Sorry!! The article you are trying to read is not available now.
Thank you very much;
you're only a step away from
downloading your reports.

Want to Talk About Moochers Vs. Makers? 10 Welfare-Case Companies Revisited


Lost in the current debate about who is accepting hand-outs and expecting tax-breaks is one monster of a costly habit both Democratic and Republican politicians have supported.

MINYANVILLE ORIGINAL Mitt Romney's attempt to out Obama as a believer in redistribution has fallen flat. As Ezra Klein reported in yesterday's Wonkbook entry:

Mitt Romney, like pretty much every other American politician, believes in redistribution. Specifically, the "issues" section of his website says he believes in a progressive tax code, the Medicare program, the Medicaid program, the food stamp program, the Social Security program, and pretty much every other feature of the federal government that's involved in redistributing income."

As a fringe benefit to the uproar caused by both the 47% viral video and Romney's counterattack attempt to label Obama as anti-capitalist, however, the public has learned more about exactly what redistribution means and how the US tax policy works.

Several journalists and experts have rushed in to explain the many reasons why a large portion of the population is not obligated to pay taxes. About half the members of the group Romney referred to in his speech do not pay taxes because they do not meet the taxable income threshold; simply put, they don't earn enough to be taxed. Others are either the elderly or families receiving refundable tax credits as an income supplement or to help support young children. It's hard to call these people "takers."

On the other hand, the 53% who do pay taxes, we're now learning, also benefit from the greatest number of tax breaks.

Meanwhile, less discussed in these feverish debates is another form of welfare that free market believers call the dirtiest and that Democratic voters often find misguided: Corporate welfare. The CATO Institute, a Libertarian think tank, says it costs the US $100 billion per year.

In his convention speech earlier this month, President Obama made an ambitious proclamation, saying: "I will not let oil companies write this country's energy plan, or endanger our coastlines, or collect another $4 billion in corporate welfare from our taxpayers."
< Previous
No positions in stocks mentioned.

The information on this website solely reflects the analysis of or opinion about the performance of securities and financial markets by the writers whose articles appear on the site. The views expressed by the writers are not necessarily the views of Minyanville Media, Inc. or members of its management. Nothing contained on the website is intended to constitute a recommendation or advice addressed to an individual investor or category of investors to purchase, sell or hold any security, or to take any action with respect to the prospective movement of the securities markets or to solicit the purchase or sale of any security. Any investment decisions must be made by the reader either individually or in consultation with his or her investment professional. Minyanville writers and staff may trade or hold positions in securities that are discussed in articles appearing on the website. Writers of articles are required to disclose whether they have a position in any stock or fund discussed in an article, but are not permitted to disclose the size or direction of the position. Nothing on this website is intended to solicit business of any kind for a writer's business or fund. Minyanville management and staff as well as contributing writers will not respond to emails or other communications requesting investment advice.

Copyright 2011 Minyanville Media, Inc. All Rights Reserved.

Featured Videos