF in another country's stock market then won't necessarily insulate you from the decline you would expect to see if you are bearish the USD and bearish U.S. stocks. Other countries' stock markets can go down as much or more than the US markets' indices, irrespective of what's going on with its relative currency value vs the USD. Don't forget, the U.S. accounted for something like 96% of global GDP growth from 1996-2002, making us (and our credit-driven consumer demand) the number one market for the rest of the world.
So if you are USD bearish and U.S. stocks bearish, then you are inferring that the world's primary growth engine (U.S. consumers) is going to be taken away from the rest of the world. In such an environment, if we sneeze, they catch the flu, or worse. And that would be potentially very bad for their stock markets.
Which reinforces John's point about real assets like gold. Holding an ETF in a Japanese, Thai, Mexican, Australian, or German stock index is nothing more than investing in a wholly owned subsidiary of the U.S. economy. That ain't diversification. Gold is.
n on this website solely reflects the analysis of or opinion about the perf=
ormance of securities and financial markets by the writers whose articles a=
ppear on the site. The views expressed by the writers are not necessarily t=
he views of Minyanville Media, Inc. or members of its management. Nothing c=
ontained on the website is intended to constitute a recommendation or advic=
e addressed to an individual investor or category of investors to purchase,=
sell or hold any security, or to take any action with respect to the prosp=
ective movement of the securities markets or to solicit the purchase or sal=
e of any security. Any investment decisions must be made by the reader eith=
er individually or in consultation with his or her investment professional.=
Minyanville writers and staff may trade or hold positions in securities th=
at are discussed in articles appearing on the website. Writers of articles =
are required to disclose whether they have a position in any stock or fund =
discussed in an article, but are not permitted to disclose the size or dire=
ction of the position. Nothing on this website is intended to solicit busin=
ess of any kind for a writer's business or fund. Minyanville management=
and staff as well as contributing writers will not respond to emails or ot=
her communications requesting investment advice.
Copyright 2011 Minyanville Media, Inc. All Rights Reserved.<= /p>
Daily Recap Newsletter