This is the first installment in a 2-part series. Part 2 can be found here.
Yet another crisis confronts us, as we’ll have to deal with the aftermath of a rather large number of bank failures over the next year, which are likely to overwhelm the ability of the FDIC to insure your bank deposits. The banking system, the FDIC, and Freddie and Fannie aren’t pretty to look at, but as realists we must know what we’re facing.
The US Banking System Is in Trouble
A few weeks ago when I was in Maine, I met Chris Whalen. Chris is the managing director of a service called Institutional Risk Analytics, whose primary business is analyzing the health of banks and financial institutions.
If you’re one of their clients, you can go to their website and drill quite deep into all aspects of every bank in America. And they’ve come up with various metrics to compare how well-capitalized a bank is, how much risk it's taking and what kind of losses (or profits) it can expect. It’s a one-of-a-kind firm, and the data gives Chris a very special perspective on the US banking system.
And what he sees isn’t pretty. There’s a crisis brewing. He expects 100 banks to fail between now and July of 2009. Most of them will be small, but there will be a few large banks. He estimates their total assets at $850 billion (not a typo!). Those are the assets the FDIC is going to have to cover when they take over the banks.
Take Washington Mutual (WM), for example. There are problems there. Their debt now trades at 20%, which is worse than junk. There’s no way they could issue preferred stock to recapitalize their business.
And they’re going to need more capital, as they have writedowns in their future due to the slowing economy. Any common issue would have to seriously dilute existing shareholders to almost nothing.
There are circumstances in which they can survive, but it would take a remarkable recovery for the US economy - which isn’t likely. Maybe management can pull a rabbit out of the hat, but it will need some strong magic to get the capital they need at a cost they can live with.
The FDIC has about $50 billion. These reserves have been built up over the years from deposit insurance paid by banks that are part of the program. They’re going to need an estimated $20 billion just to cover the failure of IndyMac.
The FDIC will have to cover only a small percentage of the $850 billion, as some of those assets will surely be good. But if they have to cover 10%, then the FDIC would need another $50 billion. Does that sound like a lot? Chris thinks a more conservative number for planning purposes would be 20% to 25% potential losses - and you just hope it doesn’t get there.
John Mauldin, Best-Selling author and recognized financial expert, is also editor of the free Thoughts From the Frontline that goes out to over one million readers each week. For more information on John, or to read his free weekly economic letter, go to Frontlinethoughts.com.
Minyanville staff and contributors may trade or hold securities that are discussed in an article. Staff and contributors will indicate whether they have a position in any security discussed, but will not indicate size or direction. The information on this site is not intended as individualized investment advice and all investment decisions by a reader must in all cases be made by the reader either individually or together with his/her investment professional. The views expressed in articles appearing on this site are solely those of the staff and contributors and should not be attributed to any other person or entity except where expressly stated. Minyanville staff and contributors will not respond to requests for investment advice.
Copyright 2008 Minyanville Publishing and Multimedia, LLC. All Rights Reserved.