Sorry!! The article you are trying to read is not available now.
Thank you very much;
you're only a step away from
downloading your reports.

Jason Haver: Equities and Bonds -- Signs That Bears May Have More Firepower


Equities are following the projections, while there continue to be hints that risk-off is taking over.

In essentially every update I've written this month, I've mentioned that the S&P 500 (INDEXSP:.INX) appeared likely to rally to new all-time highs, and that that rally would probably be a head-fake breakout doomed to whipsaw. It's probably fair to say that was a decent call, and my only concern at this point is that it seemed so incredibly obvious and it almost happened "too easy." (That always makes me a little nervous.) It's certainly too soon to say with certainty that we've seen an intermediate top, but with everything going according to plan, there's presently no reason to doubt that thesis, either.  

The simple solution is that the bulls will need to sustain trade north of 1903 to cast doubt on the bear case; so until that happens, or until there are signs of a meaningful bottom, the bear case will remain favored. Today, we'll take another look at some of the supporting players to the bear case for equities.

The first is the US 30-year Treasury bond (USB). On February 20, I wrote that I felt the long bond was on its way to 138-140. The funny thing is, at roughly the same time, nearly 100% of economists surveyed felt that bonds were heading lower. So that's something to consider, for those folks who view technical analysis as some kind of pointless voodoo.
The long bond is still implying a shift toward risk-off and thus hints at the potential of continued trouble for equities.

Click to enlarge
Next up is a chart I haven't updated since mid-April -- this chart tracks the ratio of the iShares iBoxx High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (NYSEARCA:HYG) to the iShares Barclays 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF (NYSEARCA:TLT). I use this as a measure of risk-on/risk-off:  When the ratio heads lower, it means risk-off, which is bad for equities. In March, I mentioned that HYG:TLT had broken through the uptrend line that began in 2012; I felt that was a warning sign. Now this ratio is breaking down from a pretty ominous-looking head and shoulders, which could suggest more trouble on the horizon for risk assets.

Click to enlarge
Finally, the SPX chart, and I'm going to break down the time frames separately to avoid confusion.

Bigger picture, RSI suggests new lows are on the horizon for SPX one way or another -- so whether we rally near term or not, I'd be surprised if 1862 isn't broken in the coming sessions.

Near term, there are two ways to view the recent decline:   

1. The conventional way to view the big drop is as the belly of wave iii-down of 1-down. That would mean the bounce that began yesterday is merely a fourth wave consolidation that should be fairly short-lived. In that count, the market is still forming wave A or 1 down, with wave v-down of 1-down still to come. 
2. The way I'm tempted to view the decline, though, is as all of wave 1-down. Instead of viewing the big drop as wave iii-down, I suspect it may have been an extended fifth wave. Calling extended fifths is difficult, though, because the technical indicators literally don't work -- so it's all about "feel." These are the types of calls I run with as a trader but shy away from as an analyst, so do with this what you will. If this were an extended fifth, then expect a retrace rally toward 1879-82 (the chart says 80-82), followed by a retest of the 1863-70 zone, followed by another rally leg up toward 1888.  

If SPX sustains trade beneath 1862, then we're probably dealing with option 1. If SPX sustains trade north of 1873, then option 2 has a decent shot. 

Click to enlarge

Not shown on the above charts: SPX recently tested the 50-day moving average for the third time in three weeks and may thus be exhausting buyers in that zone. If it tests the 50 DMA a fourth time, then it's likely to break -- and that could spark a decent sell-off, since a fair number of traders use the 50 DMA as a stop zone. That hypothetical fits my expectation that SPX is completing wave 1 down, with the wave 2-up rally on deck, to be followed by wave 3-down. That third wave would coincide with a break of the 50 DMA, which could provide selling fuel to power the decline. The third wave is usually the longest and strongest of a move, so I like the overall setup.
In conclusion, while it's too early to confirm an intermediate top, everything has gone according to plan, so the preferred view will remain bearish on the bigger picture until such time as the market says we should consider other options. Presently, the first thing bulls would need to accomplish is to sustain trade north of 1903 -- but since RSI confirmed the 1862 low, it appears unlikely that will happen immediately. It instead looks likely that new lows are on the horizon one way or another. And, as discussed, new lows will break the 50 DMA, which could spark an extended sell-off. Trade safe.

Follow me on Twitter while I try to figure out exactly how to make practical use of it: @PretzelLogic.

Follow the markets all day every day with a FREE 14 day trial to Buzz & Banter. Over 30 professional traders share their ideas in real-time. Learn more.
< Previous
  • 1
Next >
No positions in stocks mentioned.
The information on this website solely reflects the analysis of or opinion about the performance of securities and financial markets by the writers whose articles appear on the site. The views expressed by the writers are not necessarily the views of Minyanville Media, Inc. or members of its management. Nothing contained on the website is intended to constitute a recommendation or advice addressed to an individual investor or category of investors to purchase, sell or hold any security, or to take any action with respect to the prospective movement of the securities markets or to solicit the purchase or sale of any security. Any investment decisions must be made by the reader either individually or in consultation with his or her investment professional. Minyanville writers and staff may trade or hold positions in securities that are discussed in articles appearing on the website. Writers of articles are required to disclose whether they have a position in any stock or fund discussed in an article, but are not permitted to disclose the size or direction of the position. Nothing on this website is intended to solicit business of any kind for a writer's business or fund. Minyanville management and staff as well as contributing writers will not respond to emails or other communications requesting investment advice.

Copyright 2011 Minyanville Media, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Featured Videos