Bears Overly Pessimistic About Unemployment

James Kostohryz  Sep 04, 2009 3:20 pm

Bears Overly Pessimistic About Unemployment
 
The outcome is uncertain, but some factors are irrelevant predictors of growth.
 

 
Many readers ask me how it’s possible for the economy to recover if unemployment is so high. Indeed, many are fond of pointing out that the “real” unemployment rate is higher than the 9.7% reported today.

The truth of the matter is that when projecting growth, it really matters very little what the absolute rate of unemployment is -- whether it be 9.7% or the 16.8% U-6 alternative figure provided by the BLS, or the even higher figures publicized by Shadowstats.

What matters is the change at the margin. Growth is all about change.

Let’s assume that the unemployment rate is 10% and that it remains at that level for a full year -- i.e. the unemployment rate remains unchanged. Let’s assume that the average number of hours worked doesn’t change. Let’s also assume that there’s no net change in the number of long-term unemployed. What would one project for the growth rate of private consumption over the next 12 months?

One would expect nominal consumption growth of at least 4.0%. Why?

First, 1.0% growth is generated simply from the 1.0% growth labor force, which means that in order to keep the unemployment rate constant, there needs to be employment growth of 1%. All things equal, employment growth of 1% will mean nominal gross national income growth of 1.0%.

Second, even in the midst of the current brutal recession, average hourly earnings have grown by 2.6% per annum. All things being equal, income growth of 2.6% will imply consumption growth of the same magnitude.

Third, productivity is growing at a 6.0%-plus clip, which implies earnings growth for companies. Even the most bearish Wall Street analysts are forecasting very dramatic earnings growth in 2010. Companies will either spend or invest most of that money, providing a substantial boost to net private expenditures.

Fourth, a stable employment situation will cause households to reduce precautionary savings somewhat as the fear of job losses subside. This will necessarily boost consumption.

Thus, in a scenario of a stable labor market -- i.e. employment conditions are neither improving nor worsening -- it’s difficult to see how consumption will increase by much less than 4.0%. A lower projection would require one to assume that consumers are going to become even more stingy and frugal than they are right now. That doesn’t seem likely. To the contrary, it seems more likely that on the aggregate, consumers will relax a bit on some of their more draconian savings measures.

Today’s Employment Report

So what does today’s employment report portend for future consumption growth?

Across the board, either on a month-over-month (MoM) or on a three-month rolling basis, whether you look at the overall non-farm payrolls numbers, the part-time work numbers, the discouraged-workers numbers, and all of the rest of it, it’s clear that the rate at which the employment situation is worsening has continued to slow. And it must be recognized that the situation is currently considerably better than most bears were expecting at the beginning of this year when forecasts of 500,000 job losses through the end of 2009 were common
23 of 39 (59%) found this helpful
Rate this article:  (39 Votes)
Comments (18) See All Comments »
09-05-2009, 8:35 pm
Lowell,

I did not leave this out of my calculations. The fact is that US fiscal deficits need not be an obstacle to growth for the next couple of business cycles -- ie the next 10--15 years. That does not mean something should not be d
Read More
09-05-2009, 9:59 pm
Where'd you pull the stats on credit? (eg 20-30% being in credit trouble?)

Random 1:
Was it a threat of a financial breakdown what caused the march low? Or a big aggregate margin call? Both?

Fractional reserve
Read More
09-07-2009, 10:10 pm
James - average hourly earnings are up BUT average HOURS are down too. You can't assume this translates to higher consumption- to the contrary, this is a symptom of DECLINING income as people are shoved from full time to part time (at lower wa
Read More
09-08-2009, 12:59 am
Hi Sean,

I explicitly assume for purposes of the scenario I lay out that the the overal labor market remains stable -- and I explicitly include hours. You are correct that hours have declined. But they appear to have stabilized. Indee
Read More
09-09-2009, 12:04 pm

Mr. Kostohryz,

I truly wish I could sit down and debate you for a couple of hours. I'm certain your knowledge of economics is greater than mine but I'll gladly come to the debate armed only with my common sense.
Read More
discuss this article and more on the mv exchange
No positions in stocks mentioned.

Get real-time options trading ideas from Steve Smith, veteran options trader and newsletter author, plus let him show you the way to cut risk and boost your returns through the strategic use of options.  Click here for a free 14 day trial to OptionSmith by Steve Smith.



The information on this website solely reflects the analysis of or opinion about the performance of securities and financial markets by the writers whose articles appear on the site. The views expressed by the writers are not necessarily the views of Minyanville Media, Inc. or members of its management. Nothing contained on the website is intended to constitute a recommendation or advice addressed to an individual investor or category of investors to purchase, sell or hold any security, or to take any action with respect to the prospective movement of the securities markets or to solicit the purchase or sale of any security. Any investment decisions must be made by the reader either individually or in consultation with his or her investment professional. Minyanville writers and staff may trade or hold positions in securities that are discussed in articles appearing on the website. Writers of articles are required to disclose whether they have a position in any stock or fund discussed in an article, but are not permitted to disclose the size or direction of the position. Nothing on this website is intended to solicit business of any kind for a writer's business or fund. Minyanville management and staff as well as contributing writers will not respond to emails or other communications requesting investment advice.

Copyright 2009 Minyanville Media, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Ticker Talk
Popular Tickers:
SPX »AMZN »F »
Select
  •  
Talk Now
Share this Talk on your site:
Send us your feedback

Our Professors

rss article alert