Sorry!! The article you are trying to read is not available now.
Thank you very much;
you're only a step away from
downloading your reports.

Forget the 'Great Rotation': The Prudent Move Today Is Into Alternatives

By

Talk of the 'great rotation' out of bonds and into stocks needs to be much more focused on alternative strategies going forward.

PrintPRINT
Be prudent and you'll probably forego gains. Be risky and you'll probably make some more money, but you may be bushwhacked and, if you are, your excuses will look thin. Your call. We of course are making our call.
– Jeremy Grantham on US equities, November 2013 Letter

Much has been made this year of the "great rotation" from bonds to stocks. The theory was that after years of pulling money out of equity funds and putting it into bond funds, investors were finally going to start doing the opposite. Year-to-date gains of over 26% in the S&P 500 (INDEXSP:.INX) and negative returns in bonds seem to finally have lit enough of a fire under investors for a reversal to take place. After all, nothing is a more powerful motivator than recent performance. Through the first 10 months of this year, investors have poured money into stock funds at a faster pace than at any point since 2000. At the same time, we have seen the largest redemptions from bond funds in years.

The supposed rationale behind this "great rotation" is the historically low yields on bonds. For example, even as interest rates have risen over the past six months, the Vanguard Total Bond Market Index Fund (MUTF:VBMFX) is still yielding only 2%. Unless you are expecting rates to decline from here, these bond funds are not going to provide a return much above 2% over the next few years. Where is an investor to go, then, to achieve a reasonable rate of return or even to keep up with the rate of inflation?

Given the strong returns in the S&P 500 this year, many have migrated to US equities. As the upward path in US stocks has been unusually smooth, some investors are even viewing equities as a safer alternative to bonds. But looking out longer term, the rotation to equities only works if we can assume that equities will have strong returns with lower volatility going forward. Many investors are arguing just this, stating that because bond returns and interest rates are low, equity returns will be high and volatility will remain muted. Unfortunately, this assumption is incredibly flawed.

The low returns on bonds today are largely a reflection of a lower return environment for all asset classes going forward. There is no free lunch. Much like the cash-for-clunkers program, which simply pulled demand forward, what Fed chairman Ben Bernanke has achieved through zero interest-rate policy and quantitative easing is higher short-term asset prices and returns that have been pulled forward. When the Fed stimulus is inevitably withdrawn in the coming years, all of the assets that benefited from these policies will suffer just as demand for autos dropped sharply after the cash-for-clunkers program ended.

As the venerable Jeremy Grantham of GMO said in his most recent letter, the "US [equity] market is already badly overpriced – indeed we believe it is priced to deliver negative real returns over seven years… In our view, prudent investors should already be reducing their equity bets and their risk level in general."

GMO has a fair value estimate for the S&P 500 of 1100, or 39% below today's close of 1800. So while I would certainly agree that bonds are likely to underwhelm in the coming years, investors are likely to be equally disappointed in their purchases of US equities at current prices.

The more prudent rotation for many investors to consider given the current environment is out of traditional strategies and into alternative ones. These tactics do not offer constant equity beta and have therefore underperformed US equities over the past year, but that is precisely the point. The only way to achieve true diversification benefits is to add an asset class with a low correlation to the existing assets in a portfolio. And unlike long-only equity and bond funds that rely on fundamentals and rising prices with a "convergence" to fair value, these strategies are "divergent" in nature and have the ability to generate profits during periods (including shocks/crises) when fundamentals do not matter.

Given the outlier year to the upside we have had in 2013, I don't expect the average investor to be concerned with his or her US equity holdings; most are not envisioning an environment where equities experience more than a three-day decline. If anything, investors are likely wishing they had more exposure to equities. As we approach year-end, though, the more savvy investors are not likely to be betting on another outlier year in 2014. They are also likely to be following Grantham's advice in reducing "equity bets" and overall risk.

The bottom line is that with all the talk of the "great rotation," investors have missed the most important question: Are US stocks a meaningfully better alternative to bonds? At current levels and on a risk-adjusted basis, this is a difficult case to make. As such, at a time when both equity and bond funds are poised to deliver below average future returns, the prudent investor should be considering a rotation into alternative strategies.

Twitter: @pensionpartners
No positions in stocks mentioned.

This writing is for informational purposes only and does not constitute an offer to sell, a solicitation to buy, or a recommendation regarding any securities transaction, or as an offer to provide advisory or other services by Pension Partners, LLC in any jurisdiction in which such offer, solicitation, purchase or sale would be unlawful under the securities laws of such jurisdiction. The information contained in this writing should not be construed as financial or investment advice on any subject matter. Pension Partners, LLC expressly disclaims all liability in respect to actions taken based on any or all of the information on this writing.

The information on this website solely reflects the analysis of or opinion about the performance of securities and financial markets by the writers whose articles appear on the site. The views expressed by the writers are not necessarily the views of Minyanville Media, Inc. or members of its management. Nothing contained on the website is intended to constitute a recommendation or advice addressed to an individual investor or category of investors to purchase, sell or hold any security, or to take any action with respect to the prospective movement of the securities markets or to solicit the purchase or sale of any security. Any investment decisions must be made by the reader either individually or in consultation with his or her investment professional. Minyanville writers and staff may trade or hold positions in securities that are discussed in articles appearing on the website. Writers of articles are required to disclose whether they have a position in any stock or fund discussed in an article, but are not permitted to disclose the size or direction of the position. Nothing on this website is intended to solicit business of any kind for a writer's business or fund. Minyanville management and staff as well as contributing writers will not respond to emails or other communications requesting investment advice.

Copyright 2011 Minyanville Media, Inc. All Rights Reserved.

PrintPRINT
 
Featured Videos

WHAT'S POPULAR IN THE VILLE