Buzz on the Street: Responding to the Syrian Crisis, the Market Remains Volatile
A look back at the happenings on Wall Street this week, as seen by Minyanville's Buzz & Banter.
Everyone Is Staring at the Same Scenario
There's a rather staggering volatility skew in the SPDR S&P 500 (NYSEARCA:SPY) October puts. With the stock at 164.10, the 155 puts are trading at 18.4% implied volatility with a price of 1.45 vs. theoretical value of 0.55. Now flip to the calls side and the mirror image 173 calls are trading at 12% implied volatility and the price is 0.35 vs. 0.45 theoretical value.
I wouldn't use this type of overloading on the put side as a "contrarian" indicator, but there is little doubt that protecting the downside by buying puts outright seems a low odds play, and risk reversals look outright suicidal. Ratio or butterfly put spreads look a lot more manageable.
Update on Short Interest
Short interest numbers for the NYSE are reported for the period of settlement date August 15. Short interest numbers have increased to 13,749,200,005 from 13,692,475,466 shares (revised) for an increase of 56,724,539 shares, or 0.41% with 1,598 advancers and 1,902 decliners. The NYSE has seen more advancers than decliners in 46 of the last 92 initial reporting periods.
NYSE and NASDAQ had risen the last eight of fourteen reporting periods and dropping across the board over the last three months.
During this period on a trade date basis (7/26 to 8/12) the S&P fell by -0.13%. The conclusion is shorts capitulated their positions with the recent strength. The next short interest collection period covers from 8/12 to 8/27, which is today, and so far, the S&P 500 has fallen by -1.93%. It will be interesting to see how much shorting takes place.
Short interest numbers for NASDAQ are reported for the period of settlement date August 15. Short interest numbers have decreased to 7,378,326,489 shares from 7,395,403,049 shares for a decrease of 17,076,560 shares or -0.23%. There were 1,089 increases and 1,402 decreases. In the last 92 reporting periods, NASDAQ has seen more advancers than decliners in 48 of the 92 last reporting periods.
Dedicated short sellers lost -5.74% in July (YTD -17.38%), as reported by www.hedgeindex.com and 2012 -15.99% while the index made 7.32% in 2011. For 2010, this index was down -17.79%. For 2009, this style lost -14.62%. In 2008, short sellers lost -1.52%. In 2007, short sellers made 4.14%.
The Day After
So here I sit with the highest cash levels in my portfolio since 2011. I feel kinda naked, but I know the market is really in a tenuous spot and without a washout low, there is still significant downside risk. I have cut to the bone now and prefer to manage market exposure via hedges at this point rather than selling positions. I have a handful of long-term stocks on the books that I still believe in, many of which I have buzzed about. This market is exceedingly weak, and the downtrend is becoming well established. We broke the November trendline, and I don't see much support below us until the 200-day moving average that sits around 1560. Attached is an updated chart that we looked at a couple days ago.
I am currently holding about 60% cash, 15% bonds (the bulk being my iShares Barclays 20+ Year Treasury Bond (NYSEARCA:TLT) buy from last week) and 25% core individual stocks. As I have mentioned before, my stylistic approach is maximize trends and systematically reduce risk and protect the portfolio when trends fail. I rarely go net short as you must be very quick to close those positions.
My expectations for the next couple of days are a drift up to the breakdown point of 1639 in the S&P 500, which would be a quality location to start layering into some shorts if that is your game. I will likely add hedges in that area.
Good luck my friends.
Click to enlarge
Thursday, August 29, 2013
X-Raying the Markets
The stock market has taken a few sick days recently, but the question now is whether or not it is suffering from a true illness or if it just pushed itself too hard for too long and needed a break. Indeed, the S&P 500 (SPX/1634.96) asserted its vigor with a powerful up-move from the June 24th low to the August 2nd high, but since then it appears to be out of breath and has struggled to convalesce to its erstwhile form. Given the recent pattern of lower lows and lower highs, it may be time for a check-up to help diagnose just what is ailing the market. Only then can a reasonable attempt at a prognosis be made. So just as a doctor will put a sick patient through a battery of tests, technicians will look to the charts to assess the internal health of the current investment landscape.
One diagnostic test that can be used is to attempt to identify where we are in the traditional business cycle by looking at the intermarket relationship between bonds, stocks, and commodities. Historically, these asset classes tend to rise and fall in sequence, with bond prices topping out before stocks, which, in turn, top before commodities. So far it looks like this pattern may be developing in its textbook manner. Bond prices, for the most part, topped in July 2012 and have declined ever since, while stocks went on to make new highs before this recent patch of weakness. It may be too early to call an equities top in this business cycle, but commodities have picked up recently, as measured by the S&P Goldman Sachs Commodity Index. Commodities tend to lead toward the end of business cycles, so their recent relative strength is something to keep an eye on.
To utilize another tool, we can examine the equity markets more closely by studying the price action within the S&P 500 individual sectors. Not surprisingly, the SPDRs Select Sector Energy ETF (NYSEARCA:XLE/$82.46) has been the best performer among the nine SPDRs Sector Funds over the past month, reiterating the aforementioned theme of outperformance by commodities. However, it is the breakdown of the Financials that most intrigues us at the moment. Since the major low in March 2009, the Financials have appeared very comfortably in the driver's seat as they consistently led the equity market higher. But recent trading sessions have jeopardized this trend as the SPDRs Select Sector Financial ETF (NYSEARCA:XLF/$19.49) has just broken its rising wedge pattern and is currently positioned for lower prices in the near term (see chart). The stock market might not yet be terminal at this point, but without support from the Financials, it may be hard for the broad market to make its miraculous recovery. For now, it's chicken soup and plenty of fluids until it can once more get on its feet.
Click to enlarge
The S&P 500's Reaction to US Adventures in the Middle East
The list below contains the dates of direct, US military interventions in Middle Eastern countries and the S&P 500's subsequent reaction. While traders and investors are understandably concerned about a military strike on Syria, military conflict doesn't always lead to a lower market. The reactions of the S&P to previous events hold no clear pattern. A spike in the price of oil is probably the biggest concern for investors if the US attacks - besides the unlikely event of a larger conflict erupting between the bigger players.
August 19, 1953 - At the request of the British M16, the CIA secretly organized and led a coup that overthrew Iranian Mohammad Mosaddeq. Both nations viewed Mosaddeq as a threat because he nationalized the Iranian oil industry, which which the British had controlled through the Anglo-Persian Oil Company.
Between August 19 and September 14, the S&P declined 6.58% from 24.31 to 22.71. The S&P had already been in a downtrend though. Afterwards, it started a bull run lasting until August 2, 1956 to 49.64 for a 118.58% gain.
July 15, 1958 - President Dwight D. Eisenhower authorized Operation Blue Bat, which involved about 14,000 men. Lebanese President Camille Chamoun asked the US for military aid after the Iraqi revolution that occurred a day earlier. The Christian and pro-Western Chamoun feared the Lebanese Muslims would gain control of the country and join the recently formed United Arab Republic, formed by Egypt and Syria. The US withdrew its forces on October 25, 1958.
From July 11 to July 15 the S&P dropped from 45.72 to 45.11 for a 1.33% decline.
Despite the small drop, the S&P would continue its uptrend from 45.11 to 50.81 on October 24, 1958 for a 12.64% gain. The market continued to gain despite the Soviet Union's threat to use nuclear weapons if the US intervened in Lebanon.
April 24, 1980 - President Jimmy Carter orders Operation Eagle Claw. US soldiers attempted to rescue 52 Americans held captive at the US embassy in Tehran. The helicopters encountered technical issues, causing commanders to abort the mission.
The S&P had declined from February through March before entering another uptrend. From April 24, the S&P would increase from 104.40 to 140.52 on November 28, the highest point of 1980, for a 34.60% gain.
August 25, 1982 - President Ronald Reagan sends marines to Beirut, Lebanon as part of a three-nation Multinational Force, which also included French and Italian troops, to try and help stabilize the country. The US military would remain active in the area until February 26, 1984.
By August 25, the S&P had reversed a downtrend. Beginning at 117.58 on that day, the S&P would reach 157.51 by February of 1984 for a 33.96% gain.
Between August 25, 1982 and February 26, 1984, attacks on the Multinational Force occurred.
During the week after the suicide bombing of the US Marine and French paratrooper barracks in Beirut on October 23, 1983, the S&P fell from 165.99 to 163.37 for a 1.58% decline. The S&P had reached a top on October 10 of that year, and it would not resume an uptrend until August of 1984.
When US Air Forces targeted Syrian anti-aircraft batteries on December 4, the S&P barely moved. However, the USS New Jersey battleship fired on Lebanon on December 14 and 15, and the S&P fell from 163.33 to 161.66 over the two days for a 1.02% decline.
When the Multinational Force began withdrawing on February 20, the S&P increased from 154.64 the following day to 159.30 by the time the US Marines had withdrawn for a 3.01% gain.
August 2, 1990 - When Iraqi troops invaded Kuwait starting the First Gulf War, the S&P stood at 351.48 and would drop to 295.46 by October 11 for a 15.94% decline.
The S&P regained some ground, rising to 331.75 before falling again by 5.67%, two weeks before the US military launched Operation Desert Storm on January 16, 1991. By this time, the S&P had regained its losses, and when the ceasefire occurred on February 28, 1991, the S&P reached 367.07 and would continue its uptrend.
August 20, 1998 - The US military launched cruise missile attacks on terrorist bases in Afghanistan and a pharmaceutical factory in Sudan. President Clinton authorized the attacks in retaliation to the US embassy bombings that occurred on August 7, 1998 in Dar es Salaam, Tanzania and Nairobi, Kenya.
The S&P remained little changed between these dates. The strikes occurred just days before the S&P fell 11.7%.
October 7, 2001 - President Bush launched Operation Enduring Freedom in response to the terrorist attacks on September 11. When the market opened on October 8 after that weekend, the S&P dropped from 1071.38 to 1062.44 for a 0.83% decline. But no major moves occurred on the index at the beginning of military operations. The S&P had rebounded from the sell-off that occurred after September 11, and it would continue its longer downtrend until it bottomed at 776.76 on October 9, 2002.
March 19, 2003 - When the Second Gulf War began, the S&P had not technically reversed its downtrend. Even by May 1, when President George Bush gave his "Mission Accomplished" speech, the S&P had not technically created an uptrend. During the conflict, the S&P gained 4.84%, moving from 874.02 to 916.30.
May 2, 2011 - When the US Navy SEAL team killed Osama Bin Laden, the S&P had little reaction.
Times are tense out in... the entire world?
1. Fast food workers, who are at the absolute bottom of the income distribution curve, are protesting to get their pay bumped up.
2. There is a raging debate over where it's time to attack Syria.
3. People who voluntarily give all their personal information to Facebook (NASDAQ:FB) and Twitter are going crazy over government surveillance programs.
It makes for a toxic mix in the air perhaps not seen since Occupy Wall Street, which saw a market pullback before a moonshot higher.
The S&P was at 1216 on September 16, 2011, before hitting a closing low of 1099 on October 3, 2011. From there, the rally was on, and the index hit 1419 on April 2, 2012 -- a full 29% off the lows.
Are we seeing a parallel pullback now that the news is so lousy?
Friday, August 30, 2013
India and Brazil were trying to restart the game of "he said, she said" that we saw predominantly during the Euro crises. This morning at 8:35, it was reported that India's principal economic adviser Dasgupta said, "India and other emerging markets are seeking a coordinated FX intervention that could happen in days rather than weeks. Brazil and India can start the move." Twenty minutes later the head of the Brazilian central bank said "there is no initiative of that sort." Now, Dasgupta is saying it's "hard to say if emerging markets are planning an FX move." Ugh. Will there be clowns at this circus?
With regards to the emerging markets situation, I would have to think that the rupee is pricing in a heckuva lot now of economic slowdown, which has me backing away from the EM short some. One thing I've learned/was taught is that once something moves in an extreme (record) in one direction, there is a high probability that the next move is not in the same direction. Still marinating on those thoughts, but thought I'd share.
The income data we saw this morning was the worst we had seen all year and is a bad trend to kick off the 3Q. Additionally, the spending data we saw matches up with the negative skew on guidance from consumer related stocks in the 2Q. Already, I've seen Barclay's (NYSE:BCS) taking down its 3Q GDP estimate to 1.6% from 1.9% (annualized) and Goldman to 1.5% from 1.7%.
Treasuries are dealing with a month-end index extension by 0.11 years due, which is the obvious reason for outperformance in the long end. Nothing new I can add today, the trend is still looking up but admittedly fragile. I will most likely wait until Tuesday to add to a long position, however.
Volumes looking light in ES (SP futures) and TY (10-year futures) thus far. ES has only traded 420K contracts vs 15 DMA of 1.587 million and TY at 493K vs 1.275 million 15 DMA. NYSE all securities breadth is just ticking 2:1 negative after the first 30 minutes.
I know this is a bit overdue... below is a picture from my trip to Montana at Hidden Lake up in Logan's Pass, Glacier National Park. Photo credit goes to Brandon Perry.
Click to enlarge
Nuance Communications Getting More Icahn Love
There has been a lot written about Carl Icahn's latest moves regarding Nuance Communications (NASDAQ:NUAN). The two key items are these: He's in talks with Nuance about adding a board seat or seats, and he's still increasing his position in the name.
At this point, he's up to a 16.9% stake in the company. That's a big darn stake.
I'll remind readers that Icahn is not impervious, and I took a beating on one other Icahn activist action in the past. But in general I think he has a sound strategy with Nuance, and the company also has enough of a moat with its current set of technology as well as customer partnerships for a strong probability of value creation.
The key for Icahn is whether he can get Nuance sold, which is what I believe he wants. And the rub for any sale to a couple key tech companies like Google (NASDAQ:GOOG) or Microsoft (NASDAQ:MSFT) is that Apple is such a key customer that it take those two out of play. This also creates a bit of an issue as Apple then becomes a logical buyer, but it has shown little interest.
Then lastly, given that Nuance's market cap isn't small (nearly $6B), it makes the company a bit too large for an easy deal as there are not many software names that can easily gobble a company of this size up. Taking Google, Microsoft, and Apple out, the list is pretty well left with just IBM (NYSE:IBM), Oracle (NYSE:ORCL), SAP (NYSE:SAP), EMC (NYSE:EMC), VMWare (NYSE:VMW), and maybe Cognizant (NASDAQ:CTSH). My view is the data storage/cloud players would not be interested.
Bottom Line: When one looks at all this, it does become pretty clear why Nuance hasn't seen a corporate takeover yet. If it isn't Appleor private equity, the rest don't shake out very well. That doesn't mean that taking a shot at Nuance here doesn't make sense. I think it does as the stock has simply gotten very beaten up again. But this is a patience trade, and I'm one of the few people in the world left who can tolerate patience trades.
The reaction to Kerry's speech feels almost Fed-like (lots of bouncing around). For the meantime, the market appears comforted by his assertion that any action will be short-lived and not involve boots on the ground, which is aimed at soothing worries that Syria could be another Iraq orAfghanistan. This was supposed to be one of the most boring days of the year, but I wouldn't be surprised to see more volatility this afternoon.
Follow the markets all day every day with a FREE 14 day trial to Buzz & Banter. Over 30 professional traders share their ideas in real-time. Learn more.
The information on this website solely reflects the analysis of or opinion about the performance of securities and financial markets by the writers whose articles appear on the site. The views expressed by the writers are not necessarily the views of Minyanville Media, Inc. or members of its management. Nothing contained on the website is intended to constitute a recommendation or advice addressed to an individual investor or category of investors to purchase, sell or hold any security, or to take any action with respect to the prospective movement of the securities markets or to solicit the purchase or sale of any security. Any investment decisions must be made by the reader either individually or in consultation with his or her investment professional. Minyanville writers and staff may trade or hold positions in securities that are discussed in articles appearing on the website. Writers of articles are required to disclose whether they have a position in any stock or fund discussed in an article, but are not permitted to disclose the size or direction of the position. Nothing on this website is intended to solicit business of any kind for a writer's business or fund. Minyanville management and staff as well as contributing writers will not respond to emails or other communications requesting investment advice.
Copyright 2011 Minyanville Media, Inc. All Rights Reserved.