Mortgage Market Cure Will Be Worse Than the Disease
The more money thrown at housing, the more existing homeowners will benefit relative to prospective buyers -- and the further the market will be distorted.
Even though the Case-Shiller data reported last week were strong, they were for March and therefore are a backward-looking response to the artificially low mortgage rates created by QE3 in September 2012 and exacerbated by QE4 in December. Forward-looking indicators such as the relative performance of homebuilders or the movement of lumber futures are pointing lower for the housing industry. September lumber futures have declined 29.4% since mid March; over the same period the S&P 1500 Homebuilders Index, stomping-ground of PulteGroup (NYSE:PHM), Lennar (NYSE:LEN) and D.R. Horton (NYSE:DHI), has underperformed the Supercomposite itself, 1.51% to 5.83%.
In the eternal struggle between looking backward and looking forward, put me down in the forward-looking camp, please.
Every market bully learns quickly and the hard way that they can push a market higher or lower for a short period of time, but they cannot keep it there, even armed with a printing press; all you need to do is pull up a chart of 10-year Japanese government bond yields over the past month. The mortgage market has encountered much the same thing; yields on FNMA 30-year current coupon mortgages fell to preposterously low levels last September and have rebounded since then. Their option-adjusted spread is back to year-ago levels.
Affordability and Rewards
As home affordability has three components -- buyers' cash flow available to housing, the financing costs, and capital price of the home -- both higher home prices and higher mortgage costs are negatives for prospective buyers. Oddly, higher home prices are treated as unalloyed good news whereas they are good news only for those on the sell-side of the equation. That's life, though; I never get a call from a reporter asking me why the stock market rose so much or why gasoline prices are declining. We do have our mental roster of who wears the white hats and who wears the black hats.
As no one wants to see home prices fall or mortgage rates rise, the political impulse will be to engage in further subsidization of the housing sector. As has been the case in the health care and education industries, both of which have seen oodles of preferential financing, the suppliers will reap the economic rent of those subsidies; there is a reason why health care and education expenses always seem to rise faster than anything else.
The more money thrown at housing, the more existing homeowners will benefit relative to prospective buyers, and the further the market will be distorted. If misallocation of resources had feathers, it could be our national bird.
The only way out of this emerging problem will be for disposable personal income to rise even faster than home prices. Yes, that would be nice. It is also unlikely as real disposable income has been struggling to grow over the past quarter-century and will continue to struggle until we hit the next productivity boom for as-yet unknown reasons.
The information on this website solely reflects the analysis of or opinion about the performance of securities and financial markets by the writers whose articles appear on the site. The views expressed by the writers are not necessarily the views of Minyanville Media, Inc. or members of its management. Nothing contained on the website is intended to constitute a recommendation or advice addressed to an individual investor or category of investors to purchase, sell or hold any security, or to take any action with respect to the prospective movement of the securities markets or to solicit the purchase or sale of any security. Any investment decisions must be made by the reader either individually or in consultation with his or her investment professional. Minyanville writers and staff may trade or hold positions in securities that are discussed in articles appearing on the website. Writers of articles are required to disclose whether they have a position in any stock or fund discussed in an article, but are not permitted to disclose the size or direction of the position. Nothing on this website is intended to solicit business of any kind for a writer's business or fund. Minyanville management and staff as well as contributing writers will not respond to emails or other communications requesting investment advice.
Copyright 2011 Minyanville Media, Inc. All Rights Reserved.