Sorry!! The article you are trying to read is not available now.
Thank you very much;
you're only a step away from
downloading your reports.

With Help From Rupert Murdoch, The Occupy Wall Street Index Outperforms the S&P 500


On the one-year anniversary of Occupy Wall Street, it's time to look back at how our index has performed.


MINYANVILLE ORIGINAL A year ago today, Occupy Wall Street hit New York City to make a statement on a litany of modern economic issues, ranging from income inequality to student loans to organized labor.

Less than a month later, we created The Occupy Wall Street Index to track the performance of the companies that the self-proclaimed 99% love to hate. (See: The Occupy Wall Street Index: 9 Companies the 99% Loves to Hate.)

The goal was to take an admittedly non-scientific look at whether companies that behave badly reward investors.

The Index consisted of nine companies, some of which were being directly targeted by the protestors, like JPMorgan (JPM), Goldman Sachs (GS), News Corp. (NWSA), and General Electric (GE).

We also took a look at companies representing issues the Occupy Wall Street movement cares about. We selected McDonald's (MCD) for income inequality (according to the BLS, fast-food cook is the worst-paying job in America), Wal-Mart (WMT) for organized labor, and SLM Corp. (SLM) for student loans.

The index was rounded out by serial polluter BP (BP) and defense contractor Lockheed Martin (LMT).

So what happened?

Did it pay off to bet on these supposed bad guys of corporate America?

Well, as it turned out, The Occupy Wall Street Index returned 26%, outperforming the S&P 500 (^GSPC) by about 5.5 percentage points.

Click to enlarge

Let's take a look at what drove the big upside.

Interestingly enough, the best performer in the Index was News Corp., which has come under enormous scrutiny in the past year over the UK phone-hacking scandal. Chairman and CEO Rupert Murdoch, however, survived the intense media and political scrutiny to announce a split of the company, a move that was very well-received by investors, who have sent the stock up a whopping 44%. (See: News Corp. Split May Make Disney Last Media Tycoon.)

Wal-Mart was the second-best performer, up 42% as it finally broke out of a decade-long trading range between $50 and $60.

JPMorgan also impressed, returning 23% despite the heat of the infamous London Whale Fail scandal, which lost steam when Congress and the Senate Banking Committee couldn't come close to landing a knockout punch on CEO Jamie Dimon. (See: Fox Watching Chicken Coop? Senate Banking Committee and Dimon.)

On the negative side, McDonald's returned just 4% as a string of disappointing sales numbers have dragged down the stock of what was once an incredibly strong multi-year growth story. We also saw middling performances out of BP and Goldman Sachs, both of which underperformed their solid sectors.

It's funny. According to a recent Goldman Sachs study, a full 89% of hedge funds are underperforming the S&P 500 this year.

Maybe some of those folks should head down to Zuccotti Park today and read the signs.

Twitter: @MichaelComeau

Follow the markets all day every day with a FREE 14 day trial to Buzz & Banter. Over 30 professional traders share their ideas in real-time. Learn more.

< Previous
  • 1
Next >
No positions in stocks mentioned.
The information on this website solely reflects the analysis of or opinion about the performance of securities and financial markets by the writers whose articles appear on the site. The views expressed by the writers are not necessarily the views of Minyanville Media, Inc. or members of its management. Nothing contained on the website is intended to constitute a recommendation or advice addressed to an individual investor or category of investors to purchase, sell or hold any security, or to take any action with respect to the prospective movement of the securities markets or to solicit the purchase or sale of any security. Any investment decisions must be made by the reader either individually or in consultation with his or her investment professional. Minyanville writers and staff may trade or hold positions in securities that are discussed in articles appearing on the website. Writers of articles are required to disclose whether they have a position in any stock or fund discussed in an article, but are not permitted to disclose the size or direction of the position. Nothing on this website is intended to solicit business of any kind for a writer's business or fund. Minyanville management and staff as well as contributing writers will not respond to emails or other communications requesting investment advice.

Copyright 2011 Minyanville Media, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Featured Videos