With Strong Month, Durable Goods Orders Rose 4% Over May 2011
The trend of real durable goods orders tends to correlate well with stock prices with varying lead and lag times. The current trend of this index implies continued rangebound trading in stocks.
With SA data, this may not be the case since SA data can overstate or understate the real underlying change by attempting to fit a standardized curve. There are no such issues when using the actual data.
Overall new orders volume remains well below the 2004 through 2007 levels, and the uptrend has slowed from the dramatic rebound of 2009-2010. However, 4% growth isn't bad.
May is usually an up month. This May was up by 5% from the April level (month-over-month, April to May 2012). That compares with a gain of 4.8% in May 2011 (April to May 2011). The average May change over the previous 10 years was a gain of 2.6%, so this year was not only better than last year, it was also significantly better than average. This year's gain was the strongest since 2006, which had a 5.3% increase.
On a three month basis, May is usually stronger than February. The average gain for May versus February over the previous 10 years was 4%. Last year, the gain was 7.4%. However, this year the May level was down 3.2% versus February. Is that a problem? On the chart, the trend looks stable, and so are the year-to-year gains -- so for now, it looks like just noise within a normal range.
The headline number was a 1.1% gain month to month SA. That beat the economists' consensus of 0.5%. As usual, they were looking at the wrong data. The real time withholding tax data showed the economy gaining ground. Economists were mostly convinced that it was slowing.
What does this mean for stocks? The trend of real durable goods orders tends to correlate well with stock prices with varying lead and lag times. The current trend of this index implies continued rangebound trading in stocks with, at best, a slight uptrend, unless and until the annual rate of change goes negative.
Editor's Note: Lee Adler is a financial markets analyst based in Florida. This article originally appeared on his website, The Wall Street Examiner.
The information on this website solely reflects the analysis of or opinion about the performance of securities and financial markets by the writers whose articles appear on the site. The views expressed by the writers are not necessarily the views of Minyanville Media, Inc. or members of its management. Nothing contained on the website is intended to constitute a recommendation or advice addressed to an individual investor or category of investors to purchase, sell or hold any security, or to take any action with respect to the prospective movement of the securities markets or to solicit the purchase or sale of any security. Any investment decisions must be made by the reader either individually or in consultation with his or her investment professional. Minyanville writers and staff may trade or hold positions in securities that are discussed in articles appearing on the website. Writers of articles are required to disclose whether they have a position in any stock or fund discussed in an article, but are not permitted to disclose the size or direction of the position. Nothing on this website is intended to solicit business of any kind for a writer's business or fund. Minyanville management and staff as well as contributing writers will not respond to emails or other communications requesting investment advice.
Copyright 2011 Minyanville Media, Inc. All Rights Reserved.