Sorry!! The article you are trying to read is not available now.
Thank you very much;
you're only a step away from
downloading your reports.

Will ECB Do QE in 2014?

By

Interest rates and deflationary pressure are pushing Draghi to make a change in policy.

PrintPRINT
Chatter has been increasing lately that the European Central Bank may enact more "non-traditional" measures soon following its recent interest rate cut and ongoing deflationary pressure. We all know this sounds like the ultimate course of action Mario Draghi may end up taking. After all, when the zero bound of interest rates is reached, policy options become more and more limited. Several ideas have been floated around, from negative interest rates on bank deposits to full-scale QE as has occurred in Japan and the US.

Regarding negative interest rates, that certainly could force money out of banks and into the economy as idle cash gets, well, "tapered," but there are many butterfly effects and unforeseen consequences that can be damaging under such a move. Regarding quantitative easing, the jury is still as to whether or not buying bonds is actually effective as forcing reflation in the economy as opposed to just asset markets. However, QE likely has much less stigma attached to it than negative interest rates.

To some extent, the actions of the Bank of Japan and Federal Reserve have provided a framework and cover for the European Central Bank to enact quantitative easing, even if evidence does not support its ability to reflate underlying economic growth. One would assume that Germany would be averse to this. However, the higher the euro goes, the more amenable Germany's policymakers may be to QE under the idea that it could cause depreciation in the currency and spark export growth, similar to what's happened in Japan. Indeed the hardest thing to do for any central bank is to do nothing, but Draghi's "whatever it takes" pledge is at risk.

The clock is ticking on deflation becoming entrenched, and risk sentiment is waning into new highs. Take a look below at the price ratio of the iShares Spain ETF (NYSEARCA:EWP) relative to the iShares Germany ETF (NYSEARCA:EWG). As a reminder, a rising price ratio means the numerator/EWP is outperforming (up more/down less) the denominator/EWG. A falling ratio means the opposite.



Consider this a gauge on underlying risk sentiment. Spain is considered riskier and more sensitive to reflation than the bigger "safer" Germany. Note Spain has been underperforming as deflation concerns have been getting more attention. Continued weakness here means money -- which has caused a meaningful move in Europe over the past five months -- may waver on what's happened recently in terms of it simply being a trade versus a long-term investment.

If European asset markets begin to falter, the ECB may have no choice but to prop up assets with more stimulus to counter overwhelming deflationary pressures. However, these tools may ultimately not work in terms of their intended consequence for the underlying economy. All that means is that from the standpoint of anticipating the anticipation of others, more money is coming, causing continued divergence of asset markets to underlying fundamentals.

Analysis required? No – not when central banks keep trying to fight short sellers with the printing press.

Twitter: @pensionpartners
No positions in stocks mentioned.

This writing is for informational purposes only and does not constitute an offer to sell, a solicitation to buy, or a recommendation regarding any securities transaction, or as an offer to provide advisory or other services by Pension Partners, LLC in any jurisdiction in which such offer, solicitation, purchase or sale would be unlawful under the securities laws of such jurisdiction. The information contained in this writing should not be construed as financial or investment advice on any subject matter. Pension Partners, LLC expressly disclaims all liability in respect to actions taken based on any or all of the information on this writing.

The information on this website solely reflects the analysis of or opinion about the performance of securities and financial markets by the writers whose articles appear on the site. The views expressed by the writers are not necessarily the views of Minyanville Media, Inc. or members of its management. Nothing contained on the website is intended to constitute a recommendation or advice addressed to an individual investor or category of investors to purchase, sell or hold any security, or to take any action with respect to the prospective movement of the securities markets or to solicit the purchase or sale of any security. Any investment decisions must be made by the reader either individually or in consultation with his or her investment professional. Minyanville writers and staff may trade or hold positions in securities that are discussed in articles appearing on the website. Writers of articles are required to disclose whether they have a position in any stock or fund discussed in an article, but are not permitted to disclose the size or direction of the position. Nothing on this website is intended to solicit business of any kind for a writer's business or fund. Minyanville management and staff as well as contributing writers will not respond to emails or other communications requesting investment advice.

Copyright 2011 Minyanville Media, Inc. All Rights Reserved.

PrintPRINT

Busy? Subscribe to our free newsletter!

Submit
 

WHAT'S POPULAR IN THE VILLE