Sorry!! The article you are trying to read is not available now.
Thank you very much;
you're only a step away from
downloading your reports.

9 Out of 10 Sleep-Deprived Octogenarians Prefer Base Jumping Over Cliff Diving. Who Knew?

By

On the surface, base jumping appears to be a better move than cliff diving. But is it really?

PrintPRINT
So, Congress decided it preferred base jumping over cliff diving! You may not have heard of base jumping, but this is where an extreme athlete jumps off a cliff (or mountain or office building), free falls for a few seconds, and then deploys a parachute. The jumper then lands on solid ground at the base of the cliff.

Like base jumping, cliff diving is also for extreme athletes. But cliff diving is not the same as base jumping. Cliff diving occurs on cliffs that overlook water. Usually the water is rocky and dangerous to land in. Often, you need to monitor the waves to time your jump. And, there is no parachute involved.

Congress picked base jumping yesterday, deploying its parachute to slow our country's descent and make the austerity we face a little less daunting. That's what it did with the legislation it passed yesterday. On its surface, it seems like base jumping is a better alternative to cliff diving. It seems safer to have a parachute, right?

But it seems like Congress decided to base jump off a cliff that overlooks the water. In other words, the base jumper and his parachute are going to land in the water. For a base jumper, this is not necessarily a safe place to land. A water-soaked parachute can drag you right to the bottom. Plus, the water could be dangerous and the rocks around the cliff still don't look friendly. The uncertainty of getting out of the water without getting hurt seems high.

OK, I have dragged out this analogy far enough. Let's analyze what is really happening here. The market is rallying because Congress elected to soften the impacts of the fiscal cliff. The austerity of tax hikes for all and deep spending cuts was viewed by everyone as just too much for our fragile economy to handle. Delaying the cuts for two months and softening the tax blow for 98% of the tax base is viewed, for now, as a reasonable compromise by the markets.

But is the rally really justified? Let's remind ourselves of a few things. First, this legislation doesn't change anything about our economy. It just makes it so that deep austerity won't immediately kick us into a recession. The economy is still fragile.

Second, this market rally today just gets us back to the same level the S&P 500 (INDEXSP:.INX) sat at on Sept. 30, 2012. That's right. We are flat for the last three months.

Third, the earnings season that kicked off in October 2012 was weak, and forward guidance was weak. We are entering the new earnings season in the next few weeks and it is one of the most important seasons we will experience in quite a while. If earnings are weak to average yet again, it will just confirm for everyone that our economy (and the global economy) is still fragile – at best!

I think this market rally has to subside a little bit. It is hard to believe that the market rally can have legs ahead of an earnings season that holds very little promise of outperformance. To drive this market up now would be a bet on the earnings coming through to justify this valuation. I am not a believer that the market will get ahead of itself this close to earnings season. It might as well move sideways and wait out the earnings season before deciding how to move – up or down.

And let's not forget that Congress just affirmed legislation that implements austerity. Austerity is not for countries that feel great about their forward economic outlook, but rather it's for countries that lack visibility and certainty about their ability to grow their total economic pie. When the market starts to realize that austerity is a mixed blessing and earnings affirm a weak recovery, the market will likely become a very range-bound entity.

One thing is for sure: Ultimately, this will need to be a very watched earnings season to get a read on our economy's output.
< Previous
  • 1
Next >
No positions in stocks mentioned.
The information on this website solely reflects the analysis of or opinion about the performance of securities and financial markets by the writers whose articles appear on the site. The views expressed by the writers are not necessarily the views of Minyanville Media, Inc. or members of its management. Nothing contained on the website is intended to constitute a recommendation or advice addressed to an individual investor or category of investors to purchase, sell or hold any security, or to take any action with respect to the prospective movement of the securities markets or to solicit the purchase or sale of any security. Any investment decisions must be made by the reader either individually or in consultation with his or her investment professional. Minyanville writers and staff may trade or hold positions in securities that are discussed in articles appearing on the website. Writers of articles are required to disclose whether they have a position in any stock or fund discussed in an article, but are not permitted to disclose the size or direction of the position. Nothing on this website is intended to solicit business of any kind for a writer's business or fund. Minyanville management and staff as well as contributing writers will not respond to emails or other communications requesting investment advice.

Copyright 2011 Minyanville Media, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
PrintPRINT

Busy? Subscribe to our free newsletter!

Submit
 

WHAT'S POPULAR IN THE VILLE