Sorry!! The article you are trying to read is not available now.
Thank you very much;
you're only a step away from
downloading your reports.

News of The Death of American Economic Power Is Exaggerated!

By

The "cleanest dirty shirt" argument may be an incorrect interpretation.

PrintPRINT
The obituary of the American century has been written, but the USA will continue to play a dominant role in the 21st century.

America has emerged as the "cleanest of the dirty shirts" of the developed economies.

Economic Resilience

The US economy remains by some distance the world's largest. Despite rising inequality, Americans remain relatively wealthy.

While the global financial crisis has damaged America's economic power, its position remains superior to many other countries. The US was among the first nations to be affected. Financial market traders believe that: "if you are going to panic, panic first". America benefited from first mover advantages during the crisis.

American policymakers, unlike their counterparts, moved aggressively to recapitalise financial institutions to reduce the risk of contagion. Large government budget deficits and specific industry programs (for the motor car industry) helped prop up demand, reducing the effects of the financial problems on the real economy.

The US economy is now growing, albeit modestly.

On a comparative basis, even America's debt statistics are better. Total debt (government, corporate and household) has fallen to about 330% of GDP from its peak of 359% in 2008.

Government net debt at around 84% of GDP is higher than Germany (58%) but well below that of weaker European nations.

Household gross debt (86% of GDP) is higher than many countries. but US household net debt (gross household net debt adjusted for financial assets and liabilities) is negative 235% of GDP, that is financial assets are greater than liabilities. This is better than most nations and only less than Japan amongst developed countries.

Corporate net debt (83% of GDP) is in the middle of the range of comparable economies.

Financial institution debt (88% of GDP) is lower than all developed countries except Canada. Banks have decreased leverage, having been forced to aggressively deleverage by selling off assets and raising capital. Banks also have only modest exposure to sovereign debt (8% of GDP) compared to banks in Europe (13-35%) or Japan (83%).

America is also less vulnerable to external shocks than comparable economies. US gross external liabilities (161% of GDP) are lower than most developed countries. US net external liabilities (amount owed to foreigners adjusted for a country's international investment position) are a manageable 26% of GDP.

The US is less reliant on the world while America's economy is focused on its substantial domestic market. The US remains a major food producer with agriculture being a major industry. It is a net exporter of food, controlling almost half of world grain exports.

Historically dependent on oil imports, which constitute a substantial part of its $600 billion trade deficit, the US is seeking to cut imports and increase its energy independence through increased production of shale gas and oil.

US oil output has risen 25% and is forecast to increase an additional 30%, to 11.1 million barrels per day by 2020. In combination with energy conservation measures, increased production has reduced US petroleum imports to around 40% of total consumption from 60% in 2005. American shale gas production has increased over 35% of total natural gas production from 2% in 2012.

While US energy independence is not likely in the near term, increase in domestic energy production and reduction in imports provides America with a significant competitive advantage and reduces its reliance on foreign suppliers.

American dominance of key industries makes it an indispensable monopolist, ensuring demand for many of its products. In technology and software, pharmaceuticals, complex manufactured products (aerospace, defense hardware, heavy machinery), entertainment and services, the difficulty in finding substitute suppliers or high switching costs limits potential loss of markets for American products.

A weaker dollar and lower energy costs, which reduces the cost base of domestic production, has encouraged a shift of production, manufacturing and assembly work back into the US. Additionally re-shoring is taking place, that is the relocation of offshore production back to America.

This should assist in creating the jobs needed to reduce unemployment. Stronger growth and lower unemployment will assist in reducing the large US budget deficit and addressing its public finances.

The Beauty of America's (Economic) Weapons

American economic resilience is also based on its superior financial armaments.

The US central bank's ability to use quantitative easing ("QE")) to monetize its debt gives it flexibility to deal with its problems. Japan, UK and Switzerland and Japan, although not the Euro-Zone, have similar options. But the US dollar's share of world trade and investment is extraordinary and out of proportion to its economic role, giving American policy makers greater options.

The dollar remains the principal currency for invoicing and settling trade. Around 85% of foreign exchange transactions involve the dollar. 50% of stock of international securities is denominated in US dollars. Central banks hold 50-60% of their foreign exchange reserves in dollars. This is despite the fact that the US's share of global exports is only 13% and foreign direct investment is 20%. Before the crisis, at one stage, around 85% of global capital flows were into the US, including a significant portion (around $400 billion per year) into US government bonds.

Central to the US economic strategy has been zero interest rates and (to date) three rounds of QE. While its efficacy in boosting real economic activity is debatable, QE has helped finance the US budget deficit. The US Federal Reserve currently purchases around 60-70% of all US government bonds. It does this by directly buying bonds or indirectly by injecting reserves into the banking system, which is then invested in Treasuries.

Low interest rates and QE have also helped reduce the value of the US dollar. Despite bouts of dollar buying on its safe haven status, the US dollar has weakened.

The weaker dollar enhances America's competitive position. The devaluation is a de facto cut in costs, helping to drive export and economic growth.

The weaker US dollar improves America's external position. US foreign investments and overseas income gain in value.

The major benefit relates to debt owned by foreigners. Foreigner investors, China, Japan and "others", principally oil exporting nations, Asian central banks or sovereign wealth funds, hold about 35% to 40% of America's US$16 trillion in government debt. As almost of US government debt is denominated in dollars, devaluation reduces the value of its outstanding debt, making it easier for the US to service its debt.

A weakening dollar should logically discourage further foreign investment in US debt. But the position of the US dollar as the pre-dominant reserve currency has a perverse effect, ensuring the ability of America to find investors in US treasury securities.

The relative credit quality of the US, the unparalleled size and liquidity of its government bond market ensures investor support. Given its reserve currency and safe haven status, US dollars and government bonds remains a cornerstone of investment portfolios of foreign lenders, especially central banks with large foreign exchange reserves.

Investors must keep buying dollars and reinvesting in dollar denominated US government bonds to avoid realizing currency losses on their existing investments. Foreign central banks must also purchase dollars to avoid even more rapid appreciation of their own currencies. In effect, devaluation forces existing investors to double down to lower their average cost of US dollars and US government debt.

America's financial strategy entails lowering the value of its currency and decreasing the wealth of foreign investors to improve its competitive position.

Foreign investors, including China and Japan, which have around US$2 trillion invested in US government bonds, face a significant loss of their national savings. Between 2008 and 2012, the depreciation in the US dollar resulted in a loss of over US$600 billion for foreign creditors.

America risks financial retaliation. Other countries may undertake their own QE programs or take other steps to offset American actions. With US policy makers contemplating a phased reduction in monetary accommodation, a high US dollar may undermine the strategy.

At the moment, the US is gambling that its economic recovery is sufficiently self-sustaining to withstand these pressures. In any case, interest rates remain low and fiscal policy loose. Policy makers also have the option of slowing the reduction in QE programs.

More fundamentally, the US has the economic size and scale to retreat into near autarky, that is, a closed economy with limited international trade or capital flows. It can survive and retool its economy behind explicit or implicit trade barriers. A shift to a more closed economy fits America's natural isolationism, focused on aggressively protecting the nation's economic self-interest whilst expanding US power and influence.

In the 1930s, Great Britain did something similar under Imperial Preference, a system of reciprocal tariffs or free trade agreements between the dominions and colonies of Britain. It was used to protect Great Britain's position as a global power against competition from the US and Germany.

In an advertisement for Chrysler cars shown during the US Super Bowl in 2011 to the largest television audience in US history, an aging Clint Eastwood gruffly states: "it's half time, America. And our second half is about to begin". The game certainly isn't over!
< Previous
  • 1
Next >
No positions in stocks mentioned.

The information on this website solely reflects the analysis of or opinion about the performance of securities and financial markets by the writers whose articles appear on the site. The views expressed by the writers are not necessarily the views of Minyanville Media, Inc. or members of its management. Nothing contained on the website is intended to constitute a recommendation or advice addressed to an individual investor or category of investors to purchase, sell or hold any security, or to take any action with respect to the prospective movement of the securities markets or to solicit the purchase or sale of any security. Any investment decisions must be made by the reader either individually or in consultation with his or her investment professional. Minyanville writers and staff may trade or hold positions in securities that are discussed in articles appearing on the website. Writers of articles are required to disclose whether they have a position in any stock or fund discussed in an article, but are not permitted to disclose the size or direction of the position. Nothing on this website is intended to solicit business of any kind for a writer's business or fund. Minyanville management and staff as well as contributing writers will not respond to emails or other communications requesting investment advice.

Copyright 2011 Minyanville Media, Inc. All Rights Reserved.

PrintPRINT
 
Featured Videos

WHAT'S POPULAR IN THE VILLE